Back to results

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

The effects of gender, socioeconomic status, and situation specificity on thinking, feeling, and acting

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

In the field of counseling the thinking-feeling-acting (T-F-A) trichotomy provides several advantages over conventional approaches to select counseling methods. Hutchins developed the TFA system and a corresponding instrument, the Hutchins Behavior Inventory (HBI), to assess a client’s thinking-feeling-acting orientation. Factors influencing the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains of human functioning have been identified, but past research often led to conflicting or unsatisfying results. Some researchers claim that there are significant cognitive, affective, and psychomotor gender differences, whereas others describe the effects of gender as nonexistent. The influences of socioeconomic status on an individual’s level of thinking, feeling, and acting have rarely been studied, and, by and large, the question of whether or not human functioning is situation specific has been theoretically addressed rather than empirically researched. In this study path analysis and the LISREL methodology were used to investigate to what extent thinking-feeling-acting orientations are dependent on gender, socioeconomic status, and the situational context. The Hutchins Behavior Inventory was used to assess the TFA orientations of 172 resident counselors at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. The effects of gender and socioeconomic status on thinking, feeling, and acting were minimal, whereas relatively strong influences of situational context on thinking and acting were found. These results provided some evidence that the TFA system does not discriminate on the basis of sociodemographic factors but that counseling professionals should give careful consideration to the specific situation under which behavior is assessed. In addition, arguments were presented showing that HBI scores are not all of an ipsative nature and thus are suitable for statistical analyses. Further evidence was provided that the HBI is a reliable instrument consistently measuring thinking-feeling-acting orientations.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Ph. D.
Level thesis:degree_level
doctoral
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Educational Research and Evaluation
Department dc:contributor.department
Educational Research and Evaluation
Grantor dc:publisher
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Year dc:date.issued
1987

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Mueller, Ralph Otto
Chair dc:contributor.committeechair
  • Wolfle, Lee M.
Committee members dc:contributor.committeemember
  • Cross, Lawrence H.
  • Hutchins, David E.
  • McLaughlin, Gerald W.
  • Vogler, Daniel E.

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • In Copyright

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Handle dc:identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/10919/49863
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/49863

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Virginia Tech
Base URL
vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
related terms
citation

Mueller, Ralph Otto. The effects of gender, socioeconomic status, and situation specificity on thinking, feeling, and acting. doctoral thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1987. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/49863