{"id":{"repo_id":"vt","oai_identifier":"oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/106253"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/vt/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/106253","repository":{"repo_id":"vt","name":"Virginia Tech","base_url":"https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"The effects of rating purpose and anonymity on self-ratings of ability and performance","abstract":"The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of rating purpose and anonymity on the psychometric characteristics of self-ratings. Employees of the United States Marshals Service rated their proficiency on 66 job-related knowledges and skills, and on overall performance. Instructions stated. that the purpose of the ratings was either administration, research, i.e. training needs assessment. In addition, subjects were either required to sign their names or to remain anonymous. Each employee's immediate supervisor also provided ratings for each subject. Self-rating leniency did not vary as a function of anonymity. Self-ratings made for training purposes were less lenient than ratings made for administration or research. Self-ratings demonstrated less halo than supervisor ratings. In addition, self-ratings exhibited less variance and more leniency than supervisor-ratings. It is suggested that self-ratings may be a useful method of identifying training needs when used in conjunction with supervisory evaluations.","abstract_html":"The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of rating purpose and anonymity on the psychometric characteristics of self-ratings. Employees of the United States Marshals Service rated their proficiency on 66 job-related knowledges and skills, and on overall performance. Instructions stated. that the purpose of the ratings was either administration, research, i.e. training needs assessment. In addition, subjects were either required to sign their names or to remain anonymous. Each employee's immediate supervisor also provided ratings for each subject. Self-rating leniency did not vary as a function of anonymity. Self-ratings made for training purposes were less lenient than ratings made for administration or research. Self-ratings demonstrated less halo than supervisor ratings. In addition, self-ratings exhibited less variance and more leniency than supervisor-ratings. It is suggested that self-ratings may be a useful method of identifying training needs when used in conjunction with supervisory evaluations.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Arnaut, Lynn Y."],"institution":"Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University","degree_name":"M.S.","degree_level":"masters","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":"Psychology","school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1983,"date_issued":"1983","date_published":"1983","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:20:35Z","subjects":[],"languages":["en"],"rights":["In Copyright"],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10919/106253","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.department","label":"Department","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Arnaut, Lynn Y."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2021-10-26T20:10:53Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2021-10-26T20:10:53Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["1983"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.dcmitype","label":"Dc Type Dcmitype","values":["Text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.S."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["In Copyright"]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/106253"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of rating purpose and anonymity on the psychometric characteristics of self-ratings. Employees of the United States Marshals Service rated their proficiency on 66 job-related knowledges and skills, and on overall performance. Instructions stated. that the purpose of the ratings was either administration, research, i.e. training needs assessment. In addition, subjects were either required to sign their names or to remain anonymous. Each employee's immediate supervisor also provided ratings for each subject. Self-rating leniency did not vary as a function of anonymity. Self-ratings made for training purposes were less lenient than ratings made for administration or research. Self-ratings demonstrated less halo than supervisor ratings. In addition, self-ratings exhibited less variance and more leniency than supervisor-ratings. It is suggested that self-ratings may be a useful method of identifying training needs when used in conjunction with supervisory evaluations."]},{"key":"dc:description.degree","label":"Dc Description Degree","values":["M.S."]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The effects of rating purpose and anonymity on self-ratings of ability and performance"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.department":["Psychology"],"dc:creator":["Arnaut, Lynn Y."],"dc:date.accessioned":["2021-10-26T20:10:53Z"],"dc:date.available":["2021-10-26T20:10:53Z"],"dc:date.issued":["1983"],"dc:description.abstract":["The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of rating purpose and anonymity on the psychometric characteristics of self-ratings. Employees of the United States Marshals Service rated their proficiency on 66 job-related knowledges and skills, and on overall performance. Instructions stated. that the purpose of the ratings was either administration, research, i.e. training needs assessment. In addition, subjects were either required to sign their names or to remain anonymous. Each employee's immediate supervisor also provided ratings for each subject. Self-rating leniency did not vary as a function of anonymity. Self-ratings made for training purposes were less lenient than ratings made for administration or research. Self-ratings demonstrated less halo than supervisor ratings. In addition, self-ratings exhibited less variance and more leniency than supervisor-ratings. It is suggested that self-ratings may be a useful method of identifying training needs when used in conjunction with supervisory evaluations."],"dc:description.degree":["M.S."],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10919/106253"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:publisher":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"],"dc:rights":["In Copyright"],"dc:rights.uri":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:title":["The effects of rating purpose and anonymity on self-ratings of ability and performance"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.dcmitype":["Text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.S."],"thesis:institution_name":["Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:20:35Z"}