{"id":{"repo_id":"vt","oai_identifier":"oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/41720"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/vt/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/41720","repository":{"repo_id":"vt","name":"Virginia Tech","base_url":"https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Effect of processing parameters on the detection of animal drug residues in milk","abstract":"The advent of new methods to detect animal drug residues has resulted in a need to independently validate them. The effects of processing milk on the performance of these methods was evaluated. Antibiotic-free milk samples were spiked with sulfamethazine, penicillin G, and chlortetracycline at levels of 10, 10 and 30 ppb, respectively. Spiked milk and negative control milk was heat-treated, homogenized or heat-treated and homogenized. The procedures evaluated for penicillin detection were Bacillus stearothermophilus disk assay, a HPLC described by Barker et al., Charm II microbial receptor assay, and CITE Probe and LacTek enzyme immunoassays. The procedures evaluated for sulfonamide detection were an HPLC method described by Long et al., Charm II microbial receptor assay, CITE Probe, LacTek and Signal enzyme immunoassays. The methods evaluated for tetracycline detection were a HPLC method described by Long et al., Charm II microbial receptor assay, and LacTek and CITE Probe enzyme immunoassays. The results indicate that the commercial tests and the disk assay were not adversely affected by processing treatments. Significant treatment differences were found when testing raw Charm II data by analysis of variance but these differences did not effect the overall results of the test. Results of the HPLC method were inconclusive for the three drugs tested.","abstract_html":"The advent of new methods to detect animal drug residues has resulted in a need to independently validate them. The effects of processing milk on the performance of these methods was evaluated. Antibiotic-free milk samples were spiked with sulfamethazine, penicillin G, and chlortetracycline at levels of 10, 10 and 30 ppb, respectively. Spiked milk and negative control milk was heat-treated, homogenized or heat-treated and homogenized. The procedures evaluated for penicillin detection were Bacillus stearothermophilus disk assay, a HPLC described by Barker et al., Charm II microbial receptor assay, and CITE Probe and LacTek enzyme immunoassays. The procedures evaluated for sulfonamide detection were an HPLC method described by Long et al., Charm II microbial receptor assay, CITE Probe, LacTek and Signal enzyme immunoassays. The methods evaluated for tetracycline detection were a HPLC method described by Long et al., Charm II microbial receptor assay, and LacTek and CITE Probe enzyme immunoassays. The results indicate that the commercial tests and the disk assay were not adversely affected by processing treatments. Significant treatment differences were found when testing raw Charm II data by analysis of variance but these differences did not effect the overall results of the test. Results of the HPLC method were inconclusive for the three drugs tested.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Conner, Tonya Michele"],"institution":"Virginia Tech","degree_name":"Master of Science","degree_level":"masters","degree_discipline":"Food Science and Technology","degree_department":"Food Science and Technology","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":["Bishop, J. Russell"],"committee_members":["Duncan, Susan E.","Jones, Gerald M."],"year":1992,"date_issued":"1992-08-05","date_published":"1992-08-05","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:56:22Z","subjects":[],"languages":["en"],"rights":["In Copyright"],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-03172010-020648"],"render_values":[{"text":"etd-03172010-020648","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10919/41720","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.committeechair","label":"Committee Chair","values":["Bishop, J. Russell"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Duncan, Susan E.","Jones, Gerald M."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Food Science and Technology"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Conner, Tonya Michele"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2014-03-14T21:32:05Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2014-03-14T21:32:05Z","2010-03-17"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["1992-08-05"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Virginia Tech"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.dcmitype","label":"Dc Type Dcmitype","values":["Text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Food Science and Technology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright"]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-03172010-020648"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/41720"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The advent of new methods to detect animal drug residues has resulted in a need to independently validate them. The effects of processing milk on the performance of these methods was evaluated. Antibiotic-free milk samples were spiked with sulfamethazine, penicillin G, and chlortetracycline at levels of 10, 10 and 30 ppb, respectively. Spiked milk and negative control milk was heat-treated, homogenized or heat-treated and homogenized. The procedures evaluated for penicillin detection were Bacillus stearothermophilus disk assay, a HPLC described by Barker et al., Charm II microbial receptor assay, and CITE Probe and LacTek enzyme immunoassays. The procedures evaluated for sulfonamide detection were an HPLC method described by Long et al., Charm II microbial receptor assay, CITE Probe, LacTek and Signal enzyme immunoassays. The methods evaluated for tetracycline detection were a HPLC method described by Long et al., Charm II microbial receptor assay, and LacTek and CITE Probe enzyme immunoassays. The results indicate that the commercial tests and the disk assay were not adversely affected by processing treatments. Significant treatment differences were found when testing raw Charm II data by analysis of variance but these differences did not effect the overall results of the test. Results of the HPLC method were inconclusive for the three drugs tested."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["Master of Science"]},{"key":"dc:format.medium","label":"Dc Format Medium","values":["BTD"]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Effect of processing parameters on the detection of animal drug residues in milk"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.committeechair":["Bishop, J. Russell"],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Duncan, Susan E.","Jones, Gerald M."],"dc:contributor.department":["Food Science and Technology"],"dc:creator":["Conner, Tonya Michele"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2014-03-14T21:32:05Z"],"dc:date.available":["2014-03-14T21:32:05Z","2010-03-17"],"dc:date.issued":["1992-08-05"],"dc:description.abstract":["The advent of new methods to detect animal drug residues has resulted in a need to independently validate them. The effects of processing milk on the performance of these methods was evaluated. Antibiotic-free milk samples were spiked with sulfamethazine, penicillin G, and chlortetracycline at levels of 10, 10 and 30 ppb, respectively. Spiked milk and negative control milk was heat-treated, homogenized or heat-treated and homogenized. The procedures evaluated for penicillin detection were Bacillus stearothermophilus disk assay, a HPLC described by Barker et al., Charm II microbial receptor assay, and CITE Probe and LacTek enzyme immunoassays. The procedures evaluated for sulfonamide detection were an HPLC method described by Long et al., Charm II microbial receptor assay, CITE Probe, LacTek and Signal enzyme immunoassays. The methods evaluated for tetracycline detection were a HPLC method described by Long et al., Charm II microbial receptor assay, and LacTek and CITE Probe enzyme immunoassays. The results indicate that the commercial tests and the disk assay were not adversely affected by processing treatments. Significant treatment differences were found when testing raw Charm II data by analysis of variance but these differences did not effect the overall results of the test. Results of the HPLC method were inconclusive for the three drugs tested."],"dc:description.degree":["Master of Science"],"dc:format.medium":["BTD"],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.other":["etd-03172010-020648"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/41720"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:publisher":["Virginia Tech"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright"],"dc:rights.uri":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:title":["Effect of processing parameters on the detection of animal drug residues in milk"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.dcmitype":["Text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Food Science and Technology"],"thesis:degree_level":["masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science"],"thesis:institution_name":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:56:22Z"}