Back to results

Virginia Tech

A Comparative Study of Machine Learning and Traditional Techniques for Grade Prediction and Grade-Tonnage Evaluation in a Small VMS Deposit

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

Small-scale, high-grade volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposits present unique challenges for resource estimation due to their strong grade variability and complex geological structures. This thesis evaluates whether machine learning methods can improve grade prediction and tonnage estimation compared to traditional methods. A three-dimensional block model with 5 x 5 x 5 m resolution was constructed in Vulcan, and grade estimation was performed using Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW), Simple Kriging (SK), Ordinary Kriging (OK), and ensemble tree models. Traditional methods were assessed using cross-validation within Vulcan, while machine-learning models were evaluated using an independent train-test split. Approximately six million block centroids were exported for full model prediction to compare all methods directly. Machine learning models produced the highest accuracy in the test set but generated low-level noise predictions across sparsely informed areas. A filtering threshold of Au > 0.0001 g/t was applied to mitigate this effect and achieve geologically realistic tonnage estimates. Spatial block-model comparisons, residual analyses, and grade-tonnage curves showed distinct behaviors among methods. IDW yielded the highest tonnage at low cutoffs, Simple Kriging and Random Forest exhibited similar behavior in sparsely informed areas, and Ordinary Kriging consistently produced conservative tonnage estimates. After filtering, ensemble machine learning models provided improved grade discrimination and preserved localized high-grade zones more effectively than traditional methods. This study demonstrates that machine learning approaches can complement traditional methods and offer enhanced performance for small VMS deposits. The results highlight practical considerations for applying machine learning in early-stage resource evaluation and emphasize the need for domain-based modeling in later stages.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Master of Science
Level thesis:degree_level
masters
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Mining Engineering
Department dc:contributor.department
Mining Engineering
Grantor dc:publisher
Virginia Tech
Year dc:date.issued
2025

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Bag, Cemile Dilara
Chair dc:contributor.committeechair
  • Westman, Erik Christian
Committee members dc:contributor.committeemember
  • Pandey, Rohit
  • Frieman, Ben M.

Subjects

dc:subject × 2

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • In Copyright
Language dc:language.iso
en

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Dc Identifier Other
vt_gsexam:45468
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/140020

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Virginia Tech
Base URL
vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-22
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Bag, Cemile Dilara. A Comparative Study of Machine Learning and Traditional Techniques for Grade Prediction and Grade-Tonnage Evaluation in a Small VMS Deposit. masters thesis, Virginia Tech, 2025. https://hdl.handle.net/10919/140020