{"id":{"repo_id":"vu-aus","oai_identifier":"oai:eprints.vu.edu.au:21294"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/vu-aus/oai:eprints.vu.edu.au:21294","repository":{"repo_id":"vu-aus","name":"Victoria University (Australia)","base_url":"https://vuir.vu.edu.au/cgi/oai2"},"display":{"title":"The problem of the poetic revolutionary","abstract":"This thesis is a critical and creative exploration of the dynamics by which intertextual literary practices can gain critical and transformative traction in their sociocultural context. From an introduction considering recent debates about the cultural politics of parody, pastiche, and intertextuality allied to avant-garde practice, the study proceeds to an exploration of texts by writers for whom formal and poetic experimentation is allied to a subversive politics: Jean Genet, Monique Wittig, Angela Carter, Kathy Acker, Kathleen Mary Fallon, Kim Scott and Brian Castro. Drawing on theories of intertextuality, parody, representation, and performance from theorists such as Mikhaïl Bakhtin, Julia Kristeva, Gérard Genette, Margaret A. Rose, Linda Hutcheon, Fredric Jameson, Ross Chambers and Judith Butler, these readings explore how a confluence of writing strategies – covering the stylistic, structural, narratological, and scenographic – can work to boost or inhibit a text’s subversive power. The dissertation argues that textual imitation gains its strongest critical and political purchase when it foregrounds its own modes of representation, whether this is on stage or in the scene projected through the writing. The dissertation concludes that, if texts do not act directly on the world, a combination of compositional montage, heteroglossic writing practice, selfreflexive scenography, and carnivalesque writing of the body can deliver an effective critique of oppressive modes of representation. By deconstructing discourses and images whereby power and capital seduce, subjugate, or exclude, by foregrounding the play of contradictions and voices within its own productivity, radical textual practice can also embolden resistance. The literary-critical dissertation is companioned by a creative work, konkretion, which enacts some of the critical subversions examined in the dissertation and explores the cultural relations of poetry and revolution, staging a dialogue between two writers around a poem sequence revisiting the Baader-Meinhof group with a special focus on Ulrike Meinhof and Gudrun Ensslin.","abstract_html":"This thesis is a critical and creative exploration of the dynamics by which intertextual literary practices can gain critical and transformative traction in their sociocultural context. From an introduction considering recent debates about the cultural politics of parody, pastiche, and intertextuality allied to avant-garde practice, the study proceeds to an exploration of texts by writers for whom formal and poetic experimentation is allied to a subversive politics: Jean Genet, Monique Wittig, Angela Carter, Kathy Acker, Kathleen Mary Fallon, Kim Scott and Brian Castro. Drawing on theories of intertextuality, parody, representation, and performance from theorists such as Mikhaïl Bakhtin, Julia Kristeva, Gérard Genette, Margaret A. Rose, Linda Hutcheon, Fredric Jameson, Ross Chambers and Judith Butler, these readings explore how a confluence of writing strategies – covering the stylistic, structural, narratological, and scenographic – can work to boost or inhibit a text’s subversive power. The dissertation argues that textual imitation gains its strongest critical and political purchase when it foregrounds its own modes of representation, whether this is on stage or in the scene projected through the writing. The dissertation concludes that, if texts do not act directly on the world, a combination of compositional montage, heteroglossic writing practice, selfreflexive scenography, and carnivalesque writing of the body can deliver an effective critique of oppressive modes of representation. By deconstructing discourses and images whereby power and capital seduce, subjugate, or exclude, by foregrounding the play of contradictions and voices within its own productivity, radical textual practice can also embolden resistance. The literary-critical dissertation is companioned by a creative work, konkretion, which enacts some of the critical subversions examined in the dissertation and explores the cultural relations of poetry and revolution, staging a dialogue between two writers around a poem sequence revisiting the Baader-Meinhof group with a special focus on Ulrike Meinhof and Gudrun Ensslin.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Campbell, Marion May"],"institution":"Victoria University","degree_name":"phd","degree_level":"doctoral","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011","date_published":"2011","updated_at":"2026-07-24T06:33:28Z","subjects":["School of Communication and the Arts","1904 Performing Arts and Creative Writing","2005 Literary Studies"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":null,"outbound_label":null,"outbound_source":null},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Campbell, Marion May"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2011"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2011"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.department","label":"Dc Publisher Department","values":["School of Communication and the Arts"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["Victoria University"]},{"key":"dc:relation.isreferencedby","label":"Dc Relation Isreferencedby","values":["https://vuir.vu.edu.au/21294/"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["doctoral"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationname","label":"Dc Type Qualificationname","values":["phd"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["School of Communication and the Arts","1904 Performing Arts and Creative Writing","2005 Literary Studies"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This thesis is a critical and creative exploration of the dynamics by which intertextual literary practices can gain critical and transformative traction in their sociocultural context. From an introduction considering recent debates about the cultural politics of parody, pastiche, and intertextuality allied to avant-garde practice, the study proceeds to an exploration of texts by writers for whom formal and poetic experimentation is allied to a subversive politics: Jean Genet, Monique Wittig, Angela Carter, Kathy Acker, Kathleen Mary Fallon, Kim Scott and Brian Castro. Drawing on theories of intertextuality, parody, representation, and performance from theorists such as Mikhaïl Bakhtin, Julia Kristeva, Gérard Genette, Margaret A. Rose, Linda Hutcheon, Fredric Jameson, Ross Chambers and Judith Butler, these readings explore how a confluence of writing strategies – covering the stylistic, structural, narratological, and scenographic – can work to boost or inhibit a text’s subversive power. The dissertation argues that textual imitation gains its strongest critical and political purchase when it foregrounds its own modes of representation, whether this is on stage or in the scene projected through the writing. The dissertation concludes that, if texts do not act directly on the world, a combination of compositional montage, heteroglossic writing practice, selfreflexive scenography, and carnivalesque writing of the body can deliver an effective critique of oppressive modes of representation. By deconstructing discourses and images whereby power and capital seduce, subjugate, or exclude, by foregrounding the play of contradictions and voices within its own productivity, radical textual practice can also embolden resistance. The literary-critical dissertation is companioned by a creative work, konkretion, which enacts some of the critical subversions examined in the dissertation and explores the cultural relations of poetry and revolution, staging a dialogue between two writers around a poem sequence revisiting the Baader-Meinhof group with a special focus on Ulrike Meinhof and Gudrun Ensslin."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The problem of the poetic revolutionary"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Campbell, Marion May"],"dc:date":["2011"],"dc:date.issued":["2011"],"dc:description.abstract":["This thesis is a critical and creative exploration of the dynamics by which intertextual literary practices can gain critical and transformative traction in their sociocultural context. From an introduction considering recent debates about the cultural politics of parody, pastiche, and intertextuality allied to avant-garde practice, the study proceeds to an exploration of texts by writers for whom formal and poetic experimentation is allied to a subversive politics: Jean Genet, Monique Wittig, Angela Carter, Kathy Acker, Kathleen Mary Fallon, Kim Scott and Brian Castro. Drawing on theories of intertextuality, parody, representation, and performance from theorists such as Mikhaïl Bakhtin, Julia Kristeva, Gérard Genette, Margaret A. Rose, Linda Hutcheon, Fredric Jameson, Ross Chambers and Judith Butler, these readings explore how a confluence of writing strategies – covering the stylistic, structural, narratological, and scenographic – can work to boost or inhibit a text’s subversive power. The dissertation argues that textual imitation gains its strongest critical and political purchase when it foregrounds its own modes of representation, whether this is on stage or in the scene projected through the writing. The dissertation concludes that, if texts do not act directly on the world, a combination of compositional montage, heteroglossic writing practice, selfreflexive scenography, and carnivalesque writing of the body can deliver an effective critique of oppressive modes of representation. By deconstructing discourses and images whereby power and capital seduce, subjugate, or exclude, by foregrounding the play of contradictions and voices within its own productivity, radical textual practice can also embolden resistance. The literary-critical dissertation is companioned by a creative work, konkretion, which enacts some of the critical subversions examined in the dissertation and explores the cultural relations of poetry and revolution, staging a dialogue between two writers around a poem sequence revisiting the Baader-Meinhof group with a special focus on Ulrike Meinhof and Gudrun Ensslin."],"dc:publisher.department":["School of Communication and the Arts"],"dc:publisher.institution":["Victoria University"],"dc:relation.isreferencedby":["https://vuir.vu.edu.au/21294/"],"dc:subject":["School of Communication and the Arts","1904 Performing Arts and Creative Writing","2005 Literary Studies"],"dc:title":["The problem of the poetic revolutionary"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["doctoral"],"dc:type.qualificationname":["phd"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T06:33:28Z"}