{"id":{"repo_id":"vt","oai_identifier":"oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/139899"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/vt/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/139899","repository":{"repo_id":"vt","name":"Virginia Tech","base_url":"https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Centering the Disabled User Experience of Health Information in a World Driven by Artificial Intelligence: A Mixed Methods Investigation","abstract":"Disabled people are more susceptible to infectious diseases (like COVID-19) than nondisabled people; finding accurate, relevant health information is especially pressing. Internet search technologies are often touted as empowering disabled people who seek healthcare information online, but does this depiction reflect reality? This dissertation encompasses three studies assessing disabled user experiences in finding health information online: a structured literature review, a cross-sectional survey, and a concurrent think-aloud study. The literature review shows that, across 11 articles, disabled people were often not considered in public health messaging surrounding COVID-19. We then analyze 142 cross-sectional survey responses about usability and satisfaction regarding web-based COVID-19 information. Usability and satisfaction were both lower in people who had developmental or mental health disabilities (r=-0.21, p=0.0131 for usability; r=-0.24, p=0.0111 for satisfaction). Satisfaction was also lower among screen magnification or closed caption users (r=-0.21, p=0.0262). In the concurrent think-aloud study, ten participants were asked to internet search four prompts and narrate their experiences in real-time. Themes included concerns about accessibility/usability, AI-generated information, peer-reviewed articles, hospital or government webpages, news/advertising, and sentiment/trust. Participants also reported physical fatigue (n=5) and distracting layouts (n=5) while searching online. All participants encountered AI-generated information in their searches. This dissertation ends in reflection on how future work by scholars in health and information sciences should be shaped by the input of disabled people.","abstract_html":"Disabled people are more susceptible to infectious diseases (like COVID-19) than nondisabled people; finding accurate, relevant health information is especially pressing. Internet search technologies are often touted as empowering disabled people who seek healthcare information online, but does this depiction reflect reality? This dissertation encompasses three studies assessing disabled user experiences in finding health information online: a structured literature review, a cross-sectional survey, and a concurrent think-aloud study. The literature review shows that, across 11 articles, disabled people were often not considered in public health messaging surrounding COVID-19. We then analyze 142 cross-sectional survey responses about usability and satisfaction regarding web-based COVID-19 information. Usability and satisfaction were both lower in people who had developmental or mental health disabilities (r=-0.21, p=0.0131 for usability; r=-0.24, p=0.0111 for satisfaction). Satisfaction was also lower among screen magnification or closed caption users (r=-0.21, p=0.0262). In the concurrent think-aloud study, ten participants were asked to internet search four prompts and narrate their experiences in real-time. Themes included concerns about accessibility/usability, AI-generated information, peer-reviewed articles, hospital or government webpages, news/advertising, and sentiment/trust. Participants also reported physical fatigue (n=5) and distracting layouts (n=5) while searching online. All participants encountered AI-generated information in their searches. This dissertation ends in reflection on how future work by scholars in health and information sciences should be shaped by the input of disabled people.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Sathe, Sonal Shridhar"],"institution":"Virginia Tech","degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy","degree_level":"doctoral","degree_discipline":"Individual Interdisciplinary PhD","degree_department":"Graduate School","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":["Shew, Ashley","Porter, Nathaniel D."],"committee_members":["Miller, Chreston Allen","Rockwell, Michelle S."],"year":2025,"date_issued":"2025-12-11","date_published":"2025-12-11","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:19:56Z","subjects":["usability","accessibility","disability","consumer health","COVID-19"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["In Copyright"],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["vt_gsexam:45062"],"render_values":[{"text":"vt_gsexam:45062","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/10919/139899","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.committeechair","label":"Committee Chair","values":["Shew, Ashley","Porter, Nathaniel D."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Miller, Chreston Allen","Rockwell, Michelle S."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Graduate School"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Sathe, Sonal Shridhar"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2025-12-12T09:00:50Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2025-12-12T09:00:50Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2025-12-11"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Virginia Tech"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Individual Interdisciplinary PhD"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["doctoral"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Philosophy"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["usability","accessibility","disability","consumer health","COVID-19"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright"]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["vt_gsexam:45062"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/10919/139899"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Disabled people are more susceptible to infectious diseases (like COVID-19) than nondisabled people; finding accurate, relevant health information is especially pressing. Internet search technologies are often touted as empowering disabled people who seek healthcare information online, but does this depiction reflect reality? This dissertation encompasses three studies assessing disabled user experiences in finding health information online: a structured literature review, a cross-sectional survey, and a concurrent think-aloud study. The literature review shows that, across 11 articles, disabled people were often not considered in public health messaging surrounding COVID-19. We then analyze 142 cross-sectional survey responses about usability and satisfaction regarding web-based COVID-19 information. Usability and satisfaction were both lower in people who had developmental or mental health disabilities (r=-0.21, p=0.0131 for usability; r=-0.24, p=0.0111 for satisfaction). Satisfaction was also lower among screen magnification or closed caption users (r=-0.21, p=0.0262). In the concurrent think-aloud study, ten participants were asked to internet search four prompts and narrate their experiences in real-time. Themes included concerns about accessibility/usability, AI-generated information, peer-reviewed articles, hospital or government webpages, news/advertising, and sentiment/trust. Participants also reported physical fatigue (n=5) and distracting layouts (n=5) while searching online. All participants encountered AI-generated information in their searches. This dissertation ends in reflection on how future work by scholars in health and information sciences should be shaped by the input of disabled people."]},{"key":"dc:description.abstractgeneral","label":"General Abstract","values":["Disabled people are more susceptible to infectious diseases (like COVID-19) compared to nondisabled people. Internet search technologies are often touted as an empowering tool for disabled people who seek healthcare information online, but disabled people are often not asked if this is the case. In this study, I perform a structured review of past research on online health communication during the COVID-19 public health emergency, then assess the user experience of disabled people searching for COVID-19 information online via both a survey and a set of real-time interviews. Results indicate that compared to their nondisabled counterparts, disabled people are more likely to find online content about COVID-19 inaccessible, unusable, and dissatisfying. The reasons they gave for this dissatisfaction include outdated information, AI-generated information, and irrelevant news and advertising results. Future work should make accurate COVID-19 information accessible and usable for disabled people and involve their input while doing so in order to ensure user satisfaction."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["Doctor of Philosophy"]},{"key":"dc:format.medium","label":"Dc Format Medium","values":["ETD"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Centering the Disabled User Experience of Health Information in a World Driven by Artificial Intelligence: A Mixed Methods Investigation"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.committeechair":["Shew, Ashley","Porter, Nathaniel D."],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Miller, Chreston Allen","Rockwell, Michelle S."],"dc:contributor.department":["Graduate School"],"dc:creator":["Sathe, Sonal Shridhar"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2025-12-12T09:00:50Z"],"dc:date.available":["2025-12-12T09:00:50Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2025-12-11"],"dc:description.abstract":["Disabled people are more susceptible to infectious diseases (like COVID-19) than nondisabled people; finding accurate, relevant health information is especially pressing. Internet search technologies are often touted as empowering disabled people who seek healthcare information online, but does this depiction reflect reality? This dissertation encompasses three studies assessing disabled user experiences in finding health information online: a structured literature review, a cross-sectional survey, and a concurrent think-aloud study. The literature review shows that, across 11 articles, disabled people were often not considered in public health messaging surrounding COVID-19. We then analyze 142 cross-sectional survey responses about usability and satisfaction regarding web-based COVID-19 information. Usability and satisfaction were both lower in people who had developmental or mental health disabilities (r=-0.21, p=0.0131 for usability; r=-0.24, p=0.0111 for satisfaction). Satisfaction was also lower among screen magnification or closed caption users (r=-0.21, p=0.0262). In the concurrent think-aloud study, ten participants were asked to internet search four prompts and narrate their experiences in real-time. Themes included concerns about accessibility/usability, AI-generated information, peer-reviewed articles, hospital or government webpages, news/advertising, and sentiment/trust. Participants also reported physical fatigue (n=5) and distracting layouts (n=5) while searching online. All participants encountered AI-generated information in their searches. This dissertation ends in reflection on how future work by scholars in health and information sciences should be shaped by the input of disabled people."],"dc:description.abstractgeneral":["Disabled people are more susceptible to infectious diseases (like COVID-19) compared to nondisabled people. Internet search technologies are often touted as an empowering tool for disabled people who seek healthcare information online, but disabled people are often not asked if this is the case. In this study, I perform a structured review of past research on online health communication during the COVID-19 public health emergency, then assess the user experience of disabled people searching for COVID-19 information online via both a survey and a set of real-time interviews. Results indicate that compared to their nondisabled counterparts, disabled people are more likely to find online content about COVID-19 inaccessible, unusable, and dissatisfying. The reasons they gave for this dissatisfaction include outdated information, AI-generated information, and irrelevant news and advertising results. Future work should make accurate COVID-19 information accessible and usable for disabled people and involve their input while doing so in order to ensure user satisfaction."],"dc:description.degree":["Doctor of Philosophy"],"dc:format.medium":["ETD"],"dc:identifier.other":["vt_gsexam:45062"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/10919/139899"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:publisher":["Virginia Tech"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright"],"dc:rights.uri":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:subject":["usability","accessibility","disability","consumer health","COVID-19"],"dc:title":["Centering the Disabled User Experience of Health Information in a World Driven by Artificial Intelligence: A Mixed Methods Investigation"],"dc:type":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Individual Interdisciplinary PhD"],"thesis:degree_level":["doctoral"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Philosophy"],"thesis:institution_name":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:19:56Z"}