{"id":{"repo_id":"vt","oai_identifier":"oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/39840"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/vt/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/39840","repository":{"repo_id":"vt","name":"Virginia Tech","base_url":"https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Preconditioned conjugate gradient methods for the Navier-Stokes equations","abstract":"A generalized Conjugate Gradient like method is used to solve the linear systems of equations formed at each time-integration step of the unsteady, two-dimensional, compressible Navier-Stokes equations of fluid flow. The Navier-Stokes equations are cast in an implicit, upwind finite-volume, flux split formulation. Preconditioning techniques are employed with the Conjugate Gradient like method to enhance the stability and convergence rate of the overall iterative method. The superiority of the new solver is established by comparisons with a conventional Line GaussSeidel Relaxation (LGSR) solver. Comparisons are based on 'number of iterations required to converge to a steady-state solution' and 'total CPU time required for convergence'. Three test cases representing widely varying flow physics are chosen to investigate the performance of the solvers. Computational test results for very low speed (incompressible flow over a backward facing step at Mach 0.1), transonic flow (trailing edge flow in a transonic turbine cascade) and hypersonic flow (shockon- shock interactions on a cylindrical leading edge at Mach 6.0) are presented. For the 1vfach 0.1 case, speed-up factors of 30 (in terms of iterations) and 20 (in terms of CPU time) are found in favor of the new solver when compared with the LGSR solver. The corresponding speed-up factors for the transonic flow case are 20 and 18, respectively. The hypersonic case shows relatively lower speed-up factors of 5 and 4, respectively. This study reveals that preconditioning can greatly enhance the range of applicability and improve the performance of Conjugate Gradient like methods.","abstract_html":"A generalized Conjugate Gradient like method is used to solve the linear systems of equations formed at each time-integration step of the unsteady, two-dimensional, compressible Navier-Stokes equations of fluid flow. The Navier-Stokes equations are cast in an implicit, upwind finite-volume, flux split formulation. Preconditioning techniques are employed with the Conjugate Gradient like method to enhance the stability and convergence rate of the overall iterative method. The superiority of the new solver is established by comparisons with a conventional Line GaussSeidel Relaxation (LGSR) solver. Comparisons are based on 'number of iterations required to converge to a steady-state solution' and 'total CPU time required for convergence'. Three test cases representing widely varying flow physics are chosen to investigate the performance of the solvers. Computational test results for very low speed (incompressible flow over a backward facing step at Mach 0.1), transonic flow (trailing edge flow in a transonic turbine cascade) and hypersonic flow (shockon- shock interactions on a cylindrical leading edge at Mach 6.0) are presented. For the 1vfach 0.1 case, speed-up factors of 30 (in terms of iterations) and 20 (in terms of CPU time) are found in favor of the new solver when compared with the LGSR solver. The corresponding speed-up factors for the transonic flow case are 20 and 18, respectively. The hypersonic case shows relatively lower speed-up factors of 5 and 4, respectively. This study reveals that preconditioning can greatly enhance the range of applicability and improve the performance of Conjugate Gradient like methods.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Ajmani, Kumud"],"institution":"Virginia Tech","degree_name":"Ph. D.","degree_level":"doctoral","degree_discipline":"Mechanical Engineering","degree_department":"Mechanical Engineering","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":["Ng, Fai"],"committee_members":["Moses, Hal L.","Nelson, Douglas J.","Ribbens, Calvin J.","Vick, Brian L."],"year":1991,"date_issued":"1991-11-03","date_published":"1991-11-03","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:19:22Z","subjects":[],"languages":["en"],"rights":["In Copyright"],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-10132005-152548"],"render_values":[{"text":"etd-10132005-152548","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10919/39840","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.committeechair","label":"Committee Chair","values":["Ng, Fai"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Moses, Hal L.","Nelson, Douglas J.","Ribbens, Calvin J.","Vick, Brian L."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Mechanical Engineering"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Ajmani, Kumud"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2014-03-14T21:21:09Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2014-03-14T21:21:09Z","2005-10-13"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["1991-11-03"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Virginia Tech"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"dc:type.dcmitype","label":"Dc Type Dcmitype","values":["Text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Mechanical Engineering"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["doctoral"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph. D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright"]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-10132005-152548"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/39840"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["A generalized Conjugate Gradient like method is used to solve the linear systems of equations formed at each time-integration step of the unsteady, two-dimensional, compressible Navier-Stokes equations of fluid flow. The Navier-Stokes equations are cast in an implicit, upwind finite-volume, flux split formulation. Preconditioning techniques are employed with the Conjugate Gradient like method to enhance the stability and convergence rate of the overall iterative method. The superiority of the new solver is established by comparisons with a conventional Line GaussSeidel Relaxation (LGSR) solver. Comparisons are based on 'number of iterations required to converge to a steady-state solution' and 'total CPU time required for convergence'. Three test cases representing widely varying flow physics are chosen to investigate the performance of the solvers. Computational test results for very low speed (incompressible flow over a backward facing step at Mach 0.1), transonic flow (trailing edge flow in a transonic turbine cascade) and hypersonic flow (shockon- shock interactions on a cylindrical leading edge at Mach 6.0) are presented. For the 1vfach 0.1 case, speed-up factors of 30 (in terms of iterations) and 20 (in terms of CPU time) are found in favor of the new solver when compared with the LGSR solver. The corresponding speed-up factors for the transonic flow case are 20 and 18, respectively. The hypersonic case shows relatively lower speed-up factors of 5 and 4, respectively. This study reveals that preconditioning can greatly enhance the range of applicability and improve the performance of Conjugate Gradient like methods."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["Ph. D."]},{"key":"dc:format.medium","label":"Dc Format Medium","values":["BTD"]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Preconditioned conjugate gradient methods for the Navier-Stokes equations"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.committeechair":["Ng, Fai"],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Moses, Hal L.","Nelson, Douglas J.","Ribbens, Calvin J.","Vick, Brian L."],"dc:contributor.department":["Mechanical Engineering"],"dc:creator":["Ajmani, Kumud"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2014-03-14T21:21:09Z"],"dc:date.available":["2014-03-14T21:21:09Z","2005-10-13"],"dc:date.issued":["1991-11-03"],"dc:description.abstract":["A generalized Conjugate Gradient like method is used to solve the linear systems of equations formed at each time-integration step of the unsteady, two-dimensional, compressible Navier-Stokes equations of fluid flow. The Navier-Stokes equations are cast in an implicit, upwind finite-volume, flux split formulation. Preconditioning techniques are employed with the Conjugate Gradient like method to enhance the stability and convergence rate of the overall iterative method. The superiority of the new solver is established by comparisons with a conventional Line GaussSeidel Relaxation (LGSR) solver. Comparisons are based on 'number of iterations required to converge to a steady-state solution' and 'total CPU time required for convergence'. Three test cases representing widely varying flow physics are chosen to investigate the performance of the solvers. Computational test results for very low speed (incompressible flow over a backward facing step at Mach 0.1), transonic flow (trailing edge flow in a transonic turbine cascade) and hypersonic flow (shockon- shock interactions on a cylindrical leading edge at Mach 6.0) are presented. For the 1vfach 0.1 case, speed-up factors of 30 (in terms of iterations) and 20 (in terms of CPU time) are found in favor of the new solver when compared with the LGSR solver. The corresponding speed-up factors for the transonic flow case are 20 and 18, respectively. The hypersonic case shows relatively lower speed-up factors of 5 and 4, respectively. This study reveals that preconditioning can greatly enhance the range of applicability and improve the performance of Conjugate Gradient like methods."],"dc:description.degree":["Ph. D."],"dc:format.medium":["BTD"],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.other":["etd-10132005-152548"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/39840"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:publisher":["Virginia Tech"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright"],"dc:rights.uri":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:title":["Preconditioned conjugate gradient methods for the Navier-Stokes equations"],"dc:type":["Dissertation"],"dc:type.dcmitype":["Text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Mechanical Engineering"],"thesis:degree_level":["doctoral"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph. D."],"thesis:institution_name":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:19:22Z"}