{"id":{"repo_id":"vt","oai_identifier":"oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/26363"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/vt/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/26363","repository":{"repo_id":"vt","name":"Virginia Tech","base_url":"https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"The Central Bankers: Administrative Legitimacy and the Federal Reserve System","abstract":"In this dissertation, I study the legitimacy of the Federal Reserve System. Administrative legitimacy, I argue, is an evaluative (or subjective) concept consisting of two beliefs: first, administrative institutions have a right to govern; second, they are an appropriate way to handle public tasks. After discussing scholarship on legitimacy, I examine the Federal Reserve System, asking two questions about it. First, how have its officials attempted to legitimate both their institution and their actions over time? Second, how have elected officials, scholars, and political activists attempted to (de)legitimate the Fed and its officials' actions? While answering my research questions, I tell a story about which strategies the institution's supporters have used to legitimate the Fed and which strategies the institution's opponents have used to delegitimate it. To do so, I examine two things: the public argument about the Fed's administrative legitimacy from 1970 to 1995; the Fed's interactions with its environment, those with direct implications for its legitimacy, during this time.","abstract_html":"In this dissertation, I study the legitimacy of the Federal Reserve System. Administrative legitimacy, I argue, is an evaluative (or subjective) concept consisting of two beliefs: first, administrative institutions have a right to govern; second, they are an appropriate way to handle public tasks. After discussing scholarship on legitimacy, I examine the Federal Reserve System, asking two questions about it. First, how have its officials attempted to legitimate both their institution and their actions over time? Second, how have elected officials, scholars, and political activists attempted to (de)legitimate the Fed and its officials' actions? While answering my research questions, I tell a story about which strategies the institution's supporters have used to legitimate the Fed and which strategies the institution's opponents have used to delegitimate it. To do so, I examine two things: the public argument about the Fed's administrative legitimacy from 1970 to 1995; the Fed's interactions with its environment, those with direct implications for its legitimacy, during this time.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Mitchell, Joseph Pershing"],"institution":"Virginia Tech","degree_name":"Ph. D.","degree_level":"doctoral","degree_discipline":"Public Administration and Public Affairs","degree_department":"Public Administration and Public Affairs","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":["Rohr, John A."],"committee_members":["White, Orion F. Jr.","Wamsley, Gary L.","Dudley, Larkin S.","Rees, Joseph V."],"year":2000,"date_issued":"2000-02-25","date_published":"2000-02-25","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:20:35Z","subjects":["Central Banks","Administrative Agencies","Governance"],"languages":[],"rights":["In Copyright"],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-0305100-180653"],"render_values":[{"text":"etd-0305100-180653","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10919/26363","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.committeechair","label":"Committee Chair","values":["Rohr, John A."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["White, Orion F. Jr.","Wamsley, Gary L.","Dudley, Larkin S.","Rees, Joseph V."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Public Administration and Public Affairs"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Mitchell, Joseph Pershing"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2014-03-14T20:07:59Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2014-03-14T20:07:59Z","2001-04-11"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2000-02-25"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Virginia Tech"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Public Administration and Public Affairs"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["doctoral"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph. D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Central Banks","Administrative Agencies","Governance"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright"]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["etd-0305100-180653"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/26363"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["In this dissertation, I study the legitimacy of the Federal Reserve System. Administrative legitimacy, I argue, is an evaluative (or subjective) concept consisting of two beliefs: first, administrative institutions have a right to govern; second, they are an appropriate way to handle public tasks. After discussing scholarship on legitimacy, I examine the Federal Reserve System, asking two questions about it. First, how have its officials attempted to legitimate both their institution and their actions over time? Second, how have elected officials, scholars, and political activists attempted to (de)legitimate the Fed and its officials' actions? While answering my research questions, I tell a story about which strategies the institution's supporters have used to legitimate the Fed and which strategies the institution's opponents have used to delegitimate it. To do so, I examine two things: the public argument about the Fed's administrative legitimacy from 1970 to 1995; the Fed's interactions with its environment, those with direct implications for its legitimacy, during this time."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["Ph. D."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Central Bankers: Administrative Legitimacy and the Federal Reserve System"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.committeechair":["Rohr, John A."],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["White, Orion F. Jr.","Wamsley, Gary L.","Dudley, Larkin S.","Rees, Joseph V."],"dc:contributor.department":["Public Administration and Public Affairs"],"dc:creator":["Mitchell, Joseph Pershing"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2014-03-14T20:07:59Z"],"dc:date.available":["2014-03-14T20:07:59Z","2001-04-11"],"dc:date.issued":["2000-02-25"],"dc:description.abstract":["In this dissertation, I study the legitimacy of the Federal Reserve System. Administrative legitimacy, I argue, is an evaluative (or subjective) concept consisting of two beliefs: first, administrative institutions have a right to govern; second, they are an appropriate way to handle public tasks. After discussing scholarship on legitimacy, I examine the Federal Reserve System, asking two questions about it. First, how have its officials attempted to legitimate both their institution and their actions over time? Second, how have elected officials, scholars, and political activists attempted to (de)legitimate the Fed and its officials' actions? While answering my research questions, I tell a story about which strategies the institution's supporters have used to legitimate the Fed and which strategies the institution's opponents have used to delegitimate it. To do so, I examine two things: the public argument about the Fed's administrative legitimacy from 1970 to 1995; the Fed's interactions with its environment, those with direct implications for its legitimacy, during this time."],"dc:description.degree":["Ph. D."],"dc:identifier.other":["etd-0305100-180653"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/26363"],"dc:publisher":["Virginia Tech"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright"],"dc:rights.uri":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:subject":["Central Banks","Administrative Agencies","Governance"],"dc:title":["The Central Bankers: Administrative Legitimacy and the Federal Reserve System"],"dc:type":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Public Administration and Public Affairs"],"thesis:degree_level":["doctoral"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph. D."],"thesis:institution_name":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:20:35Z"}