{"id":{"repo_id":"vt","oai_identifier":"oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/111051"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/vt/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/111051","repository":{"repo_id":"vt","name":"Virginia Tech","base_url":"https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Moment estimators involving the second and third sample moments for the negative binomial distribution","abstract":"This thesis essentially takes two separate paths to solve the same problem, namely that of obtaining an estimator, a parameter of the negative binomial distribution, for which we can show that such properties as bias and variance of this estimator are \"better\" than corresponding properties of the simple moment estimator, the latter being the estimator which is used most often in practice. We first consider two moment estimators involving the third sample moment. In the case of both of these estimators, for a restricted range of the parameters and of sample size, these estimators are not an improvement over the simple moment estimator. In fact, for the range considered, the bias and variance of the simple moment estimator was always smaller. We then considered an estimator which was defined as the simple moment estimator for part of the sample space and defined as a constant elsewhere. This was primarily done to remove a \"singularity\" in the moment estimator. It was felt that this singularity was causing the large bias and variance which seemed to exist for certain values of the parameters. For n=100, the bias and variance were approximated in a range of interest of the parameters. The results indicate an improvement over the sample moment estimator.","abstract_html":"This thesis essentially takes two separate paths to solve the same problem, namely that of obtaining an estimator, a parameter of the negative binomial distribution, for which we can show that such properties as bias and variance of this estimator are "better" than corresponding properties of the simple moment estimator, the latter being the estimator which is used most often in practice. We first consider two moment estimators involving the third sample moment. In the case of both of these estimators, for a restricted range of the parameters and of sample size, these estimators are not an improvement over the simple moment estimator. In fact, for the range considered, the bias and variance of the simple moment estimator was always smaller. We then considered an estimator which was defined as the simple moment estimator for part of the sample space and defined as a constant elsewhere. This was primarily done to remove a "singularity" in the moment estimator. It was felt that this singularity was causing the large bias and variance which seemed to exist for certain values of the parameters. For n=100, the bias and variance were approximated in a range of interest of the parameters. The results indicate an improvement over the sample moment estimator.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Mah, Valiant Wai-Yung"],"institution":"Virginia Polytechnic Institute","degree_name":"Ph. D.","degree_level":"doctoral","degree_discipline":"Statistics","degree_department":"Statistics","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1965,"date_issued":"1965","date_published":"1965","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:19:31Z","subjects":[],"languages":["en"],"rights":["In Copyright"],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10919/111051","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Statistics"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Mah, Valiant Wai-Yung"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2022-06-29T19:26:51Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2022-06-29T19:26:51Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["1965"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"dc:type.dcmitype","label":"Dc Type Dcmitype","values":["Text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Statistics"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["doctoral"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph. D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright"]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/111051"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This thesis essentially takes two separate paths to solve the same problem, namely that of obtaining an estimator, a parameter of the negative binomial distribution, for which we can show that such properties as bias and variance of this estimator are \"better\" than corresponding properties of the simple moment estimator, the latter being the estimator which is used most often in practice. We first consider two moment estimators involving the third sample moment. In the case of both of these estimators, for a restricted range of the parameters and of sample size, these estimators are not an improvement over the simple moment estimator. In fact, for the range considered, the bias and variance of the simple moment estimator was always smaller. We then considered an estimator which was defined as the simple moment estimator for part of the sample space and defined as a constant elsewhere. This was primarily done to remove a \"singularity\" in the moment estimator. It was felt that this singularity was causing the large bias and variance which seemed to exist for certain values of the parameters. For n=100, the bias and variance were approximated in a range of interest of the parameters. The results indicate an improvement over the sample moment estimator."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["Ph. D."]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Moment estimators involving the second and third sample moments for the negative binomial distribution"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.department":["Statistics"],"dc:creator":["Mah, Valiant Wai-Yung"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2022-06-29T19:26:51Z"],"dc:date.available":["2022-06-29T19:26:51Z"],"dc:date.issued":["1965"],"dc:description.abstract":["This thesis essentially takes two separate paths to solve the same problem, namely that of obtaining an estimator, a parameter of the negative binomial distribution, for which we can show that such properties as bias and variance of this estimator are \"better\" than corresponding properties of the simple moment estimator, the latter being the estimator which is used most often in practice. We first consider two moment estimators involving the third sample moment. In the case of both of these estimators, for a restricted range of the parameters and of sample size, these estimators are not an improvement over the simple moment estimator. In fact, for the range considered, the bias and variance of the simple moment estimator was always smaller. We then considered an estimator which was defined as the simple moment estimator for part of the sample space and defined as a constant elsewhere. This was primarily done to remove a \"singularity\" in the moment estimator. It was felt that this singularity was causing the large bias and variance which seemed to exist for certain values of the parameters. For n=100, the bias and variance were approximated in a range of interest of the parameters. The results indicate an improvement over the sample moment estimator."],"dc:description.degree":["Ph. D."],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/111051"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:publisher":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright"],"dc:rights.uri":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:title":["Moment estimators involving the second and third sample moments for the negative binomial distribution"],"dc:type":["Dissertation"],"dc:type.dcmitype":["Text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Statistics"],"thesis:degree_level":["doctoral"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph. D."],"thesis:institution_name":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:19:31Z"}