{"id":{"repo_id":"washington","oai_identifier":"oai:digital.lib.washington.edu:1773/43069"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/washington/oai:digital.lib.washington.edu:1773/43069","repository":{"repo_id":"washington","name":"University of Washington","base_url":"https://digital.lib.washington.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Using Lidar Data to Predict Photo Interpreted Attributes","abstract":"Large datasets and robust workflows exist for both the photo interpretation and Lidar methodologies. Both methodologies have unique and non-overlapping strengths in describing forest conditions. Bridging the data products of these methodologies would expand the capabilities for both approaches. To my knowledge no previous studies have attempted to evaluate the comparability of photo interpretation datasets and Lidar data products. In this study I attempted to develop methods that incorporate Lidar products into the photo interpretation process, and evaluate the comparability of Lidar products to photo interpretation attributes. I evaluated correlations between photo interpretation attributes and logical analog Lidar data products. I developed models to predict photo interpretation attributes using Lidar data products and predictor variables. I summarized photo interpretation attributes and equivalent Lidar predicted attributes using watershed scale spatial pattern metrics to evaluate the substitutability of the datasets in a mid-scale analysis scenario. Models of photo interpretation attributes describing Overstory Canopy Cover performed better than those describing characteristics of Understory Canopy Cover. Models performed poorly in exact matching of photo interpretation classification, but frequently predicted classes within one class of observed values for ordinal metrics. Comparisons of watershed scale summary metrics produced mixed results.","abstract_html":"Large datasets and robust workflows exist for both the photo interpretation and Lidar methodologies. Both methodologies have unique and non-overlapping strengths in describing forest conditions. Bridging the data products of these methodologies would expand the capabilities for both approaches. To my knowledge no previous studies have attempted to evaluate the comparability of photo interpretation datasets and Lidar data products. In this study I attempted to develop methods that incorporate Lidar products into the photo interpretation process, and evaluate the comparability of Lidar products to photo interpretation attributes. I evaluated correlations between photo interpretation attributes and logical analog Lidar data products. I developed models to predict photo interpretation attributes using Lidar data products and predictor variables. I summarized photo interpretation attributes and equivalent Lidar predicted attributes using watershed scale spatial pattern metrics to evaluate the substitutability of the datasets in a mid-scale analysis scenario. Models of photo interpretation attributes describing Overstory Canopy Cover performed better than those describing characteristics of Understory Canopy Cover. Models performed poorly in exact matching of photo interpretation classification, but frequently predicted classes within one class of observed values for ordinal metrics. Comparisons of watershed scale summary metrics produced mixed results.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["LeFevre, Miles Elliot"],"institution":null,"degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Franklin, Jerry F","Kane, Van"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2018,"date_issued":"2018-11-28","date_published":"2018-11-28","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:58:16Z","subjects":["Landscape Evaluation","Lidar","Machine Learning","Photo Interpretation","Remote Sensing","Forestry"],"languages":["en_US"],"rights":["CC BY-SA"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/1773/43069","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Franklin, Jerry F","Kane, Van"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["LeFevre, Miles Elliot"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2018-11-28T03:18:36Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2018-11-28T03:18:36Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2018-11-28"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Landscape Evaluation","Lidar","Machine Learning","Photo Interpretation","Remote Sensing","Forestry"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en_US"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["CC BY-SA"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["LeFevre_washington_0250O_19073.pdf"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/1773/43069"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2018"]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Large datasets and robust workflows exist for both the photo interpretation and Lidar methodologies. Both methodologies have unique and non-overlapping strengths in describing forest conditions. Bridging the data products of these methodologies would expand the capabilities for both approaches. To my knowledge no previous studies have attempted to evaluate the comparability of photo interpretation datasets and Lidar data products. In this study I attempted to develop methods that incorporate Lidar products into the photo interpretation process, and evaluate the comparability of Lidar products to photo interpretation attributes. I evaluated correlations between photo interpretation attributes and logical analog Lidar data products. I developed models to predict photo interpretation attributes using Lidar data products and predictor variables. I summarized photo interpretation attributes and equivalent Lidar predicted attributes using watershed scale spatial pattern metrics to evaluate the substitutability of the datasets in a mid-scale analysis scenario. Models of photo interpretation attributes describing Overstory Canopy Cover performed better than those describing characteristics of Understory Canopy Cover. Models performed poorly in exact matching of photo interpretation classification, but frequently predicted classes within one class of observed values for ordinal metrics. Comparisons of watershed scale summary metrics produced mixed results."]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Using Lidar Data to Predict Photo Interpreted Attributes"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Franklin, Jerry F","Kane, Van"],"dc:creator":["LeFevre, Miles Elliot"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2018-11-28T03:18:36Z"],"dc:date.available":["2018-11-28T03:18:36Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2018-11-28"],"dc:description":["Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2018"],"dc:description.abstract":["Large datasets and robust workflows exist for both the photo interpretation and Lidar methodologies. Both methodologies have unique and non-overlapping strengths in describing forest conditions. Bridging the data products of these methodologies would expand the capabilities for both approaches. To my knowledge no previous studies have attempted to evaluate the comparability of photo interpretation datasets and Lidar data products. In this study I attempted to develop methods that incorporate Lidar products into the photo interpretation process, and evaluate the comparability of Lidar products to photo interpretation attributes. I evaluated correlations between photo interpretation attributes and logical analog Lidar data products. I developed models to predict photo interpretation attributes using Lidar data products and predictor variables. I summarized photo interpretation attributes and equivalent Lidar predicted attributes using watershed scale spatial pattern metrics to evaluate the substitutability of the datasets in a mid-scale analysis scenario. Models of photo interpretation attributes describing Overstory Canopy Cover performed better than those describing characteristics of Understory Canopy Cover. Models performed poorly in exact matching of photo interpretation classification, but frequently predicted classes within one class of observed values for ordinal metrics. Comparisons of watershed scale summary metrics produced mixed results."],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.other":["LeFevre_washington_0250O_19073.pdf"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/1773/43069"],"dc:language.iso":["en_US"],"dc:rights":["CC BY-SA"],"dc:subject":["Landscape Evaluation","Lidar","Machine Learning","Photo Interpretation","Remote Sensing","Forestry"],"dc:title":["Using Lidar Data to Predict Photo Interpreted Attributes"],"dc:type":["Thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:58:16Z"}