{"id":{"repo_id":"uwtsd","oai_identifier":"oai:repository.uwtsd.ac.uk:4228"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uwtsd/oai:repository.uwtsd.ac.uk:4228","repository":{"repo_id":"uwtsd","name":"University of Wales Trinity Saint David","base_url":"https://repository.uwtsd.ac.uk/cgi/oai2"},"display":{"title":"Can Networks and Interactions Help us Understand the Euboian Koinon?","abstract":"The Euboian koinon has been labelled as “irregular” and described as one of the most difficult to understand (Knoepfler, 2015, 158). During the late Classical and Hellenistic eras there were several attempts to establish a koinon on Euboia but almost as soon as our sources mention it we lose all trace of it again. It seems the Euboians could neither form a stable koinon nor refrain from trying. There have been few attempts to explain this situation and most passing comments bring up the island’s fragmented geography and its ethnic divisions. Developments in scholarship, however, challenge these assumptions as the construction of ethnicity and its role in the koinon have been put under scrutiny. Given the limited material we have to discuss the Euboian koinon there is a need for a fresh approach to find any explanation. Network theory and Mackil’s (2013) emphasis on interaction gives us a new way to study the island. By examining the history of the koinon, the role of ethnic identity on Euboia and reconstructing Euboia’s networks of interaction a different image of the island emerges. This first network case study of a regional koinon places a pattern of cooperation and interaction next to that of division and fragmentation. Rather than being an irregular and halting project the Euboian koinon emerges as a response to outside pressures by a group of communities able to mobilise a collective identity. This case study supports the idea that interactions were key to forming the koina (Mackil, 2013) while suggesting that rather than being irregular the Euboians found in their occasional collective actions a level of cooperation to suit their needs.","abstract_html":"The Euboian koinon has been labelled as “irregular” and described as one of the most difficult to understand (Knoepfler, 2015, 158). During the late Classical and Hellenistic eras there were several attempts to establish a koinon on Euboia but almost as soon as our sources mention it we lose all trace of it again. It seems the Euboians could neither form a stable koinon nor refrain from trying. There have been few attempts to explain this situation and most passing comments bring up the island’s fragmented geography and its ethnic divisions. Developments in scholarship, however, challenge these assumptions as the construction of ethnicity and its role in the koinon have been put under scrutiny. Given the limited material we have to discuss the Euboian koinon there is a need for a fresh approach to find any explanation. Network theory and Mackil’s (2013) emphasis on interaction gives us a new way to study the island. By examining the history of the koinon, the role of ethnic identity on Euboia and reconstructing Euboia’s networks of interaction a different image of the island emerges. This first network case study of a regional koinon places a pattern of cooperation and interaction next to that of division and fragmentation. Rather than being an irregular and halting project the Euboian koinon emerges as a response to outside pressures by a group of communities able to mobilise a collective identity. This case study supports the idea that interactions were key to forming the koina (Mackil, 2013) while suggesting that rather than being irregular the Euboians found in their occasional collective actions a level of cooperation to suit their needs.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Middleton, Neil"],"institution":"University of Wales Trinity Saint David","degree_name":"ma","degree_level":"masters","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2021,"date_issued":"2021-06","date_published":"2021-06","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:53:11Z","subjects":["D051 Hanes yr Henfyd","DF Groeg"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.grantnumber","label":"Dc Identifier Grantnumber","values":["UWTSD"],"render_values":[{"text":"UWTSD","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://doi.org/10.82227/repository.uwtsd.ac.uk.00004228","outbound_label":"DOI","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.doi"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.sponsor","label":"Sponsor","values":["University of Wales Trinity Saint David"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Middleton, Neil"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2021-06-23"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2021-06"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.commercial","label":"Dc Publisher Commercial","values":["University of Wales Trinity Saint David"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.department","label":"Dc Publisher Department","values":["Traethodau Meistr","Institute of Education and Humanities: Humanities and Social Sciences"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["University of Wales Trinity Saint David"]},{"key":"dc:relation.isreferencedby","label":"Dc Relation Isreferencedby","values":["https://repository.uwtsd.ac.uk/id/eprint/4228/"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Gosodiad"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["masters"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationname","label":"Dc Type Qualificationname","values":["ma"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["D051 Hanes yr Henfyd","DF Groeg"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["10.82227/repository.uwtsd.ac.uk.00004228"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.grantnumber","label":"Dc Identifier Grantnumber","values":["UWTSD"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://repository.uwtsd.ac.uk/id/eprint/4228/1/Middleton_N_MA_Thesis.pdf"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The Euboian koinon has been labelled as “irregular” and described as one of the most difficult to understand (Knoepfler, 2015, 158). During the late Classical and Hellenistic eras there were several attempts to establish a koinon on Euboia but almost as soon as our sources mention it we lose all trace of it again. It seems the Euboians could neither form a stable koinon nor refrain from trying. There have been few attempts to explain this situation and most passing comments bring up the island’s fragmented geography and its ethnic divisions. Developments in scholarship, however, challenge these assumptions as the construction of ethnicity and its role in the koinon have been put under scrutiny. Given the limited material we have to discuss the Euboian koinon there is a need for a fresh approach to find any explanation. Network theory and Mackil’s (2013) emphasis on interaction gives us a new way to study the island. By examining the history of the koinon, the role of ethnic identity on Euboia and reconstructing Euboia’s networks of interaction a different image of the island emerges. This first network case study of a regional koinon places a pattern of cooperation and interaction next to that of division and fragmentation. Rather than being an irregular and halting project the Euboian koinon emerges as a response to outside pressures by a group of communities able to mobilise a collective identity. This case study supports the idea that interactions were key to forming the koina (Mackil, 2013) while suggesting that rather than being irregular the Euboians found in their occasional collective actions a level of cooperation to suit their needs."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["text"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Can Networks and Interactions Help us Understand the Euboian Koinon?"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.sponsor":["University of Wales Trinity Saint David"],"dc:creator":["Middleton, Neil"],"dc:date":["2021-06-23"],"dc:date.issued":["2021-06"],"dc:description.abstract":["The Euboian koinon has been labelled as “irregular” and described as one of the most difficult to understand (Knoepfler, 2015, 158). During the late Classical and Hellenistic eras there were several attempts to establish a koinon on Euboia but almost as soon as our sources mention it we lose all trace of it again. It seems the Euboians could neither form a stable koinon nor refrain from trying. There have been few attempts to explain this situation and most passing comments bring up the island’s fragmented geography and its ethnic divisions. Developments in scholarship, however, challenge these assumptions as the construction of ethnicity and its role in the koinon have been put under scrutiny. Given the limited material we have to discuss the Euboian koinon there is a need for a fresh approach to find any explanation. Network theory and Mackil’s (2013) emphasis on interaction gives us a new way to study the island. By examining the history of the koinon, the role of ethnic identity on Euboia and reconstructing Euboia’s networks of interaction a different image of the island emerges. This first network case study of a regional koinon places a pattern of cooperation and interaction next to that of division and fragmentation. Rather than being an irregular and halting project the Euboian koinon emerges as a response to outside pressures by a group of communities able to mobilise a collective identity. This case study supports the idea that interactions were key to forming the koina (Mackil, 2013) while suggesting that rather than being irregular the Euboians found in their occasional collective actions a level of cooperation to suit their needs."],"dc:format":["text"],"dc:identifier.doi":["10.82227/repository.uwtsd.ac.uk.00004228"],"dc:identifier.grantnumber":["UWTSD"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://repository.uwtsd.ac.uk/id/eprint/4228/1/Middleton_N_MA_Thesis.pdf"],"dc:publisher.commercial":["University of Wales Trinity Saint David"],"dc:publisher.department":["Traethodau Meistr","Institute of Education and Humanities: Humanities and Social Sciences"],"dc:publisher.institution":["University of Wales Trinity Saint David"],"dc:relation.isreferencedby":["https://repository.uwtsd.ac.uk/id/eprint/4228/"],"dc:subject":["D051 Hanes yr Henfyd","DF Groeg"],"dc:title":["Can Networks and Interactions Help us Understand the Euboian Koinon?"],"dc:type":["Gosodiad"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["masters"],"dc:type.qualificationname":["ma"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:53:11Z"}