{"id":{"repo_id":"washington","oai_identifier":"oai:digital.lib.washington.edu:1773/22426"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/washington/oai:digital.lib.washington.edu:1773/22426","repository":{"repo_id":"washington","name":"University of Washington","base_url":"https://digital.lib.washington.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Return of Aggregate Results in Biorepository Research: An Exploratory Study of Participant Perspectives and Preferences","abstract":"This thesis reports a preliminary exploration of participant preferences and perspectives on the necessity for, and mode of, returning aggregate (or summary) results of genomic biorepository research. Fifteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with members of the Northwest Institute of Genetic Medicine (NWIGM) cohort. Participants reported a desire for individual results, and expressed a clear preference for allocating funds designated for return of summary results to additional research. In the event that aggregate results were to be returned, the participants of this exploratory study preferred to receive them in the form of emails, letters, or websites rather than in-person interviews or phone calls. The results of this preliminary research suggest that individuals be consulted regarding preferences prior to formation of overarching policy regarding aggregate return, and indicate that further research with larger and more representative cohorts is warranted.","abstract_html":"This thesis reports a preliminary exploration of participant preferences and perspectives on the necessity for, and mode of, returning aggregate (or summary) results of genomic biorepository research. Fifteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with members of the Northwest Institute of Genetic Medicine (NWIGM) cohort. Participants reported a desire for individual results, and expressed a clear preference for allocating funds designated for return of summary results to additional research. In the event that aggregate results were to be returned, the participants of this exploratory study preferred to receive them in the form of emails, letters, or websites rather than in-person interviews or phone calls. The results of this preliminary research suggest that individuals be consulted regarding preferences prior to formation of overarching policy regarding aggregate return, and indicate that further research with larger and more representative cohorts is warranted.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Bane, Emily Alaina"],"institution":null,"degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Fullerton, Stephanie M"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2013,"date_issued":"2013-04-17","date_published":"2013-04-17","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:58:05Z","subjects":["Biobank; Biorepository; Ethics; Genetics; Policy; Research"],"languages":["en_US"],"rights":["Copyright is held by the individual authors."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/1773/22426","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Fullerton, Stephanie M"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Bane, Emily Alaina"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2013-04-17T17:56:33Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2013-04-17T17:56:33Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2013-04-17"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Biobank; Biorepository; Ethics; Genetics; Policy; Research"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en_US"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright is held by the individual authors."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["Bane_washington_0250O_11251.pdf"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/1773/22426"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2012"]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This thesis reports a preliminary exploration of participant preferences and perspectives on the necessity for, and mode of, returning aggregate (or summary) results of genomic biorepository research. Fifteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with members of the Northwest Institute of Genetic Medicine (NWIGM) cohort. Participants reported a desire for individual results, and expressed a clear preference for allocating funds designated for return of summary results to additional research. In the event that aggregate results were to be returned, the participants of this exploratory study preferred to receive them in the form of emails, letters, or websites rather than in-person interviews or phone calls. The results of this preliminary research suggest that individuals be consulted regarding preferences prior to formation of overarching policy regarding aggregate return, and indicate that further research with larger and more representative cohorts is warranted."]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Return of Aggregate Results in Biorepository Research: An Exploratory Study of Participant Perspectives and Preferences"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Fullerton, Stephanie M"],"dc:creator":["Bane, Emily Alaina"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2013-04-17T17:56:33Z"],"dc:date.available":["2013-04-17T17:56:33Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2013-04-17"],"dc:description":["Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2012"],"dc:description.abstract":["This thesis reports a preliminary exploration of participant preferences and perspectives on the necessity for, and mode of, returning aggregate (or summary) results of genomic biorepository research. Fifteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with members of the Northwest Institute of Genetic Medicine (NWIGM) cohort. Participants reported a desire for individual results, and expressed a clear preference for allocating funds designated for return of summary results to additional research. In the event that aggregate results were to be returned, the participants of this exploratory study preferred to receive them in the form of emails, letters, or websites rather than in-person interviews or phone calls. The results of this preliminary research suggest that individuals be consulted regarding preferences prior to formation of overarching policy regarding aggregate return, and indicate that further research with larger and more representative cohorts is warranted."],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.other":["Bane_washington_0250O_11251.pdf"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/1773/22426"],"dc:language.iso":["en_US"],"dc:rights":["Copyright is held by the individual authors."],"dc:subject":["Biobank; Biorepository; Ethics; Genetics; Policy; Research"],"dc:title":["Return of Aggregate Results in Biorepository Research: An Exploratory Study of Participant Perspectives and Preferences"],"dc:type":["Thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:58:05Z"}