{"id":{"repo_id":"vt","oai_identifier":"oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/120986"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/vt/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/120986","repository":{"repo_id":"vt","name":"Virginia Tech","base_url":"https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Operationalizing Data Culture: The US Army's Engagements With Data Science 1961-2023","abstract":"Culture frames what an institution values, reveres, and rewards. It emerges over an extended period, sometimes deliberately, often indirectly. As a subset of organizational culture, a common understanding of both data and culture is needed in order to build the data culture the Army desires. This study examines data culture within the context of the US Army and its interactions with data science over the past six decades. It uses Science and Technology Studies (STS) scholarship to analyze Army data culture from the perspectives of leadership, expertise, technology, and structure and practices to better understand how it can be shaped to better support the Army's goals. This study posits that rather than adopting a data culture as something entirely new, the Army would be better served by an understanding of the data culture it already has, made up of entrenched policy and operational approaches perpetuated over decades, some of which are unsuitable for the current and future environment. A second posit is that Army data culture is situated within a broader context and cannot be understood independently of the external cultures and social systems with which it interacts. And third, STS scholarship is uniquely suited to inform this type of analysis. I conclude that the Army should focus resources on educating leaders on how to assess, build and sustain positive data cultures in their organizations.","abstract_html":"Culture frames what an institution values, reveres, and rewards. It emerges over an extended period, sometimes deliberately, often indirectly. As a subset of organizational culture, a common understanding of both data and culture is needed in order to build the data culture the Army desires. This study examines data culture within the context of the US Army and its interactions with data science over the past six decades. It uses Science and Technology Studies (STS) scholarship to analyze Army data culture from the perspectives of leadership, expertise, technology, and structure and practices to better understand how it can be shaped to better support the Army's goals. This study posits that rather than adopting a data culture as something entirely new, the Army would be better served by an understanding of the data culture it already has, made up of entrenched policy and operational approaches perpetuated over decades, some of which are unsuitable for the current and future environment. A second posit is that Army data culture is situated within a broader context and cannot be understood independently of the external cultures and social systems with which it interacts. And third, STS scholarship is uniquely suited to inform this type of analysis. I conclude that the Army should focus resources on educating leaders on how to assess, build and sustain positive data cultures in their organizations.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Jantzen, Linda Carol"],"institution":"Virginia Tech","degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy","degree_level":"doctoral","degree_discipline":"Science and Technology Studies","degree_department":"Science and Technology Studies","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":["Abbate, Janet E."],"committee_members":["Fitzpatrick, Anne C.","Vinsel, Lee","Wisnioski, Matthew"],"year":2024,"date_issued":"2024-08-21","date_published":"2024-08-21","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:19:04Z","subjects":["Army","data culture","data science","data literacy","data pathologies","STS"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["In Copyright"],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["vt_gsexam:41263"],"render_values":[{"text":"vt_gsexam:41263","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/10919/120986","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.committeechair","label":"Committee Chair","values":["Abbate, Janet E."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Fitzpatrick, Anne C.","Vinsel, Lee","Wisnioski, Matthew"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Science and Technology Studies"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Jantzen, Linda Carol"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2024-08-22T08:00:54Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2024-08-22T08:00:54Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2024-08-21"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Virginia Tech"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Science and Technology Studies"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["doctoral"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Philosophy"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Army","data culture","data science","data literacy","data pathologies","STS"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright"]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["vt_gsexam:41263"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/10919/120986"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Culture frames what an institution values, reveres, and rewards. It emerges over an extended period, sometimes deliberately, often indirectly. As a subset of organizational culture, a common understanding of both data and culture is needed in order to build the data culture the Army desires. This study examines data culture within the context of the US Army and its interactions with data science over the past six decades. It uses Science and Technology Studies (STS) scholarship to analyze Army data culture from the perspectives of leadership, expertise, technology, and structure and practices to better understand how it can be shaped to better support the Army's goals. This study posits that rather than adopting a data culture as something entirely new, the Army would be better served by an understanding of the data culture it already has, made up of entrenched policy and operational approaches perpetuated over decades, some of which are unsuitable for the current and future environment. A second posit is that Army data culture is situated within a broader context and cannot be understood independently of the external cultures and social systems with which it interacts. And third, STS scholarship is uniquely suited to inform this type of analysis. I conclude that the Army should focus resources on educating leaders on how to assess, build and sustain positive data cultures in their organizations."]},{"key":"dc:description.abstractgeneral","label":"General Abstract","values":["Culture frames what an institution values, reveres, and rewards. It emerges over an extended period, sometimes deliberately, often indirectly. As a subset of organizational culture, a common understanding of both data and culture is needed in order to build the data culture the Army desires. This study examines data culture within the context of the US Army and its interactions with data science over the past six decades. It uses Science and Technology Studies (STS) scholarship to analyze Army data culture from the perspectives of leadership, expertise, technology, and structure and practices to better understand how it can be shaped to better support the Army's goals. This study posits that rather than adopting a data culture as something entirely new, the Army would be better served by an understanding of the data culture it already has, made up of entrenched policy and operational approaches perpetuated over decades, some of which are unsuitable for the current and future environment. A second posit is that Army data culture is situated within a broader context and cannot be understood independently of the external cultures and social systems with which it interacts. And third, STS scholarship is uniquely suited to inform this type of analysis. I conclude that the Army should focus resources on educating leaders on how to assess, build and sustain positive data cultures in their organizations."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["Doctor of Philosophy"]},{"key":"dc:format.medium","label":"Dc Format Medium","values":["ETD"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Operationalizing Data Culture: The US Army's Engagements With Data Science 1961-2023"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.committeechair":["Abbate, Janet E."],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Fitzpatrick, Anne C.","Vinsel, Lee","Wisnioski, Matthew"],"dc:contributor.department":["Science and Technology Studies"],"dc:creator":["Jantzen, Linda Carol"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2024-08-22T08:00:54Z"],"dc:date.available":["2024-08-22T08:00:54Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2024-08-21"],"dc:description.abstract":["Culture frames what an institution values, reveres, and rewards. It emerges over an extended period, sometimes deliberately, often indirectly. As a subset of organizational culture, a common understanding of both data and culture is needed in order to build the data culture the Army desires. This study examines data culture within the context of the US Army and its interactions with data science over the past six decades. It uses Science and Technology Studies (STS) scholarship to analyze Army data culture from the perspectives of leadership, expertise, technology, and structure and practices to better understand how it can be shaped to better support the Army's goals. This study posits that rather than adopting a data culture as something entirely new, the Army would be better served by an understanding of the data culture it already has, made up of entrenched policy and operational approaches perpetuated over decades, some of which are unsuitable for the current and future environment. A second posit is that Army data culture is situated within a broader context and cannot be understood independently of the external cultures and social systems with which it interacts. And third, STS scholarship is uniquely suited to inform this type of analysis. I conclude that the Army should focus resources on educating leaders on how to assess, build and sustain positive data cultures in their organizations."],"dc:description.abstractgeneral":["Culture frames what an institution values, reveres, and rewards. It emerges over an extended period, sometimes deliberately, often indirectly. As a subset of organizational culture, a common understanding of both data and culture is needed in order to build the data culture the Army desires. This study examines data culture within the context of the US Army and its interactions with data science over the past six decades. It uses Science and Technology Studies (STS) scholarship to analyze Army data culture from the perspectives of leadership, expertise, technology, and structure and practices to better understand how it can be shaped to better support the Army's goals. This study posits that rather than adopting a data culture as something entirely new, the Army would be better served by an understanding of the data culture it already has, made up of entrenched policy and operational approaches perpetuated over decades, some of which are unsuitable for the current and future environment. A second posit is that Army data culture is situated within a broader context and cannot be understood independently of the external cultures and social systems with which it interacts. And third, STS scholarship is uniquely suited to inform this type of analysis. I conclude that the Army should focus resources on educating leaders on how to assess, build and sustain positive data cultures in their organizations."],"dc:description.degree":["Doctor of Philosophy"],"dc:format.medium":["ETD"],"dc:identifier.other":["vt_gsexam:41263"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/10919/120986"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:publisher":["Virginia Tech"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright"],"dc:rights.uri":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:subject":["Army","data culture","data science","data literacy","data pathologies","STS"],"dc:title":["Operationalizing Data Culture: The US Army's Engagements With Data Science 1961-2023"],"dc:type":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Science and Technology Studies"],"thesis:degree_level":["doctoral"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Philosophy"],"thesis:institution_name":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:19:04Z"}