{"id":{"repo_id":"vt","oai_identifier":"oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/46031"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/vt/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/46031","repository":{"repo_id":"vt","name":"Virginia Tech","base_url":"https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Relationships among progesterone, estradiol-17β, 13, 14-dihydro-15-keto-prostaglandin F₂α and prostaglandin F₂α in intact ewes around the time of luteolysis","abstract":"The exact mechanisms controlling uterine secretion of prostaglandin F₂α (PGF₂α) are not known. This study (Experiments 1, 2 and 3) was conducted to evaluate the relationships of progesterone and estrogen to changes in 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-prostaglandin F₂α (PGFM) and PGF₂α in ewes. Experiment 1 was designed to determine whether a radioimmunoassay (RIA) for progesterone would detect pessary-released 6α-methyl-17α-hydroxy-progesterone (MPA; n=3) and oral 17α-acetoxy-6-methyl-16-methylene-4, 6-pregnadiene-3, 20 dione (MGA; n=3) in blood plasma of ovariectomized ewes. Neither progestogen treatment interfered with the RIA. Experiment 2 was conducted to answer the question: Do MPA-containing pessaries delay luteolysis in intact ewes? Ewes were treated with MPA containing (n=10) or blank pessaries (controls; n=8) from d 7 and until d 18 of the estrous cycle for control and until d 22 for MPA-treated ewes; d 0 was the day of estrus. Blood samples were collected from the jugular vein throughout the experiment. Pessaries containing MPA did not affect the timing of luteolysis (d 15.4 ± .2), but they prolonged (P<.O5) the interestrous interval (17.5 d for control vs 24.1 d for MPA-treated ewes). Experiment 3 was designed to study the relationships among progesterone, estrogen, PGFM and PGF₂α in ewes. Ewes were treated with MPA-containing (n=7; 60 mg), progesterone-containing (n=8i 45 mg) or blank pessaries (n=8) from d 7 until d 20 of the estrous cycle. From d 14 and continuing until 24 h after estrus, jugular and vena caval blood samples were collected during two sampling periods daily. Plasma was assayed for progesterone, estrogen, PGFM and PGF₂α. Treatment did not affect the profiles of change in concentration of progesterone, PGFM and jugular PGF₂α, but treatment affected (P < .05) estrogen and vena caval PGF₂α profiles. Overall, treatment affected (P < .05) the mean concentrations of estrogen, progesterone, PGFM and PGF₂α. sampling site (jugular vs. vena cava) affected (P < .0001) the mean concentration of progesterone, estrogen and PGF₂α, but site did not affect PGFM concentrations. Hormonal relationships associated with changes in release of PGF₂α were evaluated. Estrogen seemed to be the primary hormone controlling PGF₂α release. In conclusion, MPA treatment did not delay the timing of luteolysis, but it increased the interestrous interval. Of the compounds measured, estrogen accounted for the greatest proportion of the variation in PGF₂α release in ewes around the time of luteolysis.","abstract_html":"The exact mechanisms controlling uterine secretion of prostaglandin F₂α (PGF₂α) are not known. This study (Experiments 1, 2 and 3) was conducted to evaluate the relationships of progesterone and estrogen to changes in 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-prostaglandin F₂α (PGFM) and PGF₂α in ewes. Experiment 1 was designed to determine whether a radioimmunoassay (RIA) for progesterone would detect pessary-released 6α-methyl-17α-hydroxy-progesterone (MPA; n=3) and oral 17α-acetoxy-6-methyl-16-methylene-4, 6-pregnadiene-3, 20 dione (MGA; n=3) in blood plasma of ovariectomized ewes. Neither progestogen treatment interfered with the RIA. Experiment 2 was conducted to answer the question: Do MPA-containing pessaries delay luteolysis in intact ewes? Ewes were treated with MPA containing (n=10) or blank pessaries (controls; n=8) from d 7 and until d 18 of the estrous cycle for control and until d 22 for MPA-treated ewes; d 0 was the day of estrus. Blood samples were collected from the jugular vein throughout the experiment. Pessaries containing MPA did not affect the timing of luteolysis (d 15.4 ± .2), but they prolonged (P&lt;.O5) the interestrous interval (17.5 d for control vs 24.1 d for MPA-treated ewes). Experiment 3 was designed to study the relationships among progesterone, estrogen, PGFM and PGF₂α in ewes. Ewes were treated with MPA-containing (n=7; 60 mg), progesterone-containing (n=8i 45 mg) or blank pessaries (n=8) from d 7 until d 20 of the estrous cycle. From d 14 and continuing until 24 h after estrus, jugular and vena caval blood samples were collected during two sampling periods daily. Plasma was assayed for progesterone, estrogen, PGFM and PGF₂α. Treatment did not affect the profiles of change in concentration of progesterone, PGFM and jugular PGF₂α, but treatment affected (P &lt; .05) estrogen and vena caval PGF₂α profiles. Overall, treatment affected (P &lt; .05) the mean concentrations of estrogen, progesterone, PGFM and PGF₂α. sampling site (jugular vs. vena cava) affected (P &lt; .0001) the mean concentration of progesterone, estrogen and PGF₂α, but site did not affect PGFM concentrations. Hormonal relationships associated with changes in release of PGF₂α were evaluated. Estrogen seemed to be the primary hormone controlling PGF₂α release. In conclusion, MPA treatment did not delay the timing of luteolysis, but it increased the interestrous interval. Of the compounds measured, estrogen accounted for the greatest proportion of the variation in PGF₂α release in ewes around the time of luteolysis.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Fortin, Suyapa"],"institution":"Virginia Tech","degree_name":"Master of Science","degree_level":"masters","degree_discipline":"Animal Science","degree_department":"Animal Science","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":["Lewis, Gregory S."],"committee_members":["Hohenboken, William D.","Knight, James W."],"year":1991,"date_issued":"1991-09-09","date_published":"1991-09-09","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:18:58Z","subjects":[],"languages":["en"],"rights":["In Copyright"],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-11252009-020010"],"render_values":[{"text":"etd-11252009-020010","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10919/46031","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.committeechair","label":"Committee Chair","values":["Lewis, Gregory S."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Hohenboken, William D.","Knight, James W."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Animal Science"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Fortin, Suyapa"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2014-03-14T21:50:45Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2014-03-14T21:50:45Z","2009-11-25"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["1991-09-09"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Virginia Tech"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.dcmitype","label":"Dc Type Dcmitype","values":["Text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Animal Science"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright"]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-11252009-020010"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/46031"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The exact mechanisms controlling uterine secretion of prostaglandin F₂α (PGF₂α) are not known. This study (Experiments 1, 2 and 3) was conducted to evaluate the relationships of progesterone and estrogen to changes in 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-prostaglandin F₂α (PGFM) and PGF₂α in ewes. Experiment 1 was designed to determine whether a radioimmunoassay (RIA) for progesterone would detect pessary-released 6α-methyl-17α-hydroxy-progesterone (MPA; n=3) and oral 17α-acetoxy-6-methyl-16-methylene-4, 6-pregnadiene-3, 20 dione (MGA; n=3) in blood plasma of ovariectomized ewes. Neither progestogen treatment interfered with the RIA. Experiment 2 was conducted to answer the question: Do MPA-containing pessaries delay luteolysis in intact ewes? Ewes were treated with MPA containing (n=10) or blank pessaries (controls; n=8) from d 7 and until d 18 of the estrous cycle for control and until d 22 for MPA-treated ewes; d 0 was the day of estrus. Blood samples were collected from the jugular vein throughout the experiment. Pessaries containing MPA did not affect the timing of luteolysis (d 15.4 ± .2), but they prolonged (P<.O5) the interestrous interval (17.5 d for control vs 24.1 d for MPA-treated ewes). Experiment 3 was designed to study the relationships among progesterone, estrogen, PGFM and PGF₂α in ewes. Ewes were treated with MPA-containing (n=7; 60 mg), progesterone-containing (n=8i 45 mg) or blank pessaries (n=8) from d 7 until d 20 of the estrous cycle. From d 14 and continuing until 24 h after estrus, jugular and vena caval blood samples were collected during two sampling periods daily. Plasma was assayed for progesterone, estrogen, PGFM and PGF₂α. Treatment did not affect the profiles of change in concentration of progesterone, PGFM and jugular PGF₂α, but treatment affected (P < .05) estrogen and vena caval PGF₂α profiles. Overall, treatment affected (P < .05) the mean concentrations of estrogen, progesterone, PGFM and PGF₂α. sampling site (jugular vs. vena cava) affected (P < .0001) the mean concentration of progesterone, estrogen and PGF₂α, but site did not affect PGFM concentrations. Hormonal relationships associated with changes in release of PGF₂α were evaluated. Estrogen seemed to be the primary hormone controlling PGF₂α release. In conclusion, MPA treatment did not delay the timing of luteolysis, but it increased the interestrous interval. Of the compounds measured, estrogen accounted for the greatest proportion of the variation in PGF₂α release in ewes around the time of luteolysis."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["Master of Science"]},{"key":"dc:format.medium","label":"Dc Format Medium","values":["BTD"]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Relationships among progesterone, estradiol-17β, 13, 14-dihydro-15-keto-prostaglandin F₂α and prostaglandin F₂α in intact ewes around the time of luteolysis"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.committeechair":["Lewis, Gregory S."],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Hohenboken, William D.","Knight, James W."],"dc:contributor.department":["Animal Science"],"dc:creator":["Fortin, Suyapa"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2014-03-14T21:50:45Z"],"dc:date.available":["2014-03-14T21:50:45Z","2009-11-25"],"dc:date.issued":["1991-09-09"],"dc:description.abstract":["The exact mechanisms controlling uterine secretion of prostaglandin F₂α (PGF₂α) are not known. This study (Experiments 1, 2 and 3) was conducted to evaluate the relationships of progesterone and estrogen to changes in 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-prostaglandin F₂α (PGFM) and PGF₂α in ewes. Experiment 1 was designed to determine whether a radioimmunoassay (RIA) for progesterone would detect pessary-released 6α-methyl-17α-hydroxy-progesterone (MPA; n=3) and oral 17α-acetoxy-6-methyl-16-methylene-4, 6-pregnadiene-3, 20 dione (MGA; n=3) in blood plasma of ovariectomized ewes. Neither progestogen treatment interfered with the RIA. Experiment 2 was conducted to answer the question: Do MPA-containing pessaries delay luteolysis in intact ewes? Ewes were treated with MPA containing (n=10) or blank pessaries (controls; n=8) from d 7 and until d 18 of the estrous cycle for control and until d 22 for MPA-treated ewes; d 0 was the day of estrus. Blood samples were collected from the jugular vein throughout the experiment. Pessaries containing MPA did not affect the timing of luteolysis (d 15.4 ± .2), but they prolonged (P<.O5) the interestrous interval (17.5 d for control vs 24.1 d for MPA-treated ewes). Experiment 3 was designed to study the relationships among progesterone, estrogen, PGFM and PGF₂α in ewes. Ewes were treated with MPA-containing (n=7; 60 mg), progesterone-containing (n=8i 45 mg) or blank pessaries (n=8) from d 7 until d 20 of the estrous cycle. From d 14 and continuing until 24 h after estrus, jugular and vena caval blood samples were collected during two sampling periods daily. Plasma was assayed for progesterone, estrogen, PGFM and PGF₂α. Treatment did not affect the profiles of change in concentration of progesterone, PGFM and jugular PGF₂α, but treatment affected (P < .05) estrogen and vena caval PGF₂α profiles. Overall, treatment affected (P < .05) the mean concentrations of estrogen, progesterone, PGFM and PGF₂α. sampling site (jugular vs. vena cava) affected (P < .0001) the mean concentration of progesterone, estrogen and PGF₂α, but site did not affect PGFM concentrations. Hormonal relationships associated with changes in release of PGF₂α were evaluated. Estrogen seemed to be the primary hormone controlling PGF₂α release. In conclusion, MPA treatment did not delay the timing of luteolysis, but it increased the interestrous interval. Of the compounds measured, estrogen accounted for the greatest proportion of the variation in PGF₂α release in ewes around the time of luteolysis."],"dc:description.degree":["Master of Science"],"dc:format.medium":["BTD"],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.other":["etd-11252009-020010"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/46031"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:publisher":["Virginia Tech"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright"],"dc:rights.uri":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:title":["Relationships among progesterone, estradiol-17β, 13, 14-dihydro-15-keto-prostaglandin F₂α and prostaglandin F₂α in intact ewes around the time of luteolysis"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.dcmitype":["Text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Animal Science"],"thesis:degree_level":["masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science"],"thesis:institution_name":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:18:58Z"}