{"id":{"repo_id":"vt","oai_identifier":"oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/29399"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/vt/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/29399","repository":{"repo_id":"vt","name":"Virginia Tech","base_url":"https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Field Performance of Epoxy-Coated Reinforcing Steel in Virginia Bridge Decks","abstract":"The corrosion protection performance of epoxy-coated reinforcing steel (ECR) was evaluated in 18 concrete bridge decks in Virginia in 1997. The decks were 2 to 20 years old at the time of the investigation. The concrete bridge deck inspections included crack survey and cover depth determination in the right traffic lane. Maximum of 12 cores with the top reinforcement randomly located in the lowest 12th percentile cover depth and 3 cores with the truss bars were drilled from each bridge deck. The concrete core evaluation included visual examination and determination of carbonation depth, moisture content, absorption, percent saturation and chloride content at 13 mm depth. Rapid chloride permeability test was also performed for the surface and base concrete on samples obtained from cores containing truss bars. The ECR inspection consisted of visual examination and damage evaluation, coating thickness and adhesion determination. The condition of the steel underneath the epoxy coating was also evaluated. Adhesion loss of the epoxy coating to the steel surface was detected for 4 years old bridge decks. The epoxy coating had debonded from the reinforcing bar before the chloride arrival. Visible signs of a possibility of a corrosion process underneath the coating suggest that ECR will not provide any or little additional service life for concrete bridge decks in comparison to black steel. Other systems, which will provide longer protection with a higher degree of reliability against chloride induced corrosion of steel in concrete, should be considered.","abstract_html":"The corrosion protection performance of epoxy-coated reinforcing steel (ECR) was evaluated in 18 concrete bridge decks in Virginia in 1997. The decks were 2 to 20 years old at the time of the investigation. The concrete bridge deck inspections included crack survey and cover depth determination in the right traffic lane. Maximum of 12 cores with the top reinforcement randomly located in the lowest 12th percentile cover depth and 3 cores with the truss bars were drilled from each bridge deck. The concrete core evaluation included visual examination and determination of carbonation depth, moisture content, absorption, percent saturation and chloride content at 13 mm depth. Rapid chloride permeability test was also performed for the surface and base concrete on samples obtained from cores containing truss bars. The ECR inspection consisted of visual examination and damage evaluation, coating thickness and adhesion determination. The condition of the steel underneath the epoxy coating was also evaluated. Adhesion loss of the epoxy coating to the steel surface was detected for 4 years old bridge decks. The epoxy coating had debonded from the reinforcing bar before the chloride arrival. Visible signs of a possibility of a corrosion process underneath the coating suggest that ECR will not provide any or little additional service life for concrete bridge decks in comparison to black steel. Other systems, which will provide longer protection with a higher degree of reliability against chloride induced corrosion of steel in concrete, should be considered.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Pyc, Wioleta A."],"institution":"Virginia Tech","degree_name":"Ph. D.","degree_level":"doctoral","degree_discipline":"Civil Engineering","degree_department":"Civil Engineering","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":["Weyers, Richard E."],"committee_members":["Dillard, John G.","Sprinkel, Michael M.","Wightman, James P.","Duke, John C. Jr.","Cousins, Thomas E."],"year":1998,"date_issued":"1998-09-04","date_published":"1998-09-04","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:20:32Z","subjects":["adhesion","concrete","bridge decks","epoxy-coated reinforcement (ECR)"],"languages":[],"rights":["In Copyright"],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-102998-190256"],"render_values":[{"text":"etd-102998-190256","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10919/29399","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.committeechair","label":"Committee Chair","values":["Weyers, Richard E."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Dillard, John G.","Sprinkel, Michael M.","Wightman, James P.","Duke, John C. Jr.","Cousins, Thomas E."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Civil Engineering"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Pyc, Wioleta A."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2014-03-14T20:17:46Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2014-03-14T20:17:46Z","1998-02-11"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["1998-09-04"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Virginia Tech"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Civil Engineering"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["doctoral"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph. D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["adhesion","concrete","bridge decks","epoxy-coated reinforcement (ECR)"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright"]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-102998-190256"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/29399"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The corrosion protection performance of epoxy-coated reinforcing steel (ECR) was evaluated in 18 concrete bridge decks in Virginia in 1997. The decks were 2 to 20 years old at the time of the investigation. The concrete bridge deck inspections included crack survey and cover depth determination in the right traffic lane. Maximum of 12 cores with the top reinforcement randomly located in the lowest 12th percentile cover depth and 3 cores with the truss bars were drilled from each bridge deck. The concrete core evaluation included visual examination and determination of carbonation depth, moisture content, absorption, percent saturation and chloride content at 13 mm depth. Rapid chloride permeability test was also performed for the surface and base concrete on samples obtained from cores containing truss bars. The ECR inspection consisted of visual examination and damage evaluation, coating thickness and adhesion determination. The condition of the steel underneath the epoxy coating was also evaluated. Adhesion loss of the epoxy coating to the steel surface was detected for 4 years old bridge decks. The epoxy coating had debonded from the reinforcing bar before the chloride arrival. Visible signs of a possibility of a corrosion process underneath the coating suggest that ECR will not provide any or little additional service life for concrete bridge decks in comparison to black steel. Other systems, which will provide longer protection with a higher degree of reliability against chloride induced corrosion of steel in concrete, should be considered."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["Ph. D."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Field Performance of Epoxy-Coated Reinforcing Steel in Virginia Bridge Decks"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.committeechair":["Weyers, Richard E."],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Dillard, John G.","Sprinkel, Michael M.","Wightman, James P.","Duke, John C. Jr.","Cousins, Thomas E."],"dc:contributor.department":["Civil Engineering"],"dc:creator":["Pyc, Wioleta A."],"dc:date.accessioned":["2014-03-14T20:17:46Z"],"dc:date.available":["2014-03-14T20:17:46Z","1998-02-11"],"dc:date.issued":["1998-09-04"],"dc:description.abstract":["The corrosion protection performance of epoxy-coated reinforcing steel (ECR) was evaluated in 18 concrete bridge decks in Virginia in 1997. The decks were 2 to 20 years old at the time of the investigation. The concrete bridge deck inspections included crack survey and cover depth determination in the right traffic lane. Maximum of 12 cores with the top reinforcement randomly located in the lowest 12th percentile cover depth and 3 cores with the truss bars were drilled from each bridge deck. The concrete core evaluation included visual examination and determination of carbonation depth, moisture content, absorption, percent saturation and chloride content at 13 mm depth. Rapid chloride permeability test was also performed for the surface and base concrete on samples obtained from cores containing truss bars. The ECR inspection consisted of visual examination and damage evaluation, coating thickness and adhesion determination. The condition of the steel underneath the epoxy coating was also evaluated. Adhesion loss of the epoxy coating to the steel surface was detected for 4 years old bridge decks. The epoxy coating had debonded from the reinforcing bar before the chloride arrival. Visible signs of a possibility of a corrosion process underneath the coating suggest that ECR will not provide any or little additional service life for concrete bridge decks in comparison to black steel. Other systems, which will provide longer protection with a higher degree of reliability against chloride induced corrosion of steel in concrete, should be considered."],"dc:description.degree":["Ph. D."],"dc:identifier.other":["etd-102998-190256"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/29399"],"dc:publisher":["Virginia Tech"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright"],"dc:rights.uri":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:subject":["adhesion","concrete","bridge decks","epoxy-coated reinforcement (ECR)"],"dc:title":["Field Performance of Epoxy-Coated Reinforcing Steel in Virginia Bridge Decks"],"dc:type":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Civil Engineering"],"thesis:degree_level":["doctoral"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph. D."],"thesis:institution_name":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:20:32Z"}