{"id":{"repo_id":"vt","oai_identifier":"oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/23228"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/vt/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/23228","repository":{"repo_id":"vt","name":"Virginia Tech","base_url":"https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Cultivating Agricultural Resistance: Alternative Farming as Slow Modernity","abstract":"Contemporary methods of food production in the United States have become undeniably destructive ecologically. Two of the strongest symbols of that destruction from corporate industrial agriculture are CAFOs (Confined Animal Feeding Operations) and monoculture crop production. This thesis seeks to find examples of producers refusing these methods as well as what motivates those producers to refuse, and what that refuse could mean politically. The project is grounded theoretically in the work of critical theorists, especially Herbert Marcuse, because the Frankfurt School\\'s criticism of instrumental rationality and understanding of domination functions to elucidate the societal conditions that allow for agricultural (over)production to be swept up in problematic methods in the name of efficiency. Part I starts by analyzing academic as well as popular discourses of CAFOs and the historical process of industrializing meat production and agriculture in the United States. Here both corporate capitalism and enlightenment rationality are indicted and Marcuse\\'s theories are put to work to set up what is being refused. Part II uses examples of organic and local food to provide an understanding for how consumption centered refusals can be co-opted by corporate interest. Part III seeks out contemporary refusals that go past \\'green consumerism\\' and foster a \"new sensibility\" that is grounded in a sense of place, ecological cooperation with nature, and refuses corporatism. In this new sensibility there is a direct rejection of the instrumental rationality, the profit motive and exploitation of nature.","abstract_html":"Contemporary methods of food production in the United States have become undeniably destructive ecologically. Two of the strongest symbols of that destruction from corporate industrial agriculture are CAFOs (Confined Animal Feeding Operations) and monoculture crop production. This thesis seeks to find examples of producers refusing these methods as well as what motivates those producers to refuse, and what that refuse could mean politically. The project is grounded theoretically in the work of critical theorists, especially Herbert Marcuse, because the Frankfurt School\\'s criticism of instrumental rationality and understanding of domination functions to elucidate the societal conditions that allow for agricultural (over)production to be swept up in problematic methods in the name of efficiency. Part I starts by analyzing academic as well as popular discourses of CAFOs and the historical process of industrializing meat production and agriculture in the United States. Here both corporate capitalism and enlightenment rationality are indicted and Marcuse\\'s theories are put to work to set up what is being refused. Part II uses examples of organic and local food to provide an understanding for how consumption centered refusals can be co-opted by corporate interest. Part III seeks out contemporary refusals that go past \\'green consumerism\\' and foster a "new sensibility" that is grounded in a sense of place, ecological cooperation with nature, and refuses corporatism. In this new sensibility there is a direct rejection of the instrumental rationality, the profit motive and exploitation of nature.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Abbott, Bryce Alexander"],"institution":"Virginia Tech","degree_name":"Master of Public and International Affairs","degree_level":"masters","degree_discipline":"Public and International Affairs","degree_department":"Public and International Affairs","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":["Rothschild, Joyce"],"committee_members":["Luke, Timothy W.","Nickel, Patricia Michelle"],"year":2013,"date_issued":"2013-06-14","date_published":"2013-06-14","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:18:39Z","subjects":["Critical Theory","Capitalism","Agriculture"],"languages":[],"rights":["In Copyright"],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["vt_gsexam:1191"],"render_values":[{"text":"vt_gsexam:1191","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10919/23228","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.committeechair","label":"Committee Chair","values":["Rothschild, Joyce"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Luke, Timothy W.","Nickel, Patricia Michelle"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Public and International Affairs"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Abbott, Bryce Alexander"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2013-06-15T08:00:29Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2013-06-15T08:00:29Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2013-06-14"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Virginia Tech"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Public and International Affairs"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Public and International Affairs"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Critical Theory","Capitalism","Agriculture"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright"]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["vt_gsexam:1191"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/23228"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Contemporary methods of food production in the United States have become undeniably destructive ecologically. Two of the strongest symbols of that destruction from corporate industrial agriculture are CAFOs (Confined Animal Feeding Operations) and monoculture crop production. This thesis seeks to find examples of producers refusing these methods as well as what motivates those producers to refuse, and what that refuse could mean politically. The project is grounded theoretically in the work of critical theorists, especially Herbert Marcuse, because the Frankfurt School\\'s criticism of instrumental rationality and understanding of domination functions to elucidate the societal conditions that allow for agricultural (over)production to be swept up in problematic methods in the name of efficiency. Part I starts by analyzing academic as well as popular discourses of CAFOs and the historical process of industrializing meat production and agriculture in the United States. Here both corporate capitalism and enlightenment rationality are indicted and Marcuse\\'s theories are put to work to set up what is being refused. Part II uses examples of organic and local food to provide an understanding for how consumption centered refusals can be co-opted by corporate interest. Part III seeks out contemporary refusals that go past \\'green consumerism\\' and foster a \"new sensibility\" that is grounded in a sense of place, ecological cooperation with nature, and refuses corporatism. In this new sensibility there is a direct rejection of the instrumental rationality, the profit motive and exploitation of nature."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["Master of Public and International Affairs"]},{"key":"dc:format.medium","label":"Dc Format Medium","values":["ETD"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Cultivating Agricultural Resistance: Alternative Farming as Slow Modernity"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.committeechair":["Rothschild, Joyce"],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Luke, Timothy W.","Nickel, Patricia Michelle"],"dc:contributor.department":["Public and International Affairs"],"dc:creator":["Abbott, Bryce Alexander"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2013-06-15T08:00:29Z"],"dc:date.available":["2013-06-15T08:00:29Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2013-06-14"],"dc:description.abstract":["Contemporary methods of food production in the United States have become undeniably destructive ecologically. Two of the strongest symbols of that destruction from corporate industrial agriculture are CAFOs (Confined Animal Feeding Operations) and monoculture crop production. This thesis seeks to find examples of producers refusing these methods as well as what motivates those producers to refuse, and what that refuse could mean politically. The project is grounded theoretically in the work of critical theorists, especially Herbert Marcuse, because the Frankfurt School\\'s criticism of instrumental rationality and understanding of domination functions to elucidate the societal conditions that allow for agricultural (over)production to be swept up in problematic methods in the name of efficiency. Part I starts by analyzing academic as well as popular discourses of CAFOs and the historical process of industrializing meat production and agriculture in the United States. Here both corporate capitalism and enlightenment rationality are indicted and Marcuse\\'s theories are put to work to set up what is being refused. Part II uses examples of organic and local food to provide an understanding for how consumption centered refusals can be co-opted by corporate interest. Part III seeks out contemporary refusals that go past \\'green consumerism\\' and foster a \"new sensibility\" that is grounded in a sense of place, ecological cooperation with nature, and refuses corporatism. In this new sensibility there is a direct rejection of the instrumental rationality, the profit motive and exploitation of nature."],"dc:description.degree":["Master of Public and International Affairs"],"dc:format.medium":["ETD"],"dc:identifier.other":["vt_gsexam:1191"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/23228"],"dc:publisher":["Virginia Tech"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright"],"dc:rights.uri":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:subject":["Critical Theory","Capitalism","Agriculture"],"dc:title":["Cultivating Agricultural Resistance: Alternative Farming as Slow Modernity"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Public and International Affairs"],"thesis:degree_level":["masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Public and International Affairs"],"thesis:institution_name":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:18:39Z"}