{"id":{"repo_id":"vt","oai_identifier":"oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/41396"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/vt/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/41396","repository":{"repo_id":"vt","name":"Virginia Tech","base_url":"https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Evaluation of the dynamic characteristics of the K-Gill anemometer","abstract":"The dynamic characteristics of the K-Gill anemometer were evaluated by comparing the anemometer with a hot wire system in a field test, after the static characteristics of the anemometer had been evaluated in a wind tunnel test. The wind tunnel test showed a non-linear and a non-cosine behavior, as shown in previous studies (Ataktürk, 1988; Pond et al., 1979). The turbulence energy spectra from the field test revealed that the propeller anemometer behaves like a single-pole low-pass RC filter, as suggested in previous studies (Ataktürk, 1988; Pond et al., 1979; MacCready and Jex, 1964). The test results showed that mean wind velocity components can be measured with an error of 2%. To determine the Reynolds stress values, uw covariance and friction velocity from different methods were compared. When the stability conditions were unknown, the resulting Reynolds stress estimations have 15% relative differences between different methods.","abstract_html":"The dynamic characteristics of the K-Gill anemometer were evaluated by comparing the anemometer with a hot wire system in a field test, after the static characteristics of the anemometer had been evaluated in a wind tunnel test. The wind tunnel test showed a non-linear and a non-cosine behavior, as shown in previous studies (Ataktürk, 1988; Pond et al., 1979). The turbulence energy spectra from the field test revealed that the propeller anemometer behaves like a single-pole low-pass RC filter, as suggested in previous studies (Ataktürk, 1988; Pond et al., 1979; MacCready and Jex, 1964). The test results showed that mean wind velocity components can be measured with an error of 2%. To determine the Reynolds stress values, uw covariance and friction velocity from different methods were compared. When the stability conditions were unknown, the resulting Reynolds stress estimations have 15% relative differences between different methods.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Wei, Chunghwa"],"institution":"Virginia Tech","degree_name":"Master of Science","degree_level":"masters","degree_discipline":"Aerospace Engineering","degree_department":"Aerospace Engineering","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1990,"date_issued":"1990","date_published":"1990","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:19:57Z","subjects":[],"languages":["en"],"rights":["In Copyright"],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-03042009-040509"],"render_values":[{"text":"etd-03042009-040509","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10919/41396","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Aerospace Engineering"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Wei, Chunghwa"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2014-03-14T21:30:49Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2014-03-14T21:30:49Z","2009-03-04"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["1990"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Virginia Tech"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.dcmitype","label":"Dc Type Dcmitype","values":["Text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Aerospace Engineering"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright"]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-03042009-040509"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/41396"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The dynamic characteristics of the K-Gill anemometer were evaluated by comparing the anemometer with a hot wire system in a field test, after the static characteristics of the anemometer had been evaluated in a wind tunnel test. The wind tunnel test showed a non-linear and a non-cosine behavior, as shown in previous studies (Ataktürk, 1988; Pond et al., 1979). The turbulence energy spectra from the field test revealed that the propeller anemometer behaves like a single-pole low-pass RC filter, as suggested in previous studies (Ataktürk, 1988; Pond et al., 1979; MacCready and Jex, 1964). The test results showed that mean wind velocity components can be measured with an error of 2%. To determine the Reynolds stress values, uw covariance and friction velocity from different methods were compared. When the stability conditions were unknown, the resulting Reynolds stress estimations have 15% relative differences between different methods."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["Master of Science"]},{"key":"dc:format.medium","label":"Dc Format Medium","values":["BTD"]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Evaluation of the dynamic characteristics of the K-Gill anemometer"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.department":["Aerospace Engineering"],"dc:creator":["Wei, Chunghwa"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2014-03-14T21:30:49Z"],"dc:date.available":["2014-03-14T21:30:49Z","2009-03-04"],"dc:date.issued":["1990"],"dc:description.abstract":["The dynamic characteristics of the K-Gill anemometer were evaluated by comparing the anemometer with a hot wire system in a field test, after the static characteristics of the anemometer had been evaluated in a wind tunnel test. The wind tunnel test showed a non-linear and a non-cosine behavior, as shown in previous studies (Ataktürk, 1988; Pond et al., 1979). The turbulence energy spectra from the field test revealed that the propeller anemometer behaves like a single-pole low-pass RC filter, as suggested in previous studies (Ataktürk, 1988; Pond et al., 1979; MacCready and Jex, 1964). The test results showed that mean wind velocity components can be measured with an error of 2%. To determine the Reynolds stress values, uw covariance and friction velocity from different methods were compared. When the stability conditions were unknown, the resulting Reynolds stress estimations have 15% relative differences between different methods."],"dc:description.degree":["Master of Science"],"dc:format.medium":["BTD"],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.other":["etd-03042009-040509"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/41396"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:publisher":["Virginia Tech"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright"],"dc:rights.uri":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:title":["Evaluation of the dynamic characteristics of the K-Gill anemometer"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.dcmitype":["Text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Aerospace Engineering"],"thesis:degree_level":["masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science"],"thesis:institution_name":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:19:57Z"}