{"id":{"repo_id":"vt","oai_identifier":"oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/44020"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/vt/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/44020","repository":{"repo_id":"vt","name":"Virginia Tech","base_url":"https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"The measurement and comparison of relative workloads under several driving conditions using a simulator","abstract":"A secondary task measure was used to evaluate the effects of various automobile handling characteristics on driver workload. The study was performed using the VPI & SU driving simulator, a variable speed random number generator and display, plus other control and recording equipment. Workload scores for 82 subjects were determined under various combinations of wind and curvature disturbances, vehicle steering gain, and vehicle response time. Driving performance was analyzed to measure intrusiveness of the secondary task and to confirm workload differences. The results showed definite differences across the levels of combined wind and curvature. These supported the assumption that the secondary task measure would be capable of measuring differences in driver workload. No significant differences in workload scores were obtained for changes in steering gain or vehicle response time. The secondary task did intrude on the primary task, indicating that its use may cause experimental complications. The method and equipment appear to be useable in either simulator or on-the-road vehicles.","abstract_html":"A secondary task measure was used to evaluate the effects of various automobile handling characteristics on driver workload. The study was performed using the VPI &amp; SU driving simulator, a variable speed random number generator and display, plus other control and recording equipment. Workload scores for 82 subjects were determined under various combinations of wind and curvature disturbances, vehicle steering gain, and vehicle response time. Driving performance was analyzed to measure intrusiveness of the secondary task and to confirm workload differences. The results showed definite differences across the levels of combined wind and curvature. These supported the assumption that the secondary task measure would be capable of measuring differences in driver workload. No significant differences in workload scores were obtained for changes in steering gain or vehicle response time. The secondary task did intrude on the primary task, indicating that its use may cause experimental complications. The method and equipment appear to be useable in either simulator or on-the-road vehicles.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Gross, Florus Gerhardt"],"institution":"Virginia Tech","degree_name":"Master of Science","degree_level":"masters","degree_discipline":"Industrial Engineering and Operations Research","degree_department":"Industrial Engineering and Operations Research","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":["Wierwille, Walter W."],"committee_members":["Snyder, Harry L.","Price, Dennis L."],"year":1977,"date_issued":"1977-02-05","date_published":"1977-02-05","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:19:48Z","subjects":[],"languages":[],"rights":["In Copyright"],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-07292010-020023"],"render_values":[{"text":"etd-07292010-020023","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10919/44020","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.committeechair","label":"Committee Chair","values":["Wierwille, Walter W."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Snyder, Harry L.","Price, Dennis L."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Industrial Engineering and Operations Research"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Gross, Florus Gerhardt"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2014-03-14T21:41:44Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2014-03-14T21:41:44Z","2010-07-29"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["1977-02-05"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Virginia Tech"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.dcmitype","label":"Dc Type Dcmitype","values":["Text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Industrial Engineering and Operations Research"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright"]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-07292010-020023"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/44020"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["A secondary task measure was used to evaluate the effects of various automobile handling characteristics on driver workload. The study was performed using the VPI & SU driving simulator, a variable speed random number generator and display, plus other control and recording equipment. Workload scores for 82 subjects were determined under various combinations of wind and curvature disturbances, vehicle steering gain, and vehicle response time. Driving performance was analyzed to measure intrusiveness of the secondary task and to confirm workload differences. The results showed definite differences across the levels of combined wind and curvature. These supported the assumption that the secondary task measure would be capable of measuring differences in driver workload. No significant differences in workload scores were obtained for changes in steering gain or vehicle response time. The secondary task did intrude on the primary task, indicating that its use may cause experimental complications. The method and equipment appear to be useable in either simulator or on-the-road vehicles."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["Master of Science"]},{"key":"dc:format.medium","label":"Dc Format Medium","values":["BTD"]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The measurement and comparison of relative workloads under several driving conditions using a simulator"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.committeechair":["Wierwille, Walter W."],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Snyder, Harry L.","Price, Dennis L."],"dc:contributor.department":["Industrial Engineering and Operations Research"],"dc:creator":["Gross, Florus Gerhardt"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2014-03-14T21:41:44Z"],"dc:date.available":["2014-03-14T21:41:44Z","2010-07-29"],"dc:date.issued":["1977-02-05"],"dc:description.abstract":["A secondary task measure was used to evaluate the effects of various automobile handling characteristics on driver workload. The study was performed using the VPI & SU driving simulator, a variable speed random number generator and display, plus other control and recording equipment. Workload scores for 82 subjects were determined under various combinations of wind and curvature disturbances, vehicle steering gain, and vehicle response time. Driving performance was analyzed to measure intrusiveness of the secondary task and to confirm workload differences. The results showed definite differences across the levels of combined wind and curvature. These supported the assumption that the secondary task measure would be capable of measuring differences in driver workload. No significant differences in workload scores were obtained for changes in steering gain or vehicle response time. The secondary task did intrude on the primary task, indicating that its use may cause experimental complications. The method and equipment appear to be useable in either simulator or on-the-road vehicles."],"dc:description.degree":["Master of Science"],"dc:format.medium":["BTD"],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.other":["etd-07292010-020023"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/44020"],"dc:publisher":["Virginia Tech"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright"],"dc:rights.uri":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:title":["The measurement and comparison of relative workloads under several driving conditions using a simulator"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.dcmitype":["Text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Industrial Engineering and Operations Research"],"thesis:degree_level":["masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science"],"thesis:institution_name":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:19:48Z"}