{"id":{"repo_id":"vt","oai_identifier":"oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/110503"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/vt/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/110503","repository":{"repo_id":"vt","name":"Virginia Tech","base_url":"https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Design and Evaluation of an Underactuated Lower Body Exoskeleton","abstract":"An underactuated exoskeleton design for walking assistance is presented and evaluated. The exoskeleton uses one motor per leg and makes use of a pantograph to reduce the overall profile and allow the exoskeleton to closely follow the shape of the user's leg. Support is provided between the ball of the user's foot and their waist by compressing a spring in parallel with the user's leg during Stance Phase. The exoskeleton has a mass of 14.0 kg (30.8 lbs) and was tested up to a supplied spring force of 323.6 N (72.75 lbf) which equates to around 161.8 N (36.38 lbf) of assistive force at the waist. Range of motion tests showed minimal restriction at the knee and ankle, but some restriction of the hip. Human subject experiments using a simple gait detection method based on GRF at walking speeds from 0.45 m/s to 1.12 m/s (1.0 mph to 2.5 mph) were performed and showed an increase in the time between actual heel strike and predicted heel strike of approximately 0.05 seconds to 0.1 seconds. Lastly, calculations are presented examining the effect of exoskeleton assistance on the biological joint moments and optimizing the actuator design to reduce power consumption. The actual performance of the exoskeleton is compared with the calculations based on the joint angles during a typical walking cycle.","abstract_html":"An underactuated exoskeleton design for walking assistance is presented and evaluated. The exoskeleton uses one motor per leg and makes use of a pantograph to reduce the overall profile and allow the exoskeleton to closely follow the shape of the user's leg. Support is provided between the ball of the user's foot and their waist by compressing a spring in parallel with the user's leg during Stance Phase. The exoskeleton has a mass of 14.0 kg (30.8 lbs) and was tested up to a supplied spring force of 323.6 N (72.75 lbf) which equates to around 161.8 N (36.38 lbf) of assistive force at the waist. Range of motion tests showed minimal restriction at the knee and ankle, but some restriction of the hip. Human subject experiments using a simple gait detection method based on GRF at walking speeds from 0.45 m/s to 1.12 m/s (1.0 mph to 2.5 mph) were performed and showed an increase in the time between actual heel strike and predicted heel strike of approximately 0.05 seconds to 0.1 seconds. Lastly, calculations are presented examining the effect of exoskeleton assistance on the biological joint moments and optimizing the actuator design to reduce power consumption. The actual performance of the exoskeleton is compared with the calculations based on the joint angles during a typical walking cycle.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Biggers, Zackory James"],"institution":"Virginia Tech","degree_name":"Master of Science","degree_level":"masters","degree_discipline":"Mechanical Engineering","degree_department":"Mechanical Engineering","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":["Asbeck, Alan T."],"committee_members":["Akbari Hamed, Kaveh","Nussbaum, Maury A."],"year":2022,"date_issued":"2022-06-08","date_published":"2022-06-08","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:20:18Z","subjects":["exoskeleton","lower body","underactuated","pantograph","gait cycle"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["In Copyright"],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["vt_gsexam:35019"],"render_values":[{"text":"vt_gsexam:35019","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10919/110503","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.committeechair","label":"Committee Chair","values":["Asbeck, Alan T."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Akbari Hamed, Kaveh","Nussbaum, Maury A."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Mechanical Engineering"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Biggers, Zackory James"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2022-06-09T08:00:56Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2022-06-09T08:00:56Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2022-06-08"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Virginia Tech"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Mechanical Engineering"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["exoskeleton","lower body","underactuated","pantograph","gait cycle"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright"]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["vt_gsexam:35019"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/110503"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["An underactuated exoskeleton design for walking assistance is presented and evaluated. The exoskeleton uses one motor per leg and makes use of a pantograph to reduce the overall profile and allow the exoskeleton to closely follow the shape of the user's leg. Support is provided between the ball of the user's foot and their waist by compressing a spring in parallel with the user's leg during Stance Phase. The exoskeleton has a mass of 14.0 kg (30.8 lbs) and was tested up to a supplied spring force of 323.6 N (72.75 lbf) which equates to around 161.8 N (36.38 lbf) of assistive force at the waist. Range of motion tests showed minimal restriction at the knee and ankle, but some restriction of the hip. Human subject experiments using a simple gait detection method based on GRF at walking speeds from 0.45 m/s to 1.12 m/s (1.0 mph to 2.5 mph) were performed and showed an increase in the time between actual heel strike and predicted heel strike of approximately 0.05 seconds to 0.1 seconds. Lastly, calculations are presented examining the effect of exoskeleton assistance on the biological joint moments and optimizing the actuator design to reduce power consumption. The actual performance of the exoskeleton is compared with the calculations based on the joint angles during a typical walking cycle."]},{"key":"dc:description.abstractgeneral","label":"General Abstract","values":["A design for an exoskeleton capable of providing walking assistance without requiring a motor for every joint is presented and evaluated. The exoskeleton uses one motor per leg and makes use of a pantograph to reduce the required size and allow the exoskeleton to closely follow the shape of the user's leg. Support is provided between the ball of the user's foot and their waist by compressing a spring attached beside the user's leg while the user's foot is on the ground. The exoskeleton weighs 14.0 kg (30.8 lbs) and was tested up to a supplied spring force of 323.6 N (72.75 lbf) which equates to around 161.8 N (36.38 lbf) of assistive force at the waist. Range of motion tests showed minimal restriction at the knee and ankle, but some at the hip. Testing with a human participant using a simple method for determining when to apply support and remove it based on the forces measured at the user's foot were performed at walking speeds of 0.45 m/s to 1.12 m/s (1.0 mph to 2.5 mph). These tests showed an increase in the time between when the heel of the foot initially hits the ground and when the exoskeleton code determined that it occurred of approximately 0.05 seconds to 0.1 seconds. Lastly, calculations are presented examining how exoskeleton assistance affects what is felt at the joints of the user and determining what spring stiffness would best reduce the power required from the motors. The actual performance of the exoskeleton is compared with the calculations based on the joint angles during normal human walking."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["Master of Science"]},{"key":"dc:format.medium","label":"Dc Format Medium","values":["ETD"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Design and Evaluation of an Underactuated Lower Body Exoskeleton"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.committeechair":["Asbeck, Alan T."],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Akbari Hamed, Kaveh","Nussbaum, Maury A."],"dc:contributor.department":["Mechanical Engineering"],"dc:creator":["Biggers, Zackory James"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2022-06-09T08:00:56Z"],"dc:date.available":["2022-06-09T08:00:56Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2022-06-08"],"dc:description.abstract":["An underactuated exoskeleton design for walking assistance is presented and evaluated. The exoskeleton uses one motor per leg and makes use of a pantograph to reduce the overall profile and allow the exoskeleton to closely follow the shape of the user's leg. Support is provided between the ball of the user's foot and their waist by compressing a spring in parallel with the user's leg during Stance Phase. The exoskeleton has a mass of 14.0 kg (30.8 lbs) and was tested up to a supplied spring force of 323.6 N (72.75 lbf) which equates to around 161.8 N (36.38 lbf) of assistive force at the waist. Range of motion tests showed minimal restriction at the knee and ankle, but some restriction of the hip. Human subject experiments using a simple gait detection method based on GRF at walking speeds from 0.45 m/s to 1.12 m/s (1.0 mph to 2.5 mph) were performed and showed an increase in the time between actual heel strike and predicted heel strike of approximately 0.05 seconds to 0.1 seconds. Lastly, calculations are presented examining the effect of exoskeleton assistance on the biological joint moments and optimizing the actuator design to reduce power consumption. The actual performance of the exoskeleton is compared with the calculations based on the joint angles during a typical walking cycle."],"dc:description.abstractgeneral":["A design for an exoskeleton capable of providing walking assistance without requiring a motor for every joint is presented and evaluated. The exoskeleton uses one motor per leg and makes use of a pantograph to reduce the required size and allow the exoskeleton to closely follow the shape of the user's leg. Support is provided between the ball of the user's foot and their waist by compressing a spring attached beside the user's leg while the user's foot is on the ground. The exoskeleton weighs 14.0 kg (30.8 lbs) and was tested up to a supplied spring force of 323.6 N (72.75 lbf) which equates to around 161.8 N (36.38 lbf) of assistive force at the waist. Range of motion tests showed minimal restriction at the knee and ankle, but some at the hip. Testing with a human participant using a simple method for determining when to apply support and remove it based on the forces measured at the user's foot were performed at walking speeds of 0.45 m/s to 1.12 m/s (1.0 mph to 2.5 mph). These tests showed an increase in the time between when the heel of the foot initially hits the ground and when the exoskeleton code determined that it occurred of approximately 0.05 seconds to 0.1 seconds. Lastly, calculations are presented examining how exoskeleton assistance affects what is felt at the joints of the user and determining what spring stiffness would best reduce the power required from the motors. The actual performance of the exoskeleton is compared with the calculations based on the joint angles during normal human walking."],"dc:description.degree":["Master of Science"],"dc:format.medium":["ETD"],"dc:identifier.other":["vt_gsexam:35019"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/110503"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:publisher":["Virginia Tech"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright"],"dc:rights.uri":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:subject":["exoskeleton","lower body","underactuated","pantograph","gait cycle"],"dc:title":["Design and Evaluation of an Underactuated Lower Body Exoskeleton"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Mechanical Engineering"],"thesis:degree_level":["masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science"],"thesis:institution_name":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:20:18Z"}