{"id":{"repo_id":"vt","oai_identifier":"oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/44280"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/vt/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/44280","repository":{"repo_id":"vt","name":"Virginia Tech","base_url":"https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"A comparison of uncertainty analysis methods for the modeling of land disposal of petroleum exploration and production waste","abstract":"Three uncertainty analysis methods, namely : (1) Monte Carlo (MC) simulation, (2) First-Order Second Moment (FOSM) method, and (3) Modified Point Estimate (MPE) method, were compared in terms of computational efficiency and accuracy for evaluation of contaminant concentration at a down-gradient receptor. Benzene and chloride, two contaminants most commonly found in petroleum exploration and production waste, were analyzed for two waste disposal scenarios, i.e. (1) closed waste pit, and (2) landspreading. Using MC method as the basis for comparison, results of the analysis suggested the use of FOSM method as the most attractive alternative to the more tedious MC method. Based on 2000 MC simulations for analysis, the FOSM method required 1.053% of the computational effort required for the MC analysis. Considering a regulatory guideline of 85% probability level of exceedance, results of the analysis indicated that the MPE method consistently underestimated the benzene concentration and overestimated the chloride concentration at a receptor, whereas the FOSM analyses indicate good agreement with MC method. However, in the event where a more precise and complete analysis is mandatory, the MC method remains the most appropriate methodology available.","abstract_html":"Three uncertainty analysis methods, namely : (1) Monte Carlo (MC) simulation, (2) First-Order Second Moment (FOSM) method, and (3) Modified Point Estimate (MPE) method, were compared in terms of computational efficiency and accuracy for evaluation of contaminant concentration at a down-gradient receptor. Benzene and chloride, two contaminants most commonly found in petroleum exploration and production waste, were analyzed for two waste disposal scenarios, i.e. (1) closed waste pit, and (2) landspreading. Using MC method as the basis for comparison, results of the analysis suggested the use of FOSM method as the most attractive alternative to the more tedious MC method. Based on 2000 MC simulations for analysis, the FOSM method required 1.053% of the computational effort required for the MC analysis. Considering a regulatory guideline of 85% probability level of exceedance, results of the analysis indicated that the MPE method consistently underestimated the benzene concentration and overestimated the chloride concentration at a receptor, whereas the FOSM analyses indicate good agreement with MC method. However, in the event where a more precise and complete analysis is mandatory, the MC method remains the most appropriate methodology available.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Choong, Peng Kee"],"institution":"Virginia Tech","degree_name":"Master of Science","degree_level":"masters","degree_discipline":"Environmental Planning","degree_department":"Environmental Engineering","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":["Parker, Jack C."],"committee_members":["Gallagher, Daniel L.","Novak, John T."],"year":1991,"date_issued":"1991-05-05","date_published":"1991-05-05","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:19:13Z","subjects":[],"languages":["en"],"rights":["In Copyright"],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-08182009-040359"],"render_values":[{"text":"etd-08182009-040359","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10919/44280","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.committeechair","label":"Committee Chair","values":["Parker, Jack C."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Gallagher, Daniel L.","Novak, John T."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Environmental Engineering"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Choong, Peng Kee"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2014-03-14T21:42:57Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2014-03-14T21:42:57Z","2009-08-18"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["1991-05-05"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Virginia Tech"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.dcmitype","label":"Dc Type Dcmitype","values":["Text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Environmental Planning"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright"]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-08182009-040359"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/44280"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Three uncertainty analysis methods, namely : (1) Monte Carlo (MC) simulation, (2) First-Order Second Moment (FOSM) method, and (3) Modified Point Estimate (MPE) method, were compared in terms of computational efficiency and accuracy for evaluation of contaminant concentration at a down-gradient receptor. Benzene and chloride, two contaminants most commonly found in petroleum exploration and production waste, were analyzed for two waste disposal scenarios, i.e. (1) closed waste pit, and (2) landspreading. Using MC method as the basis for comparison, results of the analysis suggested the use of FOSM method as the most attractive alternative to the more tedious MC method. Based on 2000 MC simulations for analysis, the FOSM method required 1.053% of the computational effort required for the MC analysis. Considering a regulatory guideline of 85% probability level of exceedance, results of the analysis indicated that the MPE method consistently underestimated the benzene concentration and overestimated the chloride concentration at a receptor, whereas the FOSM analyses indicate good agreement with MC method. However, in the event where a more precise and complete analysis is mandatory, the MC method remains the most appropriate methodology available."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["Master of Science"]},{"key":"dc:format.medium","label":"Dc Format Medium","values":["BTD"]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["A comparison of uncertainty analysis methods for the modeling of land disposal of petroleum exploration and production waste"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.committeechair":["Parker, Jack C."],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Gallagher, Daniel L.","Novak, John T."],"dc:contributor.department":["Environmental Engineering"],"dc:creator":["Choong, Peng Kee"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2014-03-14T21:42:57Z"],"dc:date.available":["2014-03-14T21:42:57Z","2009-08-18"],"dc:date.issued":["1991-05-05"],"dc:description.abstract":["Three uncertainty analysis methods, namely : (1) Monte Carlo (MC) simulation, (2) First-Order Second Moment (FOSM) method, and (3) Modified Point Estimate (MPE) method, were compared in terms of computational efficiency and accuracy for evaluation of contaminant concentration at a down-gradient receptor. Benzene and chloride, two contaminants most commonly found in petroleum exploration and production waste, were analyzed for two waste disposal scenarios, i.e. (1) closed waste pit, and (2) landspreading. Using MC method as the basis for comparison, results of the analysis suggested the use of FOSM method as the most attractive alternative to the more tedious MC method. Based on 2000 MC simulations for analysis, the FOSM method required 1.053% of the computational effort required for the MC analysis. Considering a regulatory guideline of 85% probability level of exceedance, results of the analysis indicated that the MPE method consistently underestimated the benzene concentration and overestimated the chloride concentration at a receptor, whereas the FOSM analyses indicate good agreement with MC method. However, in the event where a more precise and complete analysis is mandatory, the MC method remains the most appropriate methodology available."],"dc:description.degree":["Master of Science"],"dc:format.medium":["BTD"],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.other":["etd-08182009-040359"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/44280"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:publisher":["Virginia Tech"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright"],"dc:rights.uri":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:title":["A comparison of uncertainty analysis methods for the modeling of land disposal of petroleum exploration and production waste"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.dcmitype":["Text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Environmental Planning"],"thesis:degree_level":["masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science"],"thesis:institution_name":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:19:13Z"}