Back to results

Virginia Tech

Comparing the Utility of Scoring Methods for the Hinting Task in a Heterogeneous Clinical Sample

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

The Hinting Task is a popular theory of mind measure that has been criticized due to poor psychometric properties. A revised set of scoring criteria has reduced ceilings effects and improved convergent validity of Hinting Task scores in individuals with psychotic-spectrum disorders and matched non-clinical controls. In the current study, we are the first to compare the psychometric properties of the original and revised criteria in a heterogenous clinical sample not characterized by psychotic-spectrum disorders. Given the stringent nature of the revised criteria, we also test the novel hypothesis that participant verbosity may explain differences in performance across scoring criteria. Participants were 173 patients (65% female; 80% non-Hispanic White; M age = 34.4, SD = 12.9) in a partial hospitalization program. Participants completed the Hinting Task, Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Prodromal Questionnaire-Brief, and Behavior And Symptom Identification Scale on their first or second day of treatment. Hinting Task performance was scored by independent raters using both criteria. Results demonstrated that revised criteria scores had significantly lower ceiling effects compared to original criteria scores. Convergent validity of Hinting Task performance was partially supported and did not differ between scoring criteria. Revised, but not original scores were impacted by verbosity, such that less verbose participants demonstrated worse performance. In summary, our results suggest that the revised criteria improve one psychometric aspect of the task while simultaneously introducing verbosity as a confounding variable. We recommend controlling for verbosity when implementing the revised criteria in future research.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Master of Science
Level thesis:degree_level
masters
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Clinical Science
Grantor dc:publisher
Virginia Tech
Year dc:date.issued
2025

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • McKemey, Rory MacAndrew
Chair dc:contributor.committeechair
  • Hudson, Chloe C.
Committee members dc:contributor.committeemember
  • Scarpa, Angela
  • Hickman, Louis

Subjects

dc:subject × 3

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • In Copyright

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Handle dc:identifier.uri
https://hdl.handle.net/10919/141156
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/141156

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Virginia Tech
Base URL
vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

McKemey, Rory MacAndrew. Comparing the Utility of Scoring Methods for the Hinting Task in a Heterogeneous Clinical Sample. masters thesis, Virginia Tech, 2025. https://hdl.handle.net/10919/141156