{"id":{"repo_id":"uwtsd","oai_identifier":"oai:repository.uwtsd.ac.uk:4117"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uwtsd/oai:repository.uwtsd.ac.uk:4117","repository":{"repo_id":"uwtsd","name":"University of Wales Trinity Saint David","base_url":"https://repository.uwtsd.ac.uk/cgi/oai2"},"display":{"title":"Materialising Power: The Role of looted European Cultural Objects in Nazi Elite Self-fashioning","abstract":"This dissertation examines how Nazi elites instrumentalised looted cultural objects as tools of power, ideology, and self-fashioning. It argues that looting was not a by-product of war but a deliberate strategy central to Nazi cultural policy, disguising theft as legality while reinforcing the regime’s symbolic authority. Focusing on Adolf Hitler, Hermann Göring, and Heinrich Himmler, the study reveals how each leader used material culture differently. For Hitler, imperial regalia and funerary remains constructed a mythic narrative of German continuity, legitimising his role as heir to imperial tradition. Göring transformed his estate, Carinhall, into both a private collection and a projection of cultural authority, aligning with Nazi aesthetics while pursuing personal wealth. Himmler employed religious relics and artefacts to promote a mythic Aryan prehistory, legitimising the SS as both racial forerunner and spiritual order. Using an interdisciplinary approach, archival research, art history, biography, and material culture studies, the dissertation situates these practices within broader institutions such as the Reichskulturkammer, the Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg, and the Ahnenerbe. It concludes that material culture was an active force in Nazi Germany: legitimising authority, reinforcing ideology, and elevating leaders, while also serving emotive ambitions of prestige, rivalry, and personal gain.","abstract_html":"This dissertation examines how Nazi elites instrumentalised looted cultural objects as tools of power, ideology, and self-fashioning. It argues that looting was not a by-product of war but a deliberate strategy central to Nazi cultural policy, disguising theft as legality while reinforcing the regime’s symbolic authority. Focusing on Adolf Hitler, Hermann Göring, and Heinrich Himmler, the study reveals how each leader used material culture differently. For Hitler, imperial regalia and funerary remains constructed a mythic narrative of German continuity, legitimising his role as heir to imperial tradition. Göring transformed his estate, Carinhall, into both a private collection and a projection of cultural authority, aligning with Nazi aesthetics while pursuing personal wealth. Himmler employed religious relics and artefacts to promote a mythic Aryan prehistory, legitimising the SS as both racial forerunner and spiritual order. Using an interdisciplinary approach, archival research, art history, biography, and material culture studies, the dissertation situates these practices within broader institutions such as the Reichskulturkammer, the Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg, and the Ahnenerbe. It concludes that material culture was an active force in Nazi Germany: legitimising authority, reinforcing ideology, and elevating leaders, while also serving emotive ambitions of prestige, rivalry, and personal gain.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Owen, Rachel"],"institution":"University of Wales Trinity Saint David","degree_name":"ma","degree_level":"masters","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2025,"date_issued":"2025-12","date_published":"2025-12","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:53:11Z","subjects":["DD Yr Almaen","NX Celfyddydau yn gyffredinol"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.grantnumber","label":"Dc Identifier Grantnumber","values":["UWTSD"],"render_values":[{"text":"UWTSD","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://doi.org/10.82227/repository.uwtsd.ac.uk.00004117","outbound_label":"DOI","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.doi"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.sponsor","label":"Sponsor","values":["University of Wales Trinity Saint David"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Owen, Rachel"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2025-12-08"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2025-12"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.commercial","label":"Dc Publisher Commercial","values":["University of Wales Trinity Saint David"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.department","label":"Dc Publisher Department","values":["Traethodau Meistr","Institute of Education and Humanities: Humanities and Social Sciences"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["University of Wales Trinity Saint David"]},{"key":"dc:relation.isreferencedby","label":"Dc Relation Isreferencedby","values":["https://repository.uwtsd.ac.uk/id/eprint/4117/"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Gosodiad"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["masters"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationname","label":"Dc Type Qualificationname","values":["ma"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["DD Yr Almaen","NX Celfyddydau yn gyffredinol"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["10.82227/repository.uwtsd.ac.uk.00004117"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.grantnumber","label":"Dc Identifier Grantnumber","values":["UWTSD"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://repository.uwtsd.ac.uk/id/eprint/4117/1/Owen_R_MA_Thesis.pdf"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This dissertation examines how Nazi elites instrumentalised looted cultural objects as tools of power, ideology, and self-fashioning. It argues that looting was not a by-product of war but a deliberate strategy central to Nazi cultural policy, disguising theft as legality while reinforcing the regime’s symbolic authority. Focusing on Adolf Hitler, Hermann Göring, and Heinrich Himmler, the study reveals how each leader used material culture differently. For Hitler, imperial regalia and funerary remains constructed a mythic narrative of German continuity, legitimising his role as heir to imperial tradition. Göring transformed his estate, Carinhall, into both a private collection and a projection of cultural authority, aligning with Nazi aesthetics while pursuing personal wealth. Himmler employed religious relics and artefacts to promote a mythic Aryan prehistory, legitimising the SS as both racial forerunner and spiritual order. Using an interdisciplinary approach, archival research, art history, biography, and material culture studies, the dissertation situates these practices within broader institutions such as the Reichskulturkammer, the Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg, and the Ahnenerbe. It concludes that material culture was an active force in Nazi Germany: legitimising authority, reinforcing ideology, and elevating leaders, while also serving emotive ambitions of prestige, rivalry, and personal gain."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["text"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Materialising Power: The Role of looted European Cultural Objects in Nazi Elite Self-fashioning"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.sponsor":["University of Wales Trinity Saint David"],"dc:creator":["Owen, Rachel"],"dc:date":["2025-12-08"],"dc:date.issued":["2025-12"],"dc:description.abstract":["This dissertation examines how Nazi elites instrumentalised looted cultural objects as tools of power, ideology, and self-fashioning. It argues that looting was not a by-product of war but a deliberate strategy central to Nazi cultural policy, disguising theft as legality while reinforcing the regime’s symbolic authority. Focusing on Adolf Hitler, Hermann Göring, and Heinrich Himmler, the study reveals how each leader used material culture differently. For Hitler, imperial regalia and funerary remains constructed a mythic narrative of German continuity, legitimising his role as heir to imperial tradition. Göring transformed his estate, Carinhall, into both a private collection and a projection of cultural authority, aligning with Nazi aesthetics while pursuing personal wealth. Himmler employed religious relics and artefacts to promote a mythic Aryan prehistory, legitimising the SS as both racial forerunner and spiritual order. Using an interdisciplinary approach, archival research, art history, biography, and material culture studies, the dissertation situates these practices within broader institutions such as the Reichskulturkammer, the Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg, and the Ahnenerbe. It concludes that material culture was an active force in Nazi Germany: legitimising authority, reinforcing ideology, and elevating leaders, while also serving emotive ambitions of prestige, rivalry, and personal gain."],"dc:format":["text"],"dc:identifier.doi":["10.82227/repository.uwtsd.ac.uk.00004117"],"dc:identifier.grantnumber":["UWTSD"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://repository.uwtsd.ac.uk/id/eprint/4117/1/Owen_R_MA_Thesis.pdf"],"dc:publisher.commercial":["University of Wales Trinity Saint David"],"dc:publisher.department":["Traethodau Meistr","Institute of Education and Humanities: Humanities and Social Sciences"],"dc:publisher.institution":["University of Wales Trinity Saint David"],"dc:relation.isreferencedby":["https://repository.uwtsd.ac.uk/id/eprint/4117/"],"dc:subject":["DD Yr Almaen","NX Celfyddydau yn gyffredinol"],"dc:title":["Materialising Power: The Role of looted European Cultural Objects in Nazi Elite Self-fashioning"],"dc:type":["Gosodiad"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["masters"],"dc:type.qualificationname":["ma"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:53:11Z"}