{"id":{"repo_id":"vt","oai_identifier":"oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/46110"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/vt/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/46110","repository":{"repo_id":"vt","name":"Virginia Tech","base_url":"https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Evaluation of accuracy and reliability of structural analysis and steel design software","abstract":"The accuracy and reliability of three structural analysis and design programs were evaluated. The three programs considered were MicasPlus, STAAD III, and GTSTRUDL. Nine different test cases of three basic steel space frames were analyzed and designed using the programs. The nine cases were formed by modifying different modeling, analysis, and design parameters. Comparison of results obtained from the programs for each case was presented. It was found that the percentage differences in the analysis results obtained from the programs were typically less than five percent. For steel design, both MicasPlus and GTSTRUDL gave member sizes that were very close. It was also found that changing modeling parameters can have a significant effect on analysis results. This confirms the importance of accurate structural modeling. The functionality and usability of the three programs were also evaluated. After an extensive study of MicasPlus a list of suggested modifications and additions to the program was presented.","abstract_html":"The accuracy and reliability of three structural analysis and design programs were evaluated. The three programs considered were MicasPlus, STAAD III, and GTSTRUDL. Nine different test cases of three basic steel space frames were analyzed and designed using the programs. The nine cases were formed by modifying different modeling, analysis, and design parameters. Comparison of results obtained from the programs for each case was presented. It was found that the percentage differences in the analysis results obtained from the programs were typically less than five percent. For steel design, both MicasPlus and GTSTRUDL gave member sizes that were very close. It was also found that changing modeling parameters can have a significant effect on analysis results. This confirms the importance of accurate structural modeling. The functionality and usability of the three programs were also evaluated. After an extensive study of MicasPlus a list of suggested modifications and additions to the program was presented.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Divecha, Dharmesh R."],"institution":"Virginia Tech","degree_name":"Master of Science","degree_level":"masters","degree_discipline":"Civil Engineering","degree_department":"Civil Engineering","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":["Rojiani, Kamal B."],"committee_members":["Easterling, William Samuel","Holzer, Siegfried M."],"year":1994,"date_issued":"1994-12-15","date_published":"1994-12-15","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:19:19Z","subjects":[],"languages":["en"],"rights":["In Copyright"],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-12042009-020259"],"render_values":[{"text":"etd-12042009-020259","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10919/46110","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.committeechair","label":"Committee Chair","values":["Rojiani, Kamal B."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Easterling, William Samuel","Holzer, Siegfried M."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Civil Engineering"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Divecha, Dharmesh R."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2014-03-14T21:50:59Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2014-03-14T21:50:59Z","2009-12-04"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["1994-12-15"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Virginia Tech"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.dcmitype","label":"Dc Type Dcmitype","values":["Text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Civil Engineering"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright"]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-12042009-020259"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/46110"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The accuracy and reliability of three structural analysis and design programs were evaluated. The three programs considered were MicasPlus, STAAD III, and GTSTRUDL. Nine different test cases of three basic steel space frames were analyzed and designed using the programs. The nine cases were formed by modifying different modeling, analysis, and design parameters. Comparison of results obtained from the programs for each case was presented. It was found that the percentage differences in the analysis results obtained from the programs were typically less than five percent. For steel design, both MicasPlus and GTSTRUDL gave member sizes that were very close. It was also found that changing modeling parameters can have a significant effect on analysis results. This confirms the importance of accurate structural modeling. The functionality and usability of the three programs were also evaluated. After an extensive study of MicasPlus a list of suggested modifications and additions to the program was presented."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["Master of Science"]},{"key":"dc:format.medium","label":"Dc Format Medium","values":["BTD"]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Evaluation of accuracy and reliability of structural analysis and steel design software"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.committeechair":["Rojiani, Kamal B."],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Easterling, William Samuel","Holzer, Siegfried M."],"dc:contributor.department":["Civil Engineering"],"dc:creator":["Divecha, Dharmesh R."],"dc:date.accessioned":["2014-03-14T21:50:59Z"],"dc:date.available":["2014-03-14T21:50:59Z","2009-12-04"],"dc:date.issued":["1994-12-15"],"dc:description.abstract":["The accuracy and reliability of three structural analysis and design programs were evaluated. The three programs considered were MicasPlus, STAAD III, and GTSTRUDL. Nine different test cases of three basic steel space frames were analyzed and designed using the programs. The nine cases were formed by modifying different modeling, analysis, and design parameters. Comparison of results obtained from the programs for each case was presented. It was found that the percentage differences in the analysis results obtained from the programs were typically less than five percent. For steel design, both MicasPlus and GTSTRUDL gave member sizes that were very close. It was also found that changing modeling parameters can have a significant effect on analysis results. This confirms the importance of accurate structural modeling. The functionality and usability of the three programs were also evaluated. After an extensive study of MicasPlus a list of suggested modifications and additions to the program was presented."],"dc:description.degree":["Master of Science"],"dc:format.medium":["BTD"],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.other":["etd-12042009-020259"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/46110"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:publisher":["Virginia Tech"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright"],"dc:rights.uri":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:title":["Evaluation of accuracy and reliability of structural analysis and steel design software"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.dcmitype":["Text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Civil Engineering"],"thesis:degree_level":["masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science"],"thesis:institution_name":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:19:19Z"}