{"id":{"repo_id":"washington","oai_identifier":"oai:digital.lib.washington.edu:1773/42153"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/washington/oai:digital.lib.washington.edu:1773/42153","repository":{"repo_id":"washington","name":"University of Washington","base_url":"https://digital.lib.washington.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Unsustainable and Uncontrolled: Framing Immigration During the Brexit Campaign","abstract":"The British vote to leave the European Union in 2016 came as a major surprise to politicians and scholars. Pre-referendum scholarship indicated that while British voters had concerns about cultural issues, such as identity and immigration, they would ultimately decide based on economic considerations. However, post-referendum voter surveys and scholarship showed that immigration was a key issue for many Leave and Undecided voters. This paper addresses why immigration was such a significant issue, and why it was so closely tied to leaving the EU, by discussing how the official campaigns and print media sources prioritized and characterized the issue. I argue that the relative prominence of immigration in media coverage, and the increased likelihood that newspapers would use Leave-associated frames, which also corresponded with pre-existing negative attitudes towards immigrants, contributed to immigration’s overall salience and strong ties to Leave.","abstract_html":"The British vote to leave the European Union in 2016 came as a major surprise to politicians and scholars. Pre-referendum scholarship indicated that while British voters had concerns about cultural issues, such as identity and immigration, they would ultimately decide based on economic considerations. However, post-referendum voter surveys and scholarship showed that immigration was a key issue for many Leave and Undecided voters. This paper addresses why immigration was such a significant issue, and why it was so closely tied to leaving the EU, by discussing how the official campaigns and print media sources prioritized and characterized the issue. I argue that the relative prominence of immigration in media coverage, and the increased likelihood that newspapers would use Leave-associated frames, which also corresponded with pre-existing negative attitudes towards immigrants, contributed to immigration’s overall salience and strong ties to Leave.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Van Horne, Jessica Marie"],"institution":null,"degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Friedman, Kathie"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2018,"date_issued":"2018-07-31","date_published":"2018-07-31","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:58:12Z","subjects":["Agenda-setting","Brexit","European Union","Framing","Political communications","United Kingdom","Public policy","Communication","European studies"],"languages":["en_US"],"rights":["CC BY-NC-ND"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/1773/42153","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Friedman, Kathie"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Van Horne, Jessica Marie"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2018-07-31T21:08:06Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2018-07-31"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Agenda-setting","Brexit","European Union","Framing","Political communications","United Kingdom","Public policy","Communication","European studies"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en_US"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["CC BY-NC-ND"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["VanHorne_washington_0250O_18593.pdf"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/1773/42153"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2018"]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The British vote to leave the European Union in 2016 came as a major surprise to politicians and scholars. Pre-referendum scholarship indicated that while British voters had concerns about cultural issues, such as identity and immigration, they would ultimately decide based on economic considerations. However, post-referendum voter surveys and scholarship showed that immigration was a key issue for many Leave and Undecided voters. This paper addresses why immigration was such a significant issue, and why it was so closely tied to leaving the EU, by discussing how the official campaigns and print media sources prioritized and characterized the issue. I argue that the relative prominence of immigration in media coverage, and the increased likelihood that newspapers would use Leave-associated frames, which also corresponded with pre-existing negative attitudes towards immigrants, contributed to immigration’s overall salience and strong ties to Leave."]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Unsustainable and Uncontrolled: Framing Immigration During the Brexit Campaign"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Friedman, Kathie"],"dc:creator":["Van Horne, Jessica Marie"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2018-07-31T21:08:06Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2018-07-31"],"dc:description":["Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2018"],"dc:description.abstract":["The British vote to leave the European Union in 2016 came as a major surprise to politicians and scholars. Pre-referendum scholarship indicated that while British voters had concerns about cultural issues, such as identity and immigration, they would ultimately decide based on economic considerations. However, post-referendum voter surveys and scholarship showed that immigration was a key issue for many Leave and Undecided voters. This paper addresses why immigration was such a significant issue, and why it was so closely tied to leaving the EU, by discussing how the official campaigns and print media sources prioritized and characterized the issue. I argue that the relative prominence of immigration in media coverage, and the increased likelihood that newspapers would use Leave-associated frames, which also corresponded with pre-existing negative attitudes towards immigrants, contributed to immigration’s overall salience and strong ties to Leave."],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.other":["VanHorne_washington_0250O_18593.pdf"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/1773/42153"],"dc:language.iso":["en_US"],"dc:rights":["CC BY-NC-ND"],"dc:subject":["Agenda-setting","Brexit","European Union","Framing","Political communications","United Kingdom","Public policy","Communication","European studies"],"dc:title":["Unsustainable and Uncontrolled: Framing Immigration During the Brexit Campaign"],"dc:type":["Thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:58:12Z"}