{"id":{"repo_id":"vt","oai_identifier":"oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/43548"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/vt/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/43548","repository":{"repo_id":"vt","name":"Virginia Tech","base_url":"https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Effect of locus of control and instructions on speech performance under delayed auditory feedback","abstract":"The present study investigated the effects of locus of control and differential instructions on speech performance under delayed auditory feedback (DAF). It was hypothesized that internals would perform better under skill instructions than under chance instructions, and conversely, that externals would perform better under chance instructions than under skill instructions. In a 2x2x2 design, internal and external <u>S</u>s received either skill or chance instructions prior to performing under DAF. The results indicated that Internal-males under skill instructions made fewer speech errors than Internal-males under chance instructions and that External-females under chance instructions made fewer speech errors than External-females under skill instructions. It was also demonstrated that internal <u>S</u>s take less time to complete the DAF task under skill instructions than under chance instructions. Thus the hypothesis was only partially confirmed. The results were interpreted in terms of Rotter and Mulry's (1965) theory which attributed better performance to motivational factors; Watson and Baumal's (1968) theory which attributed poorer performance to anxiety; and to an additional factor defined as an active-passive dimension.","abstract_html":"The present study investigated the effects of locus of control and differential instructions on speech performance under delayed auditory feedback (DAF). It was hypothesized that internals would perform better under skill instructions than under chance instructions, and conversely, that externals would perform better under chance instructions than under skill instructions. In a 2x2x2 design, internal and external &lt;u&gt;S&lt;/u&gt;s received either skill or chance instructions prior to performing under DAF. The results indicated that Internal-males under skill instructions made fewer speech errors than Internal-males under chance instructions and that External-females under chance instructions made fewer speech errors than External-females under skill instructions. It was also demonstrated that internal &lt;u&gt;S&lt;/u&gt;s take less time to complete the DAF task under skill instructions than under chance instructions. Thus the hypothesis was only partially confirmed. The results were interpreted in terms of Rotter and Mulry&#x27;s (1965) theory which attributed better performance to motivational factors; Watson and Baumal&#x27;s (1968) theory which attributed poorer performance to anxiety; and to an additional factor defined as an active-passive dimension.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Wood, Gloria Blanche"],"institution":"Virginia Tech","degree_name":"Master of Science","degree_level":"masters","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":"Psychology","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1973,"date_issued":"1973","date_published":"1973","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:19:03Z","subjects":[],"languages":[],"rights":["In Copyright"],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-07072010-020145"],"render_values":[{"text":"etd-07072010-020145","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10919/43548","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Wood, Gloria Blanche"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2014-03-14T21:39:37Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2014-03-14T21:39:37Z","2010-07-07"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["1973"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Virginia Tech"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.dcmitype","label":"Dc Type Dcmitype","values":["Text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright"]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-07072010-020145"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/43548"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The present study investigated the effects of locus of control and differential instructions on speech performance under delayed auditory feedback (DAF). It was hypothesized that internals would perform better under skill instructions than under chance instructions, and conversely, that externals would perform better under chance instructions than under skill instructions. In a 2x2x2 design, internal and external <u>S</u>s received either skill or chance instructions prior to performing under DAF. The results indicated that Internal-males under skill instructions made fewer speech errors than Internal-males under chance instructions and that External-females under chance instructions made fewer speech errors than External-females under skill instructions. It was also demonstrated that internal <u>S</u>s take less time to complete the DAF task under skill instructions than under chance instructions. Thus the hypothesis was only partially confirmed. The results were interpreted in terms of Rotter and Mulry's (1965) theory which attributed better performance to motivational factors; Watson and Baumal's (1968) theory which attributed poorer performance to anxiety; and to an additional factor defined as an active-passive dimension."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["Master of Science"]},{"key":"dc:format.medium","label":"Dc Format Medium","values":["BTD"]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Effect of locus of control and instructions on speech performance under delayed auditory feedback"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.department":["Psychology"],"dc:creator":["Wood, Gloria Blanche"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2014-03-14T21:39:37Z"],"dc:date.available":["2014-03-14T21:39:37Z","2010-07-07"],"dc:date.issued":["1973"],"dc:description.abstract":["The present study investigated the effects of locus of control and differential instructions on speech performance under delayed auditory feedback (DAF). It was hypothesized that internals would perform better under skill instructions than under chance instructions, and conversely, that externals would perform better under chance instructions than under skill instructions. In a 2x2x2 design, internal and external <u>S</u>s received either skill or chance instructions prior to performing under DAF. The results indicated that Internal-males under skill instructions made fewer speech errors than Internal-males under chance instructions and that External-females under chance instructions made fewer speech errors than External-females under skill instructions. It was also demonstrated that internal <u>S</u>s take less time to complete the DAF task under skill instructions than under chance instructions. Thus the hypothesis was only partially confirmed. The results were interpreted in terms of Rotter and Mulry's (1965) theory which attributed better performance to motivational factors; Watson and Baumal's (1968) theory which attributed poorer performance to anxiety; and to an additional factor defined as an active-passive dimension."],"dc:description.degree":["Master of Science"],"dc:format.medium":["BTD"],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.other":["etd-07072010-020145"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/43548"],"dc:publisher":["Virginia Tech"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright"],"dc:rights.uri":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:title":["Effect of locus of control and instructions on speech performance under delayed auditory feedback"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.dcmitype":["Text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science"],"thesis:institution_name":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:19:03Z"}