Framework for Optimally Constrained Autonomous Driving Systems

The development of Automated Driving Systems (ADS) has been ongoing for decades in varying levels of sophistication. Levels of automation are defined by Society of American Engineers (SAE) as 0 through 5, with 0 being full human control and 5 being full automation control. Another way to describe levels of automation is through concepts of Functional Safety (FuSa) and Operational Safety (OpSa). These terms of FuSa and OpSa are important, because ADS testing relies on both. Current recommendations for ADS testing include both OpSa and FuSa requirements. However, an examination of ADS safety requirements (e.g., industry reports, post-crash analysis reports, etc.) reveals that ADS safety arguments, in practice, depend almost completely on well-trained human operators, referred to in the industry as in vehicle fallback test drivers (IFTD). To date, the industry has never fielded a truly SAE L4 ADS on public roads due to this persistent hurdle of needing a human operator for Operational Safety. There is a tendency in ADS testing to reference International Standards Organization (ISOs) for validated vehicles for vehicles that are still in development (i.e., unvalidated). To be clear, ISOs for ADS end products are not necessarily applicable to ADS in development. With this in mind, there is a clear gap in the industry for unvalidated ADS literature. Because of this gap, ADS testing for unvalidated vehicles often relies on safety requirements for validated vehicles. This issue remains a significant challenge for ADS testing. Recognizing this gap in on-road, in-development vehicle safety, there is a need for the ADS industry to develop a clear strategy for transitioning from an IFTD (Operational Safety) to an ADS (Functional Safety). Therefore, the purpose of this thesis is to present a framework for transitioning from Operational Safety to Functional Safety. The framework makes this possible through an inductive analysis of available definitions of onroad safety to arrive at a definition that leverages Functional and Operational Safety along a continuum. Ultimately, the framework aims to contribute to onroad safety testing for the ADS industry.

Name thesis:degree_name

Master of Science

Level thesis:degree_level

masters

Discipline thesis:degree_discipline

Mechanical Engineering

Department dc:contributor.department

Mechanical Engineering

Grantor dc:publisher

Virginia Tech

Year dc:date.issued

2020

Author dc:creator

• Repisky, Philip Vaclav

Chair dc:contributor.committeechair

• Wicks, Alfred L.

Committee members dc:contributor.committeemember

• Southward, Steve C.
• Asbeck, Alan T.

• Autonomous vehicles
• Autonomous vehicle safety
• Autonomous vehicle validation
• Operational safety
• Functional safety

Statement dc:rights

• Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Licence dc:rights.uri

• http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Dc Identifier Other

vt_gsexam:27745

OAI identifier oai:identifier

oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/110312