Short-term Comparison of Frictional Properties of Superpave and Balance Mix Design Hot Mix Asphalt Mixes

Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) design has undergone years of development. Currently, many state agencies use the Superpave mix design method. While the Superpave mix design improved rutting, the implemented level 1 only considered volumetric properties and not mixture performance tests. Therefore, development in the asphalt community has addressed some of the issues with the Superpave mix design, e.g., cracking and raveling, with the Balance Mix Design (BMD) approaches. The Balance Mix Design incorporates performance testing elements that the level 1 Superpave mix design does not. The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) aims to implement the Balance Mix Design by 2023. The objective of this thesis is to evaluate the initial frictional properties of mixes designed using the Balanced Mix Design method to verify that safety is not compromised to support the implementation of the BMD method within VDOT. It provides a further understanding of BMD mixtures surface properties provides insight into volumetric properties that may influence macrotexture. The thesis analyzed the initial friction and macrotexture of a series of experimental sections built to support VDOT BMD implementation efforts. A Side-Force Coefficient Road Investigation Machine (SCRIM) was used to measure friction and texture data on Control (Superpave Mix Design) and Balance Mix Design sections on several VDOT districts. Once the data was collected, it was analyzed using descriptive statistics and mean comparisons to determine any statistical differences in the friction and texture of the Control and BMD Mixes. The analysis showed that although statistically significant differences in friction and macrotexture were observed between some of the Superpave (Control) and Balance Mix Design mixes, the differences seem to be more prominent among districts than between the mix design method. In general, there were no difference in friction between control and BMD mixes in the same locations. On the other hand, there is statistically significant differences in the as-constructed macrotexture of Superpave and BMD mixes evaluated, with more BMD mixes having higher macrotexture than their control counterparts. Further analysis was conducted to create a macrotexture prediction model based on production volumetric properties obtained from VDOT databases. The model provided an initial assessment of the main HMA properties that influence MPD. A comparison of the macrotexture of the constructed in the various locations found that there is strong statistical evidence that the mean macrotexture of the pavement constructed in the various location was different. The analysis also showed that some projects produced sections with more uniform macrotexture than others. Comparison of mixes constructed in different years does not suggest any significant differences over the three-construction season evaluated.

Name thesis:degree_name

Master of Science

Level thesis:degree_level

masters

Discipline thesis:degree_discipline

Civil Engineering

Department dc:contributor.department

Civil and Environmental Engineering

Grantor dc:publisher

Virginia Tech

Year dc:date.issued

2022

Author dc:creator

• Matics, Janie Katherine

Chair dc:contributor.committeechair

• Flintsch, Gerardo W.

Committee members dc:contributor.committeemember

• Heaslip, Kevin Patrick
• Katicha, Samer Wehbe

• Balance Mix Design
• Surface Properties
• Macrotexture
• MPD
• Friction
• SCRIM
• HMA
• Mix Volumetrics

Statement dc:rights

• In Copyright

Licence dc:rights.uri

• http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/

Language dc:language.iso

en

Dc Identifier Other

vt_gsexam:35326

OAI identifier oai:identifier

oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/111435