{"id":{"repo_id":"vt","oai_identifier":"oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/54839"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/vt/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/54839","repository":{"repo_id":"vt","name":"Virginia Tech","base_url":"https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Freedom, conflict and social organization: an illustrative analysis","abstract":"This thesis proceeds from the observation of Professor George A. Hillery, Jr. that groups which are oriented towards achieving specific goals (formal organizations) show greater perceived deprivation of freedom and conflict among their members than do groups which are not so oriented (communal organizations). A variable, the goal relationship, is suggested as possibly ordering groups according to perceived deprivation of freedom and conflict within the categories of formal and communal organizations as well as between them. The goal relationship is defined as the perceptions of organizational members of the extent to which the official goals of an organization support their own personal goals. In hypothetical form, the contention of this thesis is that the perceived deprivation of freedom and intra-organizational conflict of an organization's members will increase the more the members perceive the official organizational goals as being nonsupportive of their personal goals. An illustrative analysis of this contention is undertaken at the group level for the lower participants of seven organizations. The results indicate strong support for the hypothesis, though cautious interpretation of the results is suggested because the seven organizations studied do not represent a known population.","abstract_html":"This thesis proceeds from the observation of Professor George A. Hillery, Jr. that groups which are oriented towards achieving specific goals (formal organizations) show greater perceived deprivation of freedom and conflict among their members than do groups which are not so oriented (communal organizations). A variable, the goal relationship, is suggested as possibly ordering groups according to perceived deprivation of freedom and conflict within the categories of formal and communal organizations as well as between them. The goal relationship is defined as the perceptions of organizational members of the extent to which the official goals of an organization support their own personal goals. In hypothetical form, the contention of this thesis is that the perceived deprivation of freedom and intra-organizational conflict of an organization's members will increase the more the members perceive the official organizational goals as being nonsupportive of their personal goals. An illustrative analysis of this contention is undertaken at the group level for the lower participants of seven organizations. The results indicate strong support for the hypothesis, though cautious interpretation of the results is suggested because the seven organizations studied do not represent a known population.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Carlson, John Richmond"],"institution":"Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University","degree_name":"Master of Science","degree_level":"masters","degree_discipline":"Sociology","degree_department":"Sociology","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1974,"date_issued":"1974","date_published":"1974","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:19:51Z","subjects":[],"languages":["en"],"rights":["In Copyright"],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10919/54839","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Sociology"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Carlson, John Richmond"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2015-07-28T20:42:13Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2015-07-28T20:42:13Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["1974"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.dcmitype","label":"Dc Type Dcmitype","values":["Text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Sociology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright"]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/54839"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This thesis proceeds from the observation of Professor George A. Hillery, Jr. that groups which are oriented towards achieving specific goals (formal organizations) show greater perceived deprivation of freedom and conflict among their members than do groups which are not so oriented (communal organizations). A variable, the goal relationship, is suggested as possibly ordering groups according to perceived deprivation of freedom and conflict within the categories of formal and communal organizations as well as between them. The goal relationship is defined as the perceptions of organizational members of the extent to which the official goals of an organization support their own personal goals. In hypothetical form, the contention of this thesis is that the perceived deprivation of freedom and intra-organizational conflict of an organization's members will increase the more the members perceive the official organizational goals as being nonsupportive of their personal goals. An illustrative analysis of this contention is undertaken at the group level for the lower participants of seven organizations. The results indicate strong support for the hypothesis, though cautious interpretation of the results is suggested because the seven organizations studied do not represent a known population."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["Master of Science"]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Freedom, conflict and social organization: an illustrative analysis"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.department":["Sociology"],"dc:creator":["Carlson, John Richmond"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2015-07-28T20:42:13Z"],"dc:date.available":["2015-07-28T20:42:13Z"],"dc:date.issued":["1974"],"dc:description.abstract":["This thesis proceeds from the observation of Professor George A. Hillery, Jr. that groups which are oriented towards achieving specific goals (formal organizations) show greater perceived deprivation of freedom and conflict among their members than do groups which are not so oriented (communal organizations). A variable, the goal relationship, is suggested as possibly ordering groups according to perceived deprivation of freedom and conflict within the categories of formal and communal organizations as well as between them. The goal relationship is defined as the perceptions of organizational members of the extent to which the official goals of an organization support their own personal goals. In hypothetical form, the contention of this thesis is that the perceived deprivation of freedom and intra-organizational conflict of an organization's members will increase the more the members perceive the official organizational goals as being nonsupportive of their personal goals. An illustrative analysis of this contention is undertaken at the group level for the lower participants of seven organizations. The results indicate strong support for the hypothesis, though cautious interpretation of the results is suggested because the seven organizations studied do not represent a known population."],"dc:description.degree":["Master of Science"],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/54839"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:publisher":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright"],"dc:rights.uri":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:title":["Freedom, conflict and social organization: an illustrative analysis"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.dcmitype":["Text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Sociology"],"thesis:degree_level":["masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science"],"thesis:institution_name":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:19:51Z"}