Back to results

Virginia Tech

A comparison of coalition bargaining and the selective strike technique

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

This thesis has examined the genesis and implementation of the selective strike technique as used by the United Transportation Union against railroad managements, and compared the effectiveness of this technique with coalition bargaining as has been used in other industries for the purpose of gaining greater equality with management at the bargaining table. The purpose of the study was, first, to determine if the selective strike is legal and does not represent an attempt to subvert the dispute resolution procedures of the Railway Labor Act; and, second, to determine if the selective strike is a workable substitute for coalition bargaining whereby a union (and the employer) can avoid intervention by the government under the Railway Labor Act national emergency dispute provisions. To accomplish the study, a thorough review was made of the Railway Labor Act, problems which have been encountered under the Act and some of the solutions which have been proposed to solve these problems, including the selective strike technique. The genesis, use and results of coalition bargaining were also examined. It was also necessary to make a thorough review of the court actions and decisions relating to the use of the selective strike. To place in proper perspective the importance of the selective strike to rail labor unions, extensive interviews were conducted with the former president of the United Transportation Union, Charles Luna, and the union's general counsel, Robert Hart. It was Mr. Luna who perfected the use of the selective strike technique and Mr. Hart who directed the legal battle on behalf of the union, when rail management's questioned the legality of the technique. It was concluded that the selective strike is a legal technique and does not subvert the dispute resolution procedures of the Railway Labor Act; and that the selective strike is a workable substitute for coalition bargaining in allowing rail labor greater equality at the bargaining table with railroad managements.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Master of Science
Level thesis:degree_level
masters
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Business Administration
Department dc:contributor.department
Business Administration
Grantor dc:publisher
Virginia Tech
Year dc:date.issued
1976

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Wilner, Frank Neil

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • In Copyright

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Dc Identifier Other
etd-06122010-020158
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/43232

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Virginia Tech
Base URL
vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
related terms
citation

Wilner, Frank Neil. A comparison of coalition bargaining and the selective strike technique. masters thesis, Virginia Tech, 1976. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/43232