{"id":{"repo_id":"vt","oai_identifier":"oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/87248"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/vt/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/87248","repository":{"repo_id":"vt","name":"Virginia Tech","base_url":"https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"An analysis of union-avoidance techniques and NLRB election outcomes","abstract":"Although the overall effect of labor unions represents a point of disagreement, most companies prefer not to have their employees represented by a union. The interest in preserving nonunion status has lead to the development of many diverse means of deterring unionization. These techniques are primarily provided by academicians who usually engage in empirical research, and by labor practitioners who base their writing on personal experience. This study serves to bring together the various techniques of union-avoidance, presenting those techniques as long-term, \"preventive\" actions, or as short-term responses to actual organizational activity. Further, the study examined the value of these techniques in actually deterring unionization. Finally, the study examined the possibility that a relatively few, particular techniques of union-avoidance were specially effective in preserving non-union status. Correlation and frequency analysis indicate that several of the techniques appearing in the literature are, in fact, related to company election victory. Other techniques, as identified in the literature, were not related to election outcome. Seven specific union-avoidance techniques were primarily responsible for distinguishing election losers from election winners. Companies which hope to remain non-union must be prepared to implement programs which are actually effective in deterring unionization. Failure to develop such programs will be unnecessarily costly and ineffective.","abstract_html":"Although the overall effect of labor unions represents a point of disagreement, most companies prefer not to have their employees represented by a union. The interest in preserving nonunion status has lead to the development of many diverse means of deterring unionization. These techniques are primarily provided by academicians who usually engage in empirical research, and by labor practitioners who base their writing on personal experience. This study serves to bring together the various techniques of union-avoidance, presenting those techniques as long-term, "preventive" actions, or as short-term responses to actual organizational activity. Further, the study examined the value of these techniques in actually deterring unionization. Finally, the study examined the possibility that a relatively few, particular techniques of union-avoidance were specially effective in preserving non-union status. Correlation and frequency analysis indicate that several of the techniques appearing in the literature are, in fact, related to company election victory. Other techniques, as identified in the literature, were not related to election outcome. Seven specific union-avoidance techniques were primarily responsible for distinguishing election losers from election winners. Companies which hope to remain non-union must be prepared to implement programs which are actually effective in deterring unionization. Failure to develop such programs will be unnecessarily costly and ineffective.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Porter, Andrew Alexander"],"institution":"Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University","degree_name":"Master of Science","degree_level":"masters","degree_discipline":"Business Administration","degree_department":"Business Administration","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1982,"date_issued":"1982","date_published":"1982","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:19:21Z","subjects":[],"languages":["en_US"],"rights":["In Copyright"],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10919/87248","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Business Administration"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Porter, Andrew Alexander"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2019-01-31T18:27:31Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2019-01-31T18:27:31Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["1982"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.dcmitype","label":"Dc Type Dcmitype","values":["Text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Business Administration"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en_US"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright"]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/87248"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Although the overall effect of labor unions represents a point of disagreement, most companies prefer not to have their employees represented by a union. The interest in preserving nonunion status has lead to the development of many diverse means of deterring unionization. These techniques are primarily provided by academicians who usually engage in empirical research, and by labor practitioners who base their writing on personal experience. This study serves to bring together the various techniques of union-avoidance, presenting those techniques as long-term, \"preventive\" actions, or as short-term responses to actual organizational activity. Further, the study examined the value of these techniques in actually deterring unionization. Finally, the study examined the possibility that a relatively few, particular techniques of union-avoidance were specially effective in preserving non-union status. Correlation and frequency analysis indicate that several of the techniques appearing in the literature are, in fact, related to company election victory. Other techniques, as identified in the literature, were not related to election outcome. Seven specific union-avoidance techniques were primarily responsible for distinguishing election losers from election winners. Companies which hope to remain non-union must be prepared to implement programs which are actually effective in deterring unionization. Failure to develop such programs will be unnecessarily costly and ineffective."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["Master of Science"]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["An analysis of union-avoidance techniques and NLRB election outcomes"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.department":["Business Administration"],"dc:creator":["Porter, Andrew Alexander"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2019-01-31T18:27:31Z"],"dc:date.available":["2019-01-31T18:27:31Z"],"dc:date.issued":["1982"],"dc:description.abstract":["Although the overall effect of labor unions represents a point of disagreement, most companies prefer not to have their employees represented by a union. The interest in preserving nonunion status has lead to the development of many diverse means of deterring unionization. These techniques are primarily provided by academicians who usually engage in empirical research, and by labor practitioners who base their writing on personal experience. This study serves to bring together the various techniques of union-avoidance, presenting those techniques as long-term, \"preventive\" actions, or as short-term responses to actual organizational activity. Further, the study examined the value of these techniques in actually deterring unionization. Finally, the study examined the possibility that a relatively few, particular techniques of union-avoidance were specially effective in preserving non-union status. Correlation and frequency analysis indicate that several of the techniques appearing in the literature are, in fact, related to company election victory. Other techniques, as identified in the literature, were not related to election outcome. Seven specific union-avoidance techniques were primarily responsible for distinguishing election losers from election winners. Companies which hope to remain non-union must be prepared to implement programs which are actually effective in deterring unionization. Failure to develop such programs will be unnecessarily costly and ineffective."],"dc:description.degree":["Master of Science"],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/87248"],"dc:language.iso":["en_US"],"dc:publisher":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright"],"dc:rights.uri":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:title":["An analysis of union-avoidance techniques and NLRB election outcomes"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.dcmitype":["Text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Business Administration"],"thesis:degree_level":["masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science"],"thesis:institution_name":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:19:21Z"}