{"id":{"repo_id":"vt","oai_identifier":"oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/83802"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/vt/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/83802","repository":{"repo_id":"vt","name":"Virginia Tech","base_url":"https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Preparing K-12 Educators to Teach Students with Disabilities","abstract":"My dissertation is comprised of two manuscripts on preparing educators to address the needs of students with disabilities. The first manuscript is a systematic review of 23 empirical studies published over the last two decades, addressing how traditional teacher preparation programs prepared preservice educators to learn about teaching students with disabilities in inclusive settings. A conceptual model was developed to synthesize the findings. Better outcomes in dispositions, knowledge, and skills were associated with preservice educators placements in inclusive classrooms where supportive supervising teachers modeled effective collaboration and provided opportunities for developing specific teaching skills. Although student disability type and teacher education program type are not directly related to preparation, researchers suggest that they mediate preservice educators' dispositions. The second manuscript examines the demographic, preparation, and school poverty level of a nationally representative sample of 51,340 early career special educators and the extent to which more and less preparation predicted their perceived preparedness for eight instructional practices. Data analyses included descriptive statistics, cross tabulations, and multiple linear regression. Findings indicated that more preparation significantly predicted educators' feelings of preparedness as they began teaching. The majority of educators with more preparation entered teaching through traditional routes while those who were less prepared tended to enter through alternative routes. Additionally, the majority of all educators felt least prepared to use student data to inform instruction and most prepared to differentiate instruction. Implications for education policy, teacher preparation, and future research are considered in both manuscripts.","abstract_html":"My dissertation is comprised of two manuscripts on preparing educators to address the needs of students with disabilities. The first manuscript is a systematic review of 23 empirical studies published over the last two decades, addressing how traditional teacher preparation programs prepared preservice educators to learn about teaching students with disabilities in inclusive settings. A conceptual model was developed to synthesize the findings. Better outcomes in dispositions, knowledge, and skills were associated with preservice educators placements in inclusive classrooms where supportive supervising teachers modeled effective collaboration and provided opportunities for developing specific teaching skills. Although student disability type and teacher education program type are not directly related to preparation, researchers suggest that they mediate preservice educators' dispositions. The second manuscript examines the demographic, preparation, and school poverty level of a nationally representative sample of 51,340 early career special educators and the extent to which more and less preparation predicted their perceived preparedness for eight instructional practices. Data analyses included descriptive statistics, cross tabulations, and multiple linear regression. Findings indicated that more preparation significantly predicted educators' feelings of preparedness as they began teaching. The majority of educators with more preparation entered teaching through traditional routes while those who were less prepared tended to enter through alternative routes. Additionally, the majority of all educators felt least prepared to use student data to inform instruction and most prepared to differentiate instruction. Implications for education policy, teacher preparation, and future research are considered in both manuscripts.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Banks, Amanda Brooks"],"institution":"Virginia Tech","degree_name":"Ph. D.","degree_level":"doctoral","degree_discipline":"Curriculum and Instruction","degree_department":"Education, Vocational-Technical","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":["Billingsley, Bonnie S."],"committee_members":["Williams, Thomas O.","Fogelsong, Donna Fortune","Barksdale, Mary Alice"],"year":2018,"date_issued":"2018-06-28","date_published":"2018-06-28","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:19:53Z","subjects":["preservice preparation","teacher education","special education teachers"],"languages":[],"rights":["In Copyright"],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["vt_gsexam:15635"],"render_values":[{"text":"vt_gsexam:15635","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10919/83802","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.committeechair","label":"Committee Chair","values":["Billingsley, Bonnie S."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Williams, Thomas O.","Fogelsong, Donna Fortune","Barksdale, Mary Alice"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Education, Vocational-Technical"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Banks, Amanda Brooks"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2018-06-29T08:00:54Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2018-06-29T08:00:54Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2018-06-28"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Virginia Tech"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Curriculum and Instruction"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["doctoral"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph. D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["preservice preparation","teacher education","special education teachers"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright"]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["vt_gsexam:15635"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/83802"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["My dissertation is comprised of two manuscripts on preparing educators to address the needs of students with disabilities. The first manuscript is a systematic review of 23 empirical studies published over the last two decades, addressing how traditional teacher preparation programs prepared preservice educators to learn about teaching students with disabilities in inclusive settings. A conceptual model was developed to synthesize the findings. Better outcomes in dispositions, knowledge, and skills were associated with preservice educators placements in inclusive classrooms where supportive supervising teachers modeled effective collaboration and provided opportunities for developing specific teaching skills. Although student disability type and teacher education program type are not directly related to preparation, researchers suggest that they mediate preservice educators' dispositions. The second manuscript examines the demographic, preparation, and school poverty level of a nationally representative sample of 51,340 early career special educators and the extent to which more and less preparation predicted their perceived preparedness for eight instructional practices. Data analyses included descriptive statistics, cross tabulations, and multiple linear regression. Findings indicated that more preparation significantly predicted educators' feelings of preparedness as they began teaching. The majority of educators with more preparation entered teaching through traditional routes while those who were less prepared tended to enter through alternative routes. Additionally, the majority of all educators felt least prepared to use student data to inform instruction and most prepared to differentiate instruction. Implications for education policy, teacher preparation, and future research are considered in both manuscripts."]},{"key":"dc:description.abstractgeneral","label":"General Abstract","values":["What matters most in preparing educators to teach students with disabilities has often been debated but has yet to be clearly determined. This dissertation is comprised of two manuscripts that explore this topic. The first manuscript examines how traditional teacher preparation programs prepare classroom teachers to teach students with disabilities in inclusive classrooms. A conceptual model is provided that reflects how key factors interact to shape preservice educators’ development of inclusion-related dispositions, knowledge, and skills. Findings indicate that experiences in inclusive classrooms with supportive supervising teachers who are skilled collaborators result in positive outcomes for preservice educators. The second manuscript explores the demographic characteristics, teacher preparation, and school poverty level of new special educators across the United States, and whether their preservice preparation had a significant affect on their feelings of readiness to teach during their first year. Findings indicate that more preparation helps new special educators feel better prepared. Most of these better-prepared educators entered the profession through traditional teacher education programs while those with less preparation tended to enter through alternative routes. Implications for improving how new educators are prepared to teach students with disabilities are considered in both manuscripts."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["Ph. D."]},{"key":"dc:format.medium","label":"Dc Format Medium","values":["ETD"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Preparing K-12 Educators to Teach Students with Disabilities"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.committeechair":["Billingsley, Bonnie S."],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Williams, Thomas O.","Fogelsong, Donna Fortune","Barksdale, Mary Alice"],"dc:contributor.department":["Education, Vocational-Technical"],"dc:creator":["Banks, Amanda Brooks"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2018-06-29T08:00:54Z"],"dc:date.available":["2018-06-29T08:00:54Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2018-06-28"],"dc:description.abstract":["My dissertation is comprised of two manuscripts on preparing educators to address the needs of students with disabilities. The first manuscript is a systematic review of 23 empirical studies published over the last two decades, addressing how traditional teacher preparation programs prepared preservice educators to learn about teaching students with disabilities in inclusive settings. A conceptual model was developed to synthesize the findings. Better outcomes in dispositions, knowledge, and skills were associated with preservice educators placements in inclusive classrooms where supportive supervising teachers modeled effective collaboration and provided opportunities for developing specific teaching skills. Although student disability type and teacher education program type are not directly related to preparation, researchers suggest that they mediate preservice educators' dispositions. The second manuscript examines the demographic, preparation, and school poverty level of a nationally representative sample of 51,340 early career special educators and the extent to which more and less preparation predicted their perceived preparedness for eight instructional practices. Data analyses included descriptive statistics, cross tabulations, and multiple linear regression. Findings indicated that more preparation significantly predicted educators' feelings of preparedness as they began teaching. The majority of educators with more preparation entered teaching through traditional routes while those who were less prepared tended to enter through alternative routes. Additionally, the majority of all educators felt least prepared to use student data to inform instruction and most prepared to differentiate instruction. Implications for education policy, teacher preparation, and future research are considered in both manuscripts."],"dc:description.abstractgeneral":["What matters most in preparing educators to teach students with disabilities has often been debated but has yet to be clearly determined. This dissertation is comprised of two manuscripts that explore this topic. The first manuscript examines how traditional teacher preparation programs prepare classroom teachers to teach students with disabilities in inclusive classrooms. A conceptual model is provided that reflects how key factors interact to shape preservice educators’ development of inclusion-related dispositions, knowledge, and skills. Findings indicate that experiences in inclusive classrooms with supportive supervising teachers who are skilled collaborators result in positive outcomes for preservice educators. The second manuscript explores the demographic characteristics, teacher preparation, and school poverty level of new special educators across the United States, and whether their preservice preparation had a significant affect on their feelings of readiness to teach during their first year. Findings indicate that more preparation helps new special educators feel better prepared. Most of these better-prepared educators entered the profession through traditional teacher education programs while those with less preparation tended to enter through alternative routes. Implications for improving how new educators are prepared to teach students with disabilities are considered in both manuscripts."],"dc:description.degree":["Ph. D."],"dc:format.medium":["ETD"],"dc:identifier.other":["vt_gsexam:15635"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/83802"],"dc:publisher":["Virginia Tech"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright"],"dc:rights.uri":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:subject":["preservice preparation","teacher education","special education teachers"],"dc:title":["Preparing K-12 Educators to Teach Students with Disabilities"],"dc:type":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Curriculum and Instruction"],"thesis:degree_level":["doctoral"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph. D."],"thesis:institution_name":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:19:53Z"}