{"id":{"repo_id":"vcu","oai_identifier":"oai:scholarscompass.vcu.edu:etd-1721"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/vcu/oai:scholarscompass.vcu.edu:etd-1721","repository":{"repo_id":"vcu","name":"Virginia Commonwealth University","base_url":"https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Interobserver Reliability in the Diagnosis of Pulpal and Periradicular Disease","abstract":"The purpose of this study was evaluate the interobserver reliability of endodontists in the diagnosis the presence or absence of pulpal and/or periradicular disease. The study used 47 patients presenting to the VCU School of Dentistry for screening appointments as a test population under the rules and regulations of the VCU IRB. The patients were examined separately by two endodontists, using a thorough patient history, clinical exam, and radiographs. The answer to the question was then answered, does the patient have pulpal and/or periradicular disease, and compared. The data was analyzed using Kappa and the standard error was determined to test for statistical significance. Observers agreed 88% of the time with a Kappa of 0.74. This was determined to represent a bona fide reliability with p<.0001. The results indicate that agreement among endodontists is very good when patients are evaluated for pulpal and/or periradicular disease.","abstract_html":"The purpose of this study was evaluate the interobserver reliability of endodontists in the diagnosis the presence or absence of pulpal and/or periradicular disease. The study used 47 patients presenting to the VCU School of Dentistry for screening appointments as a test population under the rules and regulations of the VCU IRB. The patients were examined separately by two endodontists, using a thorough patient history, clinical exam, and radiographs. The answer to the question was then answered, does the patient have pulpal and/or periradicular disease, and compared. The data was analyzed using Kappa and the standard error was determined to test for statistical significance. Observers agreed 88% of the time with a Kappa of 0.74. This was determined to represent a bona fide reliability with p&lt;.0001. The results indicate that agreement among endodontists is very good when patients are evaluated for pulpal and/or periradicular disease.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Mellin, Todd Peter"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Master of Science","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Endodontics","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Dr. James R. Lance"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2005,"date_issued":"2005-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2005-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:54:21Z","subjects":["observer variability","Dentistry","Endodontics and Endodontology","Medicine and Health Sciences"],"languages":[],"rights":["© The Author"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/722"],"render_values":[{"text":"https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/722","href":"https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/722","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://doi.org/10.25772/8KXR-3V23","outbound_label":"DOI","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Dr. James R. Lance"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Mellin, Todd Peter"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2014-07-09T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Endodontics"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["observer variability","Dentistry","Endodontics and Endodontology","Medicine and Health Sciences"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["© The Author"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://doi.org/10.25772/8KXR-3V23","https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/722"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The purpose of this study was evaluate the interobserver reliability of endodontists in the diagnosis the presence or absence of pulpal and/or periradicular disease. The study used 47 patients presenting to the VCU School of Dentistry for screening appointments as a test population under the rules and regulations of the VCU IRB. The patients were examined separately by two endodontists, using a thorough patient history, clinical exam, and radiographs. The answer to the question was then answered, does the patient have pulpal and/or periradicular disease, and compared. The data was analyzed using Kappa and the standard error was determined to test for statistical significance. Observers agreed 88% of the time with a Kappa of 0.74. This was determined to represent a bona fide reliability with p<.0001. The results indicate that agreement among endodontists is very good when patients are evaluated for pulpal and/or periradicular disease."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Interobserver Reliability in the Diagnosis of Pulpal and Periradicular Disease"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Dr. James R. Lance"],"dc:creator":["Mellin, Todd Peter"],"dc:date.available":["2014-07-09T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["The purpose of this study was evaluate the interobserver reliability of endodontists in the diagnosis the presence or absence of pulpal and/or periradicular disease. The study used 47 patients presenting to the VCU School of Dentistry for screening appointments as a test population under the rules and regulations of the VCU IRB. The patients were examined separately by two endodontists, using a thorough patient history, clinical exam, and radiographs. The answer to the question was then answered, does the patient have pulpal and/or periradicular disease, and compared. The data was analyzed using Kappa and the standard error was determined to test for statistical significance. Observers agreed 88% of the time with a Kappa of 0.74. This was determined to represent a bona fide reliability with p<.0001. The results indicate that agreement among endodontists is very good when patients are evaluated for pulpal and/or periradicular disease."],"dc:identifier":["https://doi.org/10.25772/8KXR-3V23","https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/722"],"dc:rights":["© The Author"],"dc:subject":["observer variability","Dentistry","Endodontics and Endodontology","Medicine and Health Sciences"],"dc:title":["Interobserver Reliability in the Diagnosis of Pulpal and Periradicular Disease"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Endodontics"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:54:21Z"}