{"id":{"repo_id":"vt","oai_identifier":"oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/28293"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/vt/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/28293","repository":{"repo_id":"vt","name":"Virginia Tech","base_url":"https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Reliability and Validity of Mechanical Response Tissue Analysis in Composite and Human Tibiae","abstract":"The purpose of this study was to assess the validity, as well as to test novel approaches to improving the reliability, of mechanical response tissue analysis (MRTA). Twenty composite tibiae underwent MRTA testing on three separate days to determine intra- and inter-day reliability of bending stiffness. The bones were then subjected to three-point bending tests to directly determine elastic modulus. Within- and between-day reliability of tibial bending stiffness with MRTA was moderate (CV = 24%) and poor (CV = 74%), respectively. No relationship was observed between the two testing methods due to the wide variation in tibial bending stiffness values with MRTA. The second part of the study sought to determine within- and between-day reliability of MRTA in young women with the current testing protocol and compare the results with those from newly-designed protocols. Twelve women (23 ± 2 yr, 162 ± 7 cm, 57 ± 7kg, 19 ± 4 % fat) were tested for tibial bending stiffness with MRTA over 5 days. The current protocol was compared to protocols where day-to-day subject positioning was quantified, subjects were tested in a supine position, and various bending stiffness prediction models were used. Within- (CV = 20%) and between-day (CV = 19%) reliability of tibial bending stiffness with MRTA was moderate using the original methodology. Modifications to this protocol either resulted in similar or worse reliability.","abstract_html":"The purpose of this study was to assess the validity, as well as to test novel approaches to improving the reliability, of mechanical response tissue analysis (MRTA). Twenty composite tibiae underwent MRTA testing on three separate days to determine intra- and inter-day reliability of bending stiffness. The bones were then subjected to three-point bending tests to directly determine elastic modulus. Within- and between-day reliability of tibial bending stiffness with MRTA was moderate (CV = 24%) and poor (CV = 74%), respectively. No relationship was observed between the two testing methods due to the wide variation in tibial bending stiffness values with MRTA. The second part of the study sought to determine within- and between-day reliability of MRTA in young women with the current testing protocol and compare the results with those from newly-designed protocols. Twelve women (23 ± 2 yr, 162 ± 7 cm, 57 ± 7kg, 19 ± 4 % fat) were tested for tibial bending stiffness with MRTA over 5 days. The current protocol was compared to protocols where day-to-day subject positioning was quantified, subjects were tested in a supine position, and various bending stiffness prediction models were used. Within- (CV = 20%) and between-day (CV = 19%) reliability of tibial bending stiffness with MRTA was moderate using the original methodology. Modifications to this protocol either resulted in similar or worse reliability.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Miller, Larry Edwin"],"institution":"Virginia Tech","degree_name":"Ph. D.","degree_level":"doctoral","degree_discipline":"Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise","degree_department":"Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":["Herbert, William G."],"committee_members":["Cross, Lawrence H.","Nickols-Richardson, Sharon M.","Gwazdauskas, Francis C.","Ramp, Warren K."],"year":2003,"date_issued":"2003-07-08","date_published":"2003-07-08","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:20:27Z","subjects":["tibia","reliability","stiffness","validity","mechanical response tissue analysis"],"languages":[],"rights":["In Copyright"],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-07142003-172355"],"render_values":[{"text":"etd-07142003-172355","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10919/28293","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.committeechair","label":"Committee Chair","values":["Herbert, William G."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Cross, Lawrence H.","Nickols-Richardson, Sharon M.","Gwazdauskas, Francis C.","Ramp, Warren K."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Miller, Larry Edwin"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2014-03-14T20:14:01Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2014-03-14T20:14:01Z","2004-07-22"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2003-07-08"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Virginia Tech"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["doctoral"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph. D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["tibia","reliability","stiffness","validity","mechanical response tissue analysis"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright"]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-07142003-172355"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/28293"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The purpose of this study was to assess the validity, as well as to test novel approaches to improving the reliability, of mechanical response tissue analysis (MRTA). Twenty composite tibiae underwent MRTA testing on three separate days to determine intra- and inter-day reliability of bending stiffness. The bones were then subjected to three-point bending tests to directly determine elastic modulus. Within- and between-day reliability of tibial bending stiffness with MRTA was moderate (CV = 24%) and poor (CV = 74%), respectively. No relationship was observed between the two testing methods due to the wide variation in tibial bending stiffness values with MRTA. The second part of the study sought to determine within- and between-day reliability of MRTA in young women with the current testing protocol and compare the results with those from newly-designed protocols. Twelve women (23 ± 2 yr, 162 ± 7 cm, 57 ± 7kg, 19 ± 4 % fat) were tested for tibial bending stiffness with MRTA over 5 days. The current protocol was compared to protocols where day-to-day subject positioning was quantified, subjects were tested in a supine position, and various bending stiffness prediction models were used. Within- (CV = 20%) and between-day (CV = 19%) reliability of tibial bending stiffness with MRTA was moderate using the original methodology. Modifications to this protocol either resulted in similar or worse reliability."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["Ph. D."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Reliability and Validity of Mechanical Response Tissue Analysis in Composite and Human Tibiae"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.committeechair":["Herbert, William G."],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Cross, Lawrence H.","Nickols-Richardson, Sharon M.","Gwazdauskas, Francis C.","Ramp, Warren K."],"dc:contributor.department":["Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise"],"dc:creator":["Miller, Larry Edwin"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2014-03-14T20:14:01Z"],"dc:date.available":["2014-03-14T20:14:01Z","2004-07-22"],"dc:date.issued":["2003-07-08"],"dc:description.abstract":["The purpose of this study was to assess the validity, as well as to test novel approaches to improving the reliability, of mechanical response tissue analysis (MRTA). Twenty composite tibiae underwent MRTA testing on three separate days to determine intra- and inter-day reliability of bending stiffness. The bones were then subjected to three-point bending tests to directly determine elastic modulus. Within- and between-day reliability of tibial bending stiffness with MRTA was moderate (CV = 24%) and poor (CV = 74%), respectively. No relationship was observed between the two testing methods due to the wide variation in tibial bending stiffness values with MRTA. The second part of the study sought to determine within- and between-day reliability of MRTA in young women with the current testing protocol and compare the results with those from newly-designed protocols. Twelve women (23 ± 2 yr, 162 ± 7 cm, 57 ± 7kg, 19 ± 4 % fat) were tested for tibial bending stiffness with MRTA over 5 days. The current protocol was compared to protocols where day-to-day subject positioning was quantified, subjects were tested in a supine position, and various bending stiffness prediction models were used. Within- (CV = 20%) and between-day (CV = 19%) reliability of tibial bending stiffness with MRTA was moderate using the original methodology. Modifications to this protocol either resulted in similar or worse reliability."],"dc:description.degree":["Ph. D."],"dc:identifier.other":["etd-07142003-172355"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/28293"],"dc:publisher":["Virginia Tech"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright"],"dc:rights.uri":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:subject":["tibia","reliability","stiffness","validity","mechanical response tissue analysis"],"dc:title":["Reliability and Validity of Mechanical Response Tissue Analysis in Composite and Human Tibiae"],"dc:type":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise"],"thesis:degree_level":["doctoral"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph. D."],"thesis:institution_name":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:20:27Z"}