{"id":{"repo_id":"vt","oai_identifier":"oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/42846"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/vt/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/42846","repository":{"repo_id":"vt","name":"Virginia Tech","base_url":"https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"The effects of social and spatial density upon attraction, crowding, task performance, and mood","abstract":"Males placed in one of two room sizes and one of two group sizes engaged in several group discussions, performed anagrams tasks, and served as members of a mock jury. Results indicated that subjects liked each other more in small groups than in large groups, that subjects in large rooms reported feeling more negative emotions than those in small rooms, that subjects felt more crowded in small rooms than in large ones, and that small rooms contained more information than large ones. Subjects performed better on the anagrams tasks, liking for group members increased, and reports of negative emotive feelings decreased as the experiment progressed. Results have theoretical and methodological implications since (1) social density is shown to be different than spatial density, (2) there are time-dependent effects, (3) \"crowding\" as an intervening variable cannot mediate observed effects of social density, and (4) subjects in the large. group, large room condition showed the greatest number of deleterious effects of treatment. Various theoretical mechanisms and their applicability to the present study are discussed.","abstract_html":"Males placed in one of two room sizes and one of two group sizes engaged in several group discussions, performed anagrams tasks, and served as members of a mock jury. Results indicated that subjects liked each other more in small groups than in large groups, that subjects in large rooms reported feeling more negative emotions than those in small rooms, that subjects felt more crowded in small rooms than in large ones, and that small rooms contained more information than large ones. Subjects performed better on the anagrams tasks, liking for group members increased, and reports of negative emotive feelings decreased as the experiment progressed. Results have theoretical and methodological implications since (1) social density is shown to be different than spatial density, (2) there are time-dependent effects, (3) &quot;crowding&quot; as an intervening variable cannot mediate observed effects of social density, and (4) subjects in the large. group, large room condition showed the greatest number of deleterious effects of treatment. Various theoretical mechanisms and their applicability to the present study are discussed.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Poe, Donald Bryce"],"institution":"Virginia Tech","degree_name":"Master of Science","degree_level":"masters","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":"Psychology","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1975,"date_issued":"1975","date_published":"1975","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:19:16Z","subjects":[],"languages":[],"rights":["In Copyright"],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-06022010-020238"],"render_values":[{"text":"etd-06022010-020238","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10919/42846","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Poe, Donald Bryce"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2014-03-14T21:36:49Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2014-03-14T21:36:49Z","2010-06-02"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["1975"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Virginia Tech"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.dcmitype","label":"Dc Type Dcmitype","values":["Text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright"]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-06022010-020238"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/42846"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Males placed in one of two room sizes and one of two group sizes engaged in several group discussions, performed anagrams tasks, and served as members of a mock jury. Results indicated that subjects liked each other more in small groups than in large groups, that subjects in large rooms reported feeling more negative emotions than those in small rooms, that subjects felt more crowded in small rooms than in large ones, and that small rooms contained more information than large ones. Subjects performed better on the anagrams tasks, liking for group members increased, and reports of negative emotive feelings decreased as the experiment progressed. Results have theoretical and methodological implications since (1) social density is shown to be different than spatial density, (2) there are time-dependent effects, (3) \"crowding\" as an intervening variable cannot mediate observed effects of social density, and (4) subjects in the large. group, large room condition showed the greatest number of deleterious effects of treatment. Various theoretical mechanisms and their applicability to the present study are discussed."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["Master of Science"]},{"key":"dc:format.medium","label":"Dc Format Medium","values":["BTD"]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The effects of social and spatial density upon attraction, crowding, task performance, and mood"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.department":["Psychology"],"dc:creator":["Poe, Donald Bryce"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2014-03-14T21:36:49Z"],"dc:date.available":["2014-03-14T21:36:49Z","2010-06-02"],"dc:date.issued":["1975"],"dc:description.abstract":["Males placed in one of two room sizes and one of two group sizes engaged in several group discussions, performed anagrams tasks, and served as members of a mock jury. Results indicated that subjects liked each other more in small groups than in large groups, that subjects in large rooms reported feeling more negative emotions than those in small rooms, that subjects felt more crowded in small rooms than in large ones, and that small rooms contained more information than large ones. Subjects performed better on the anagrams tasks, liking for group members increased, and reports of negative emotive feelings decreased as the experiment progressed. Results have theoretical and methodological implications since (1) social density is shown to be different than spatial density, (2) there are time-dependent effects, (3) \"crowding\" as an intervening variable cannot mediate observed effects of social density, and (4) subjects in the large. group, large room condition showed the greatest number of deleterious effects of treatment. Various theoretical mechanisms and their applicability to the present study are discussed."],"dc:description.degree":["Master of Science"],"dc:format.medium":["BTD"],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.other":["etd-06022010-020238"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/42846"],"dc:publisher":["Virginia Tech"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright"],"dc:rights.uri":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:title":["The effects of social and spatial density upon attraction, crowding, task performance, and mood"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.dcmitype":["Text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science"],"thesis:institution_name":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:19:16Z"}