{"id":{"repo_id":"vt","oai_identifier":"oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/41088"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/vt/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/41088","repository":{"repo_id":"vt","name":"Virginia Tech","base_url":"https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Alternative suburban settlements","abstract":"This Thesis begins with two premises. As architects: I. We assume responsibility for the built environment. II. We should perceive and address change in society. The focus is an exploration into possible solutions to the paradigm of the suburban settlement. 1995 The condition of life in suburbia is currently drifting away from the ever-changing reality of our culture. The strongly infused notion of a private dwelling amidst a green grass setting has been the normative goal of living for most of our society during its evolution, but particularly since WWII. Much of what is built in suburbia today is done through the inertia of habit. The suburbs continue to be built as if families were large and supported by one income; and as if land and energy were boundless. These conditions have led to patterns of growth which are dysfunctional. The vast land areas covered by this type of settlement require ever-expanding roadways, which in turn become less and less practical to those who live there. More time is devoured daily by getting from one place to another, through a landscape of built sameness. The controlled environments people typically live in; the automobile, workplace, and house, diminish the possibilities of insightful experience that are a part of life in either urban or rural settings. Suburbia, as a place between extremes, offers diluted opportunities for a richness in the quality of life. The architecture of the suburban condition needs to make places which allow both social interaction and truer connections to nature.","abstract_html":"This Thesis begins with two premises. As architects: I. We assume responsibility for the built environment. II. We should perceive and address change in society. The focus is an exploration into possible solutions to the paradigm of the suburban settlement. 1995 The condition of life in suburbia is currently drifting away from the ever-changing reality of our culture. The strongly infused notion of a private dwelling amidst a green grass setting has been the normative goal of living for most of our society during its evolution, but particularly since WWII. Much of what is built in suburbia today is done through the inertia of habit. The suburbs continue to be built as if families were large and supported by one income; and as if land and energy were boundless. These conditions have led to patterns of growth which are dysfunctional. The vast land areas covered by this type of settlement require ever-expanding roadways, which in turn become less and less practical to those who live there. More time is devoured daily by getting from one place to another, through a landscape of built sameness. The controlled environments people typically live in; the automobile, workplace, and house, diminish the possibilities of insightful experience that are a part of life in either urban or rural settings. Suburbia, as a place between extremes, offers diluted opportunities for a richness in the quality of life. The architecture of the suburban condition needs to make places which allow both social interaction and truer connections to nature.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["DiMarco, Daniel Joseph"],"institution":"Virginia Tech","degree_name":"Master of Architecture","degree_level":"masters","degree_discipline":"Architecture","degree_department":"Architecture","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":["Brown, William W."],"committee_members":["Sarpaneva, Pia","Mashburn, Joseph L."],"year":1995,"date_issued":"1995-08-05","date_published":"1995-08-05","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:20:32Z","subjects":["built environment"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["In Copyright"],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-02132009-172258"],"render_values":[{"text":"etd-02132009-172258","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10919/41088","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.committeechair","label":"Committee Chair","values":["Brown, William W."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Sarpaneva, Pia","Mashburn, Joseph L."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Architecture"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["DiMarco, Daniel Joseph"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2014-03-14T21:29:18Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2014-03-14T21:29:18Z","2009-02-13"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["1995-08-05"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Virginia Tech"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.dcmitype","label":"Dc Type Dcmitype","values":["Text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Architecture"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Architecture"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["built environment"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright"]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-02132009-172258"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/41088"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This Thesis begins with two premises. As architects: I. We assume responsibility for the built environment. II. We should perceive and address change in society. The focus is an exploration into possible solutions to the paradigm of the suburban settlement. 1995 The condition of life in suburbia is currently drifting away from the ever-changing reality of our culture. The strongly infused notion of a private dwelling amidst a green grass setting has been the normative goal of living for most of our society during its evolution, but particularly since WWII. Much of what is built in suburbia today is done through the inertia of habit. The suburbs continue to be built as if families were large and supported by one income; and as if land and energy were boundless. These conditions have led to patterns of growth which are dysfunctional. The vast land areas covered by this type of settlement require ever-expanding roadways, which in turn become less and less practical to those who live there. More time is devoured daily by getting from one place to another, through a landscape of built sameness. The controlled environments people typically live in; the automobile, workplace, and house, diminish the possibilities of insightful experience that are a part of life in either urban or rural settings. Suburbia, as a place between extremes, offers diluted opportunities for a richness in the quality of life. The architecture of the suburban condition needs to make places which allow both social interaction and truer connections to nature."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["Master of Architecture"]},{"key":"dc:format.medium","label":"Dc Format Medium","values":["BTD"]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Alternative suburban settlements"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.committeechair":["Brown, William W."],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Sarpaneva, Pia","Mashburn, Joseph L."],"dc:contributor.department":["Architecture"],"dc:creator":["DiMarco, Daniel Joseph"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2014-03-14T21:29:18Z"],"dc:date.available":["2014-03-14T21:29:18Z","2009-02-13"],"dc:date.issued":["1995-08-05"],"dc:description.abstract":["This Thesis begins with two premises. As architects: I. We assume responsibility for the built environment. II. We should perceive and address change in society. The focus is an exploration into possible solutions to the paradigm of the suburban settlement. 1995 The condition of life in suburbia is currently drifting away from the ever-changing reality of our culture. The strongly infused notion of a private dwelling amidst a green grass setting has been the normative goal of living for most of our society during its evolution, but particularly since WWII. Much of what is built in suburbia today is done through the inertia of habit. The suburbs continue to be built as if families were large and supported by one income; and as if land and energy were boundless. These conditions have led to patterns of growth which are dysfunctional. The vast land areas covered by this type of settlement require ever-expanding roadways, which in turn become less and less practical to those who live there. More time is devoured daily by getting from one place to another, through a landscape of built sameness. The controlled environments people typically live in; the automobile, workplace, and house, diminish the possibilities of insightful experience that are a part of life in either urban or rural settings. Suburbia, as a place between extremes, offers diluted opportunities for a richness in the quality of life. The architecture of the suburban condition needs to make places which allow both social interaction and truer connections to nature."],"dc:description.degree":["Master of Architecture"],"dc:format.medium":["BTD"],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.other":["etd-02132009-172258"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/41088"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:publisher":["Virginia Tech"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright"],"dc:rights.uri":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:subject":["built environment"],"dc:title":["Alternative suburban settlements"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.dcmitype":["Text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Architecture"],"thesis:degree_level":["masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Architecture"],"thesis:institution_name":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:20:32Z"}