{"id":{"repo_id":"washington","oai_identifier":"oai:digital.lib.washington.edu:1773/42021"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/washington/oai:digital.lib.washington.edu:1773/42021","repository":{"repo_id":"washington","name":"University of Washington","base_url":"https://digital.lib.washington.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"The Bully Pulpit on Display: How Presidential Libraries Present Presidential History","abstract":"Scholars have portrayed presidential libraries and museums as either whitewashed and propagandist temples to presidents or highly valuable institutions of American democracy. However, the literature lacks a discussion of the curatorial process for creating the contested exhibits and the choices that were made in that process, leaving out a conversation of curatorial voice and authority in presidential libraries. The purpose of this study was to identify the curatorial choices made in presenting presidential history in presidential library and museum exhibitions. Qualitative data collected from curators at nine of the 13 presidential libraries operated by the National Archives and Records Association (NARA) were collected in this phenomenological study. Findings suggested that a major goal of presenting presidential history was to showcase the significance of the president, especially focused on accomplishments, relevancy, and legacy. Additionally, findings indicate that curatorial authority was kept to the individual libraries rather than NARA or the president’s private foundation.","abstract_html":"Scholars have portrayed presidential libraries and museums as either whitewashed and propagandist temples to presidents or highly valuable institutions of American democracy. However, the literature lacks a discussion of the curatorial process for creating the contested exhibits and the choices that were made in that process, leaving out a conversation of curatorial voice and authority in presidential libraries. The purpose of this study was to identify the curatorial choices made in presenting presidential history in presidential library and museum exhibitions. Qualitative data collected from curators at nine of the 13 presidential libraries operated by the National Archives and Records Association (NARA) were collected in this phenomenological study. Findings suggested that a major goal of presenting presidential history was to showcase the significance of the president, especially focused on accomplishments, relevancy, and legacy. Additionally, findings indicate that curatorial authority was kept to the individual libraries rather than NARA or the president’s private foundation.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Forsberg, Becky"],"institution":null,"degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["O'Donnell, Wilson"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2018,"date_issued":"2018-07-31","date_published":"2018-07-31","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:58:23Z","subjects":["curatorial authority","NARA","National Archives","presidential libraries","Museum studies"],"languages":["en_US"],"rights":["CC BY-NC-SA"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/1773/42021","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["O'Donnell, Wilson"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Forsberg, Becky"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2018-07-31T21:05:19Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2018-07-31T21:05:19Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2018-07-31"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["curatorial authority","NARA","National Archives","presidential libraries","Museum studies"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en_US"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["CC BY-NC-SA"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["Forsberg_washington_0250O_18775.pdf"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/1773/42021"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2018"]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Scholars have portrayed presidential libraries and museums as either whitewashed and propagandist temples to presidents or highly valuable institutions of American democracy. However, the literature lacks a discussion of the curatorial process for creating the contested exhibits and the choices that were made in that process, leaving out a conversation of curatorial voice and authority in presidential libraries. The purpose of this study was to identify the curatorial choices made in presenting presidential history in presidential library and museum exhibitions. Qualitative data collected from curators at nine of the 13 presidential libraries operated by the National Archives and Records Association (NARA) were collected in this phenomenological study. Findings suggested that a major goal of presenting presidential history was to showcase the significance of the president, especially focused on accomplishments, relevancy, and legacy. Additionally, findings indicate that curatorial authority was kept to the individual libraries rather than NARA or the president’s private foundation."]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Bully Pulpit on Display: How Presidential Libraries Present Presidential History"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["O'Donnell, Wilson"],"dc:creator":["Forsberg, Becky"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2018-07-31T21:05:19Z"],"dc:date.available":["2018-07-31T21:05:19Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2018-07-31"],"dc:description":["Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2018"],"dc:description.abstract":["Scholars have portrayed presidential libraries and museums as either whitewashed and propagandist temples to presidents or highly valuable institutions of American democracy. However, the literature lacks a discussion of the curatorial process for creating the contested exhibits and the choices that were made in that process, leaving out a conversation of curatorial voice and authority in presidential libraries. The purpose of this study was to identify the curatorial choices made in presenting presidential history in presidential library and museum exhibitions. Qualitative data collected from curators at nine of the 13 presidential libraries operated by the National Archives and Records Association (NARA) were collected in this phenomenological study. Findings suggested that a major goal of presenting presidential history was to showcase the significance of the president, especially focused on accomplishments, relevancy, and legacy. Additionally, findings indicate that curatorial authority was kept to the individual libraries rather than NARA or the president’s private foundation."],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.other":["Forsberg_washington_0250O_18775.pdf"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/1773/42021"],"dc:language.iso":["en_US"],"dc:rights":["CC BY-NC-SA"],"dc:subject":["curatorial authority","NARA","National Archives","presidential libraries","Museum studies"],"dc:title":["The Bully Pulpit on Display: How Presidential Libraries Present Presidential History"],"dc:type":["Thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:58:23Z"}