{"id":{"repo_id":"vt","oai_identifier":"oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/41103"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/vt/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/41103","repository":{"repo_id":"vt","name":"Virginia Tech","base_url":"https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Lying in children as a function of adult monitoring","abstract":"A procedure similar to correspondence training was used to assess the propensity of children to lie under varying levels of adult monitoring. Thirteen children selected pieces of food to be eaten later as a snack, and reported their selections to an experimenter. The manipulation involved reinforcement for reports of having selected a previously unselected food. Eleven of 13 subjects were completely honest with no differences between subjects with a history of frequent lying and subjects with a generally honest history. These data are inconsistent with previously published correspondence training studies. Subjects may have responded to environmental cues that served as discriminative stimuli indicating that subjects' behavior was being monitored. Subjects may have entered the study with a generalized correspondence rule which left their behavior insensitive to contingencies in the protocol. Parental reports of frequent motives for lying and behavior problem scores are also reported. Suggested directions for future research within this paradigm include comparisons across levels of cognitive development, incorporating naturalistic settings with more familiar adults, examining influence of live or symbolic modeling of lying, and using more clearly aversive target behaviors.","abstract_html":"A procedure similar to correspondence training was used to assess the propensity of children to lie under varying levels of adult monitoring. Thirteen children selected pieces of food to be eaten later as a snack, and reported their selections to an experimenter. The manipulation involved reinforcement for reports of having selected a previously unselected food. Eleven of 13 subjects were completely honest with no differences between subjects with a history of frequent lying and subjects with a generally honest history. These data are inconsistent with previously published correspondence training studies. Subjects may have responded to environmental cues that served as discriminative stimuli indicating that subjects' behavior was being monitored. Subjects may have entered the study with a generalized correspondence rule which left their behavior insensitive to contingencies in the protocol. Parental reports of frequent motives for lying and behavior problem scores are also reported. Suggested directions for future research within this paradigm include comparisons across levels of cognitive development, incorporating naturalistic settings with more familiar adults, examining influence of live or symbolic modeling of lying, and using more clearly aversive target behaviors.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Jaquess, David Lynn"],"institution":"Virginia Tech","degree_name":"Master of Science","degree_level":"masters","degree_discipline":"Clinical Psychology","degree_department":"Psychology","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":["Finney, Jack W."],"committee_members":["Franchina, Joseph J.","Ollendick, Thomas H."],"year":1990,"date_issued":"1990-11-05","date_published":"1990-11-05","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:18:55Z","subjects":[],"languages":["en"],"rights":["In Copyright"],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-02132009-172504"],"render_values":[{"text":"etd-02132009-172504","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10919/41103","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.committeechair","label":"Committee Chair","values":["Finney, Jack W."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Franchina, Joseph J.","Ollendick, Thomas H."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Jaquess, David Lynn"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2014-03-14T21:29:21Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2014-03-14T21:29:21Z","2009-02-13"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["1990-11-05"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Virginia Tech"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.dcmitype","label":"Dc Type Dcmitype","values":["Text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Clinical Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright"]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-02132009-172504"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/41103"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["A procedure similar to correspondence training was used to assess the propensity of children to lie under varying levels of adult monitoring. Thirteen children selected pieces of food to be eaten later as a snack, and reported their selections to an experimenter. The manipulation involved reinforcement for reports of having selected a previously unselected food. Eleven of 13 subjects were completely honest with no differences between subjects with a history of frequent lying and subjects with a generally honest history. These data are inconsistent with previously published correspondence training studies. Subjects may have responded to environmental cues that served as discriminative stimuli indicating that subjects' behavior was being monitored. Subjects may have entered the study with a generalized correspondence rule which left their behavior insensitive to contingencies in the protocol. Parental reports of frequent motives for lying and behavior problem scores are also reported. Suggested directions for future research within this paradigm include comparisons across levels of cognitive development, incorporating naturalistic settings with more familiar adults, examining influence of live or symbolic modeling of lying, and using more clearly aversive target behaviors."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["Master of Science"]},{"key":"dc:format.medium","label":"Dc Format Medium","values":["BTD"]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Lying in children as a function of adult monitoring"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.committeechair":["Finney, Jack W."],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Franchina, Joseph J.","Ollendick, Thomas H."],"dc:contributor.department":["Psychology"],"dc:creator":["Jaquess, David Lynn"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2014-03-14T21:29:21Z"],"dc:date.available":["2014-03-14T21:29:21Z","2009-02-13"],"dc:date.issued":["1990-11-05"],"dc:description.abstract":["A procedure similar to correspondence training was used to assess the propensity of children to lie under varying levels of adult monitoring. Thirteen children selected pieces of food to be eaten later as a snack, and reported their selections to an experimenter. The manipulation involved reinforcement for reports of having selected a previously unselected food. Eleven of 13 subjects were completely honest with no differences between subjects with a history of frequent lying and subjects with a generally honest history. These data are inconsistent with previously published correspondence training studies. Subjects may have responded to environmental cues that served as discriminative stimuli indicating that subjects' behavior was being monitored. Subjects may have entered the study with a generalized correspondence rule which left their behavior insensitive to contingencies in the protocol. Parental reports of frequent motives for lying and behavior problem scores are also reported. Suggested directions for future research within this paradigm include comparisons across levels of cognitive development, incorporating naturalistic settings with more familiar adults, examining influence of live or symbolic modeling of lying, and using more clearly aversive target behaviors."],"dc:description.degree":["Master of Science"],"dc:format.medium":["BTD"],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.other":["etd-02132009-172504"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/41103"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:publisher":["Virginia Tech"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright"],"dc:rights.uri":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:title":["Lying in children as a function of adult monitoring"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.dcmitype":["Text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Clinical Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science"],"thesis:institution_name":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:18:55Z"}