{"id":{"repo_id":"vt","oai_identifier":"oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/64606"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/vt/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/64606","repository":{"repo_id":"vt","name":"Virginia Tech","base_url":"https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Mechanisms for intergovernmental cooperation in the Southeastern Virginia Planning District: an evaluation","abstract":"New mechanisms proposed for achieving intergovernmental cooperation, primarily among the four major cities. of the Southeastern Virginia Planning District, were evaluated relative to existing legislative provisions for the planning district to become a multi-purpose service district. Those new mechanisms included: an urban services corporation; a regional urban bank; a regional incentive fund; and an area-wide commission to oversee the other mechanisms. They were not acceptable to the state administration as presented in a consultants' report. In the evaluation, the mechanisms were found to be more appropriate to the needs of the region than the service district or proposed modifications to that concept. Recommendations were made aimed at achieving compromise mechanisms acceptable to the state and the region.","abstract_html":"New mechanisms proposed for achieving intergovernmental cooperation, primarily among the four major cities. of the Southeastern Virginia Planning District, were evaluated relative to existing legislative provisions for the planning district to become a multi-purpose service district. Those new mechanisms included: an urban services corporation; a regional urban bank; a regional incentive fund; and an area-wide commission to oversee the other mechanisms. They were not acceptable to the state administration as presented in a consultants' report. In the evaluation, the mechanisms were found to be more appropriate to the needs of the region than the service district or proposed modifications to that concept. Recommendations were made aimed at achieving compromise mechanisms acceptable to the state and the region.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Christoffel, Thomas Joseph"],"institution":"Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University","degree_name":"Master of Urban Affairs","degree_level":"masters","degree_discipline":"Urban Affairs","degree_department":"Urban Affairs","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1973,"date_issued":"1973","date_published":"1973","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:19:42Z","subjects":[],"languages":["en"],"rights":["In Copyright"],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10919/64606","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Urban Affairs"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Christoffel, Thomas Joseph"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2016-02-01T14:45:02Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2016-02-01T14:45:02Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["1973"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.dcmitype","label":"Dc Type Dcmitype","values":["Text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Urban Affairs"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Urban Affairs"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright"]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/64606"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["New mechanisms proposed for achieving intergovernmental cooperation, primarily among the four major cities. of the Southeastern Virginia Planning District, were evaluated relative to existing legislative provisions for the planning district to become a multi-purpose service district. Those new mechanisms included: an urban services corporation; a regional urban bank; a regional incentive fund; and an area-wide commission to oversee the other mechanisms. They were not acceptable to the state administration as presented in a consultants' report. In the evaluation, the mechanisms were found to be more appropriate to the needs of the region than the service district or proposed modifications to that concept. Recommendations were made aimed at achieving compromise mechanisms acceptable to the state and the region."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["Master of Urban Affairs"]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Mechanisms for intergovernmental cooperation in the Southeastern Virginia Planning District: an evaluation"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.department":["Urban Affairs"],"dc:creator":["Christoffel, Thomas Joseph"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2016-02-01T14:45:02Z"],"dc:date.available":["2016-02-01T14:45:02Z"],"dc:date.issued":["1973"],"dc:description.abstract":["New mechanisms proposed for achieving intergovernmental cooperation, primarily among the four major cities. of the Southeastern Virginia Planning District, were evaluated relative to existing legislative provisions for the planning district to become a multi-purpose service district. Those new mechanisms included: an urban services corporation; a regional urban bank; a regional incentive fund; and an area-wide commission to oversee the other mechanisms. They were not acceptable to the state administration as presented in a consultants' report. In the evaluation, the mechanisms were found to be more appropriate to the needs of the region than the service district or proposed modifications to that concept. Recommendations were made aimed at achieving compromise mechanisms acceptable to the state and the region."],"dc:description.degree":["Master of Urban Affairs"],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/64606"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:publisher":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright"],"dc:rights.uri":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:title":["Mechanisms for intergovernmental cooperation in the Southeastern Virginia Planning District: an evaluation"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.dcmitype":["Text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Urban Affairs"],"thesis:degree_level":["masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Urban Affairs"],"thesis:institution_name":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:19:42Z"}