A critical appraisal of the creditor protective mechanisms under the South African Companies Act 71 of 2008

This research examined the mechanisms that were employed by the Companies Act 71 of 2008 in order to protect the interests of creditors in company affairs. At the preamble of the aforementioned Act lies an undertaking from legislature to provide appropriate redress to investors and third parties/creditors. It was on that basis that the researcher sought to establish whether legislature had indeed fulfilled its commitment to provide appropriate redress to creditors. Traditionally, companies have been run to promote the interests of shareholders with little attention given to the interests of other stakeholders such as creditors. It is this research`s findings that South African company law has moved from the traditional view, that is the shareholder value approach, to the enlightened shareholder value approach: a model of corporate governance which permits directors to have regard, where appropriate, to the interests of other stakeholders but with shareholders’ interests retaining primacy. It is thus found that creditors cannot be protected by contract laws alone but that their protection should be enhanced by mandatory corporate laws which regulates the manner and conduct of company controllers in a way that ensures that the interests of all stakeholders, including creditors, are given due regard. Finally, it has been found that much work has been done by legislature in developing the re-enacted creditor protective mechanisms and also in statutorily adopting new mechanisms which are aimed at advancing creditor interests. Recommendations have thus been made to legislature for possible amendments to refine its corporate laws.

Author dc:creator

• Sibanda, Mandlaenkosi

Advisors dc:contributor.advisor

• Nwafor, A. O.
• Letuka, P.

• Business rescue
• Company
• Company controllers
• Creditors
• Credit Protective mechanisms
• Creditor Compromise
• Corporate Constituencies or Stakeholders
• Directors
• Enforcement mechanisms
• Investors
• Liquidation
• Piercing the corporate veil
• Solvency and liquidity
• Shareholder
• Turquand rule

Statement dc:rights

• University of Venda

Language dc:language.iso

en

Handle dc:identifier.uri

http://hdl.handle.net/11602/1365

OAI identifier oai:identifier

oai:univendspace.univen.ac.za:11602/1365