{"id":{"repo_id":"vt","oai_identifier":"oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/87123"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/vt/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/87123","repository":{"repo_id":"vt","name":"Virginia Tech","base_url":"https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Modification of a physical education experimental teaching unit","abstract":"This study was undertaken to research and modify the Georgia Project hockey/golf Physical Education Experimental Teaching Unit (PEETU). The PEETU is a short instructional unit involving a pre-test, instructional period, and posttest. The object of the PEETU instructional skill is to hit a tennis ball into a hoop in the least amount of strokes (hits). The modification of the PEETU consisted of simply lengthening the distance between the starting line and the hoop from thirty yards to forty-five yards. It was hypothesized that the reverse chaining method of teaching would not cause greater significant learning than the lecture/demonstration method, and that Academic Learning Time-Physical Education(M) (Motor ALT) would not be a better student process indicator for achievement independently of instructional method or length of the PEETU. The results indicated there were no significant differences between teaching methods or instructional periods within the PEETU. The results also indicated that Motor ALT is an important student process indicator when the student received between two and seven minutes of Motor ALT during the instructional period of the PEETU.","abstract_html":"This study was undertaken to research and modify the Georgia Project hockey/golf Physical Education Experimental Teaching Unit (PEETU). The PEETU is a short instructional unit involving a pre-test, instructional period, and posttest. The object of the PEETU instructional skill is to hit a tennis ball into a hoop in the least amount of strokes (hits). The modification of the PEETU consisted of simply lengthening the distance between the starting line and the hoop from thirty yards to forty-five yards. It was hypothesized that the reverse chaining method of teaching would not cause greater significant learning than the lecture/demonstration method, and that Academic Learning Time-Physical Education(M) (Motor ALT) would not be a better student process indicator for achievement independently of instructional method or length of the PEETU. The results indicated there were no significant differences between teaching methods or instructional periods within the PEETU. The results also indicated that Motor ALT is an important student process indicator when the student received between two and seven minutes of Motor ALT during the instructional period of the PEETU.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Keller, Joseph G."],"institution":"Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University","degree_name":"Master of Science","degree_level":"masters","degree_discipline":"Education","degree_department":"Education","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1982,"date_issued":"1982","date_published":"1982","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:20:12Z","subjects":[],"languages":["en_US"],"rights":["In Copyright"],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10919/87123","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Education"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Keller, Joseph G."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2019-01-31T17:50:29Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2019-01-31T17:50:29Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["1982"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.dcmitype","label":"Dc Type Dcmitype","values":["Text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Education"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en_US"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright"]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/87123"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This study was undertaken to research and modify the Georgia Project hockey/golf Physical Education Experimental Teaching Unit (PEETU). The PEETU is a short instructional unit involving a pre-test, instructional period, and posttest. The object of the PEETU instructional skill is to hit a tennis ball into a hoop in the least amount of strokes (hits). The modification of the PEETU consisted of simply lengthening the distance between the starting line and the hoop from thirty yards to forty-five yards. It was hypothesized that the reverse chaining method of teaching would not cause greater significant learning than the lecture/demonstration method, and that Academic Learning Time-Physical Education(M) (Motor ALT) would not be a better student process indicator for achievement independently of instructional method or length of the PEETU. The results indicated there were no significant differences between teaching methods or instructional periods within the PEETU. The results also indicated that Motor ALT is an important student process indicator when the student received between two and seven minutes of Motor ALT during the instructional period of the PEETU."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["Master of Science"]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Modification of a physical education experimental teaching unit"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.department":["Education"],"dc:creator":["Keller, Joseph G."],"dc:date.accessioned":["2019-01-31T17:50:29Z"],"dc:date.available":["2019-01-31T17:50:29Z"],"dc:date.issued":["1982"],"dc:description.abstract":["This study was undertaken to research and modify the Georgia Project hockey/golf Physical Education Experimental Teaching Unit (PEETU). The PEETU is a short instructional unit involving a pre-test, instructional period, and posttest. The object of the PEETU instructional skill is to hit a tennis ball into a hoop in the least amount of strokes (hits). The modification of the PEETU consisted of simply lengthening the distance between the starting line and the hoop from thirty yards to forty-five yards. It was hypothesized that the reverse chaining method of teaching would not cause greater significant learning than the lecture/demonstration method, and that Academic Learning Time-Physical Education(M) (Motor ALT) would not be a better student process indicator for achievement independently of instructional method or length of the PEETU. The results indicated there were no significant differences between teaching methods or instructional periods within the PEETU. The results also indicated that Motor ALT is an important student process indicator when the student received between two and seven minutes of Motor ALT during the instructional period of the PEETU."],"dc:description.degree":["Master of Science"],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/87123"],"dc:language.iso":["en_US"],"dc:publisher":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright"],"dc:rights.uri":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:title":["Modification of a physical education experimental teaching unit"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.dcmitype":["Text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Education"],"thesis:degree_level":["masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science"],"thesis:institution_name":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:20:12Z"}