{"id":{"repo_id":"wayne-thes","oai_identifier":"oai:digitalcommons.wayne.edu:oa_dissertations-1595"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/wayne-thes/oai:digitalcommons.wayne.edu:oa_dissertations-1595","repository":{"repo_id":"wayne-thes","name":"Wayne State University","base_url":"https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Robustness And Power Of The Kornbrot Rank Difference, Signed Ranks, And Dependent Samples T-Test","abstract":"<p> <strong>ABSTRACT</strong> </p> <p> <strong>ROBUSTNESS AND POWER OF THE KORNBROT RANK DIFFERENCE, SIGNED RANKS, AND DEPENDENT SAMPLES T-TEST</strong> </p> <p>by</p> <p> <strong>NORMAN N. HAIDOUS</strong> </p> <p>December 2012</p> <p> <strong>Advisor:</strong>Dr. Shlomo S. Sawilowsky</p> <p> <strong>Major:</strong>Evaluation and Research - Statistics</p> <p> <strong>Degree:</strong>Doctor of Philosophy</p> <p> The purpose of the study was to compare the power and accuracy of the Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks test in comparison to the rank difference test when the assumption of normality is not met, the data are ordinal, and the sample size is small. The study also investigated Kornbrot's (1990) claim that the rank difference test should be used over the Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks tests \"in all paired comparison designs where the data are not both of internal scale type and of known distribution time\" (p. 258). </p> <p> The study design allowed for the comparison of the comparative power and robustness of the Wilcoxon-Signed Ranks-Test, rank difference test, and the t-test. Utilizing five distributions (Normal, chi-square, df = 1, chi-square, df = 2, chi-square, df = 8, and t distribution, df = 3) and three sample sizes (10, 10), (15, 15), and (20, 20). All distributions and their data sets were created by using a pseudo-random number generator, via Monte Carlo simulation, using Fortran 77.</p> <p> The results showed the t-test had power advantages over the Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks test and the rank differences, but with explanation. There was no evidence within the results to confirm that the rank difference test had substantial power advantages over Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks test.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;ABSTRACT&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;ROBUSTNESS AND POWER OF THE KORNBROT RANK DIFFERENCE, SIGNED RANKS, AND DEPENDENT SAMPLES T-TEST&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;by&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;NORMAN N. HAIDOUS&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;December 2012&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Advisor:&lt;/strong&gt;Dr. Shlomo S. Sawilowsky&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Major:&lt;/strong&gt;Evaluation and Research - Statistics&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Degree:&lt;/strong&gt;Doctor of Philosophy&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; The purpose of the study was to compare the power and accuracy of the Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks test in comparison to the rank difference test when the assumption of normality is not met, the data are ordinal, and the sample size is small. The study also investigated Kornbrot&#x27;s (1990) claim that the rank difference test should be used over the Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks tests &quot;in all paired comparison designs where the data are not both of internal scale type and of known distribution time&quot; (p. 258). &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; The study design allowed for the comparison of the comparative power and robustness of the Wilcoxon-Signed Ranks-Test, rank difference test, and the t-test. Utilizing five distributions (Normal, chi-square, df = 1, chi-square, df = 2, chi-square, df = 8, and t distribution, df = 3) and three sample sizes (10, 10), (15, 15), and (20, 20). All distributions and their data sets were created by using a pseudo-random number generator, via Monte Carlo simulation, using Fortran 77.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; The results showed the t-test had power advantages over the Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks test and the rank differences, but with explanation. There was no evidence within the results to confirm that the rank difference test had substantial power advantages over Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks test.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Haidous, Norman"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Open Access Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Education Evaluation and Research","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Shlomo Sawilowsky"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2012,"date_issued":"2012-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2012-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:59:11Z","subjects":["non parametric statistics","Rank Difference Test","t-test","Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks","Statistics and Probability"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/oa_dissertations/596","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Shlomo Sawilowsky"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Haidous, Norman"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2012-01-01T08:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Education Evaluation and Research"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Open Access Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["non parametric statistics","Rank Difference Test","t-test","Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks","Statistics and Probability"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/oa_dissertations/596"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p> <strong>ABSTRACT</strong> </p> <p> <strong>ROBUSTNESS AND POWER OF THE KORNBROT RANK DIFFERENCE, SIGNED RANKS, AND DEPENDENT SAMPLES T-TEST</strong> </p> <p>by</p> <p> <strong>NORMAN N. HAIDOUS</strong> </p> <p>December 2012</p> <p> <strong>Advisor:</strong>Dr. Shlomo S. Sawilowsky</p> <p> <strong>Major:</strong>Evaluation and Research - Statistics</p> <p> <strong>Degree:</strong>Doctor of Philosophy</p> <p> The purpose of the study was to compare the power and accuracy of the Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks test in comparison to the rank difference test when the assumption of normality is not met, the data are ordinal, and the sample size is small. The study also investigated Kornbrot's (1990) claim that the rank difference test should be used over the Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks tests \"in all paired comparison designs where the data are not both of internal scale type and of known distribution time\" (p. 258). </p> <p> The study design allowed for the comparison of the comparative power and robustness of the Wilcoxon-Signed Ranks-Test, rank difference test, and the t-test. Utilizing five distributions (Normal, chi-square, df = 1, chi-square, df = 2, chi-square, df = 8, and t distribution, df = 3) and three sample sizes (10, 10), (15, 15), and (20, 20). All distributions and their data sets were created by using a pseudo-random number generator, via Monte Carlo simulation, using Fortran 77.</p> <p> The results showed the t-test had power advantages over the Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks test and the rank differences, but with explanation. There was no evidence within the results to confirm that the rank difference test had substantial power advantages over Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks test.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Robustness And Power Of The Kornbrot Rank Difference, Signed Ranks, And Dependent Samples T-Test"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Shlomo Sawilowsky"],"dc:creator":["Haidous, Norman"],"dc:date.available":["2012-01-01T08:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p> <strong>ABSTRACT</strong> </p> <p> <strong>ROBUSTNESS AND POWER OF THE KORNBROT RANK DIFFERENCE, SIGNED RANKS, AND DEPENDENT SAMPLES T-TEST</strong> </p> <p>by</p> <p> <strong>NORMAN N. HAIDOUS</strong> </p> <p>December 2012</p> <p> <strong>Advisor:</strong>Dr. Shlomo S. Sawilowsky</p> <p> <strong>Major:</strong>Evaluation and Research - Statistics</p> <p> <strong>Degree:</strong>Doctor of Philosophy</p> <p> The purpose of the study was to compare the power and accuracy of the Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks test in comparison to the rank difference test when the assumption of normality is not met, the data are ordinal, and the sample size is small. The study also investigated Kornbrot's (1990) claim that the rank difference test should be used over the Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks tests \"in all paired comparison designs where the data are not both of internal scale type and of known distribution time\" (p. 258). </p> <p> The study design allowed for the comparison of the comparative power and robustness of the Wilcoxon-Signed Ranks-Test, rank difference test, and the t-test. Utilizing five distributions (Normal, chi-square, df = 1, chi-square, df = 2, chi-square, df = 8, and t distribution, df = 3) and three sample sizes (10, 10), (15, 15), and (20, 20). All distributions and their data sets were created by using a pseudo-random number generator, via Monte Carlo simulation, using Fortran 77.</p> <p> The results showed the t-test had power advantages over the Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks test and the rank differences, but with explanation. There was no evidence within the results to confirm that the rank difference test had substantial power advantages over Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks test.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/oa_dissertations/596"],"dc:subject":["non parametric statistics","Rank Difference Test","t-test","Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks","Statistics and Probability"],"dc:title":["Robustness And Power Of The Kornbrot Rank Difference, Signed Ranks, And Dependent Samples T-Test"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Education Evaluation and Research"],"thesis:degree_level":["Open Access Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:59:11Z"}