{"id":{"repo_id":"vt","oai_identifier":"oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/36763"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/vt/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/36763","repository":{"repo_id":"vt","name":"Virginia Tech","base_url":"https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Elevation Effects on GPS Positional Accuracy","abstract":"Data from a Coarse Acquisition (C/A) Global Positing System (GPS) map-grade receiver were evaluated to assess the accuracy of differentially corrected points. Many studies have focused on the accuracy of GPS units under ideal data collection conditions. Ideal conditions allow the collection of data with four satellites (3D mode), yet field data conditions are often less than ideal. Four satellites may not always be in view because of mountainous topography, heavy forest cover, or other obstructions which block satellite signals from the receiver. This study examines GPS accuracy when four satellites are not available, instead collecting data with only three satellites (2D mode). 3D GPS points compute four unknowns: x, y , z, and clock error. In comparison, 2D GPS points are less accurate as only three unknowns are calculated: x, y, and clock error. Elevation (or z) is not computed for 2D points, causing increased error in the horizontal (x, y) measurement. The effect of elevation was evaluated on 234 2D GPS data points. These points were collected and corrected at elevation intervals of true elevation, +-25 meters, +- 50 meters, and +-75 meters. These 2D points were then compared to surveyed points to measure the effect vertical error has on horizontal accuracy. In general, the more error in the vertical estimate during correction, the greater the horizontal error.","abstract_html":"Data from a Coarse Acquisition (C/A) Global Positing System (GPS) map-grade receiver were evaluated to assess the accuracy of differentially corrected points. Many studies have focused on the accuracy of GPS units under ideal data collection conditions. Ideal conditions allow the collection of data with four satellites (3D mode), yet field data conditions are often less than ideal. Four satellites may not always be in view because of mountainous topography, heavy forest cover, or other obstructions which block satellite signals from the receiver. This study examines GPS accuracy when four satellites are not available, instead collecting data with only three satellites (2D mode). 3D GPS points compute four unknowns: x, y , z, and clock error. In comparison, 2D GPS points are less accurate as only three unknowns are calculated: x, y, and clock error. Elevation (or z) is not computed for 2D points, causing increased error in the horizontal (x, y) measurement. The effect of elevation was evaluated on 234 2D GPS data points. These points were collected and corrected at elevation intervals of true elevation, +-25 meters, +- 50 meters, and +-75 meters. These 2D points were then compared to surveyed points to measure the effect vertical error has on horizontal accuracy. In general, the more error in the vertical estimate during correction, the greater the horizontal error.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Heselton, Robert Reid"],"institution":"Virginia Tech","degree_name":"Master of Science","degree_level":"masters","degree_discipline":"Geography","degree_department":"Geography","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":["Carstensen, Laurence W."],"committee_members":["Oderwald, Richard G.","Campbell, James B. Jr."],"year":1998,"date_issued":"1998-06-05","date_published":"1998-06-05","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:20:02Z","subjects":["Global Positioning System","GPS","2D","Accuracy"],"languages":[],"rights":["In Copyright"],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-51198-162850"],"render_values":[{"text":"etd-51198-162850","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10919/36763","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.committeechair","label":"Committee Chair","values":["Carstensen, Laurence W."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Oderwald, Richard G.","Campbell, James B. Jr."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Geography"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Heselton, Robert Reid"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2014-03-14T20:51:44Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2014-03-14T20:51:44Z","1999-06-12"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["1998-06-05"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Virginia Tech"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Geography"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Global Positioning System","GPS","2D","Accuracy"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright"]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-51198-162850"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/36763"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Data from a Coarse Acquisition (C/A) Global Positing System (GPS) map-grade receiver were evaluated to assess the accuracy of differentially corrected points. Many studies have focused on the accuracy of GPS units under ideal data collection conditions. Ideal conditions allow the collection of data with four satellites (3D mode), yet field data conditions are often less than ideal. Four satellites may not always be in view because of mountainous topography, heavy forest cover, or other obstructions which block satellite signals from the receiver. This study examines GPS accuracy when four satellites are not available, instead collecting data with only three satellites (2D mode). 3D GPS points compute four unknowns: x, y , z, and clock error. In comparison, 2D GPS points are less accurate as only three unknowns are calculated: x, y, and clock error. Elevation (or z) is not computed for 2D points, causing increased error in the horizontal (x, y) measurement. The effect of elevation was evaluated on 234 2D GPS data points. These points were collected and corrected at elevation intervals of true elevation, +-25 meters, +- 50 meters, and +-75 meters. These 2D points were then compared to surveyed points to measure the effect vertical error has on horizontal accuracy. In general, the more error in the vertical estimate during correction, the greater the horizontal error."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["Master of Science"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Elevation Effects on GPS Positional Accuracy"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.committeechair":["Carstensen, Laurence W."],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Oderwald, Richard G.","Campbell, James B. Jr."],"dc:contributor.department":["Geography"],"dc:creator":["Heselton, Robert Reid"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2014-03-14T20:51:44Z"],"dc:date.available":["2014-03-14T20:51:44Z","1999-06-12"],"dc:date.issued":["1998-06-05"],"dc:description.abstract":["Data from a Coarse Acquisition (C/A) Global Positing System (GPS) map-grade receiver were evaluated to assess the accuracy of differentially corrected points. Many studies have focused on the accuracy of GPS units under ideal data collection conditions. Ideal conditions allow the collection of data with four satellites (3D mode), yet field data conditions are often less than ideal. Four satellites may not always be in view because of mountainous topography, heavy forest cover, or other obstructions which block satellite signals from the receiver. This study examines GPS accuracy when four satellites are not available, instead collecting data with only three satellites (2D mode). 3D GPS points compute four unknowns: x, y , z, and clock error. In comparison, 2D GPS points are less accurate as only three unknowns are calculated: x, y, and clock error. Elevation (or z) is not computed for 2D points, causing increased error in the horizontal (x, y) measurement. The effect of elevation was evaluated on 234 2D GPS data points. These points were collected and corrected at elevation intervals of true elevation, +-25 meters, +- 50 meters, and +-75 meters. These 2D points were then compared to surveyed points to measure the effect vertical error has on horizontal accuracy. In general, the more error in the vertical estimate during correction, the greater the horizontal error."],"dc:description.degree":["Master of Science"],"dc:identifier.other":["etd-51198-162850"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/36763"],"dc:publisher":["Virginia Tech"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright"],"dc:rights.uri":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:subject":["Global Positioning System","GPS","2D","Accuracy"],"dc:title":["Elevation Effects on GPS Positional Accuracy"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Geography"],"thesis:degree_level":["masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science"],"thesis:institution_name":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:20:02Z"}