{"id":{"repo_id":"vt","oai_identifier":"oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/109241"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/vt/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/109241","repository":{"repo_id":"vt","name":"Virginia Tech","base_url":"https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Monte Carlo validation of two genetic clustering algorithms","abstract":"Cluster analysis refers to a type of statistical method designed to identify homogeneous groups within complex, multivariate data sets. In this study two newly developed genetic cluster analysis algorithms, GENCLUS and GENCLUS+, were validated by comparing their performance against that of three popular clustering techniques (Ward's method, K-means w/ random seeds, K-means w/Ward's centroids) and in an elaborate Monte Carlo study. Additionally, the ability of GENCLUS+ to determine the correct number of clusters was compared against that of three conventional procedures (Calinski and Harabasz, C-index, trace W). GENCLUS and GENCLUS+ achieved Rand recovery values slightly inferior to those of conventional methods. However, GENCLUS+ appeared to perform better than conventional methods in an empirical analysis, and genetic method solutions appear to possess high internal cohesion and external isolation. The mixed results are interpreted as an indication of a discrepancy between cluster theory and conventional data generation techniques.","abstract_html":"Cluster analysis refers to a type of statistical method designed to identify homogeneous groups within complex, multivariate data sets. In this study two newly developed genetic cluster analysis algorithms, GENCLUS and GENCLUS+, were validated by comparing their performance against that of three popular clustering techniques (Ward's method, K-means w/ random seeds, K-means w/Ward's centroids) and in an elaborate Monte Carlo study. Additionally, the ability of GENCLUS+ to determine the correct number of clusters was compared against that of three conventional procedures (Calinski and Harabasz, C-index, trace W). GENCLUS and GENCLUS+ achieved Rand recovery values slightly inferior to those of conventional methods. However, GENCLUS+ appeared to perform better than conventional methods in an empirical analysis, and genetic method solutions appear to possess high internal cohesion and external isolation. The mixed results are interpreted as an indication of a discrepancy between cluster theory and conventional data generation techniques.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Cowgill, Marc"],"institution":"Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University","degree_name":"Ph. D.","degree_level":"doctoral","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":"Psychology","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1993,"date_issued":"1993","date_published":"1993","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:18:39Z","subjects":[],"languages":["en"],"rights":["In Copyright"],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10919/109241","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Cowgill, Marc"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2022-03-08T20:03:19Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2022-03-08T20:03:19Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["1993"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"dc:type.dcmitype","label":"Dc Type Dcmitype","values":["Text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["doctoral"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph. D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright"]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/109241"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Cluster analysis refers to a type of statistical method designed to identify homogeneous groups within complex, multivariate data sets. In this study two newly developed genetic cluster analysis algorithms, GENCLUS and GENCLUS+, were validated by comparing their performance against that of three popular clustering techniques (Ward's method, K-means w/ random seeds, K-means w/Ward's centroids) and in an elaborate Monte Carlo study. Additionally, the ability of GENCLUS+ to determine the correct number of clusters was compared against that of three conventional procedures (Calinski and Harabasz, C-index, trace W). GENCLUS and GENCLUS+ achieved Rand recovery values slightly inferior to those of conventional methods. However, GENCLUS+ appeared to perform better than conventional methods in an empirical analysis, and genetic method solutions appear to possess high internal cohesion and external isolation. The mixed results are interpreted as an indication of a discrepancy between cluster theory and conventional data generation techniques."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["Ph. D."]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Monte Carlo validation of two genetic clustering algorithms"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.department":["Psychology"],"dc:creator":["Cowgill, Marc"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2022-03-08T20:03:19Z"],"dc:date.available":["2022-03-08T20:03:19Z"],"dc:date.issued":["1993"],"dc:description.abstract":["Cluster analysis refers to a type of statistical method designed to identify homogeneous groups within complex, multivariate data sets. In this study two newly developed genetic cluster analysis algorithms, GENCLUS and GENCLUS+, were validated by comparing their performance against that of three popular clustering techniques (Ward's method, K-means w/ random seeds, K-means w/Ward's centroids) and in an elaborate Monte Carlo study. Additionally, the ability of GENCLUS+ to determine the correct number of clusters was compared against that of three conventional procedures (Calinski and Harabasz, C-index, trace W). GENCLUS and GENCLUS+ achieved Rand recovery values slightly inferior to those of conventional methods. However, GENCLUS+ appeared to perform better than conventional methods in an empirical analysis, and genetic method solutions appear to possess high internal cohesion and external isolation. The mixed results are interpreted as an indication of a discrepancy between cluster theory and conventional data generation techniques."],"dc:description.degree":["Ph. D."],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/109241"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:publisher":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright"],"dc:rights.uri":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:title":["Monte Carlo validation of two genetic clustering algorithms"],"dc:type":["Dissertation"],"dc:type.dcmitype":["Text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["doctoral"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph. D."],"thesis:institution_name":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:18:39Z"}