Back to results

Virginia Tech

Computers in the design process: comparing creativity ratings of interior design solutions using pencil-based and computer-based design methods in schematic development

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

Computer-aided design has been integrated into the design process primarily in the latter stages as a drafting tool for detailing and accuracy rather than incorporated into the early stages as a design tool for enhancing ideational fluency. Pencil-based design (i.e., hand drawing and sketching) has traditionally been the graphic medium in the ideation process to aid in externalizing and manipulating designers' ideas. The early, creative design phases require the design medium that is used during schematic ideation yield to the deSigner's needs in generating, communicating, and evaluating ideas (Marshall, 1992). The integration of the computer-based method into schematic ideation may impact the design process by possibly affecting the designer's creative abilities and the resulting creative aspects of the design solution. This study examined the products of creativity to determine if differences exist in creativity ratings of design solutions generated using two design methods - pencil-based and computer-based - in the preliminary design phases. Interior design students (n=40) used the two design methods and generated design solutions for a small restaurant project. An established instrument was used by eight design educators to evaluate the design solutions on creathlity and six other design merit aspects. The process of creativity was also examined and the perceptions of the interior design students were assessed regarding the use of the deSign methods and the influences on creativity.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Ph. D.
Level thesis:degree_level
doctoral
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Housing, Interior Design, and Resource Management
Department dc:contributor.department
Housing, Interior Design, and Resource Management
Grantor dc:publisher
Virginia Tech
Year dc:date.issued
1994

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Brandon, Lynn
Chair dc:contributor.committeechair
  • McLain-Kark, Joan H.
Committee members dc:contributor.committeemember
  • Bowker, Jeanette E.
  • Lovingood, Rebecca P.
  • Beamish, Julia O.
  • Marshall-Baker, Anna
  • Jones, Dennis B.

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • In Copyright
Language dc:language.iso
en

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Dc Identifier Other
etd-10212005-122956
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/40058

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Virginia Tech
Base URL
vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
related terms
citation

Brandon, Lynn. Computers in the design process: comparing creativity ratings of interior design solutions using pencil-based and computer-based design methods in schematic development. doctoral thesis, Virginia Tech, 1994. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/40058