{"id":{"repo_id":"uwtsd","oai_identifier":"oai:repository.uwtsd.ac.uk:4043"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uwtsd/oai:repository.uwtsd.ac.uk:4043","repository":{"repo_id":"uwtsd","name":"University of Wales Trinity Saint David","base_url":"https://repository.uwtsd.ac.uk/cgi/oai2"},"display":{"title":"The Feasibility of Adopting A Hydrogen Powered Fleet of Vehicles","abstract":"This study assessed whether a UK depot could convert a 20-truck, back to base fleet from diesel to hydrogen while meeting strict service, safety, reliability, cost, and emissions thresholds. The duty was fixed at 6,000 miles per day across two return peaks. Using published energy rates, daily hydrogen need was sized at 882 kg for typical days and 1,206 kg for stress duty; a 20% buffer for heat, clustering, and timing drift raised these to 1,058 kg and 1,447 kg. SAE J2601 limits, a two-wave queue model, and evidence on pre-cooling bottlenecks guided dispenser count, storage, and chiller sizing. Availability targets used predictive health monitoring to reach at least 97% during operating windows. Layout checks followed recognised siting rules. Three supply routes were tested: onsite PEM electrolysis, buy-in compressed or liquid hydrogen, and a hybrid with onsite baseload plus delivered peaks. Onsite gave strong control over purity and timing but exposed cost to power price and stack ageing. Buy-in lowered capital but imported delivery and price risk and still required robust station conditioning. The hybrid right-sized onsite production to about 60–70% of a hot-day load and used contracted deliveries to cover peaks and outages. The hybrid met wait targets (mean ≤10 minutes; P95 ≤20 minutes) more reliably at the study depot and sat mid-range on cost, while emissions results depended on the supply pathway and verified certificates. The study therefore recommended a hybrid baseline with firm clean-power contracts, supplier redundancy, multi-bank storage, strong pre-cooling, inline impurity monitoring, and simple queue controls throughout.","abstract_html":"This study assessed whether a UK depot could convert a 20-truck, back to base fleet from diesel to hydrogen while meeting strict service, safety, reliability, cost, and emissions thresholds. The duty was fixed at 6,000 miles per day across two return peaks. Using published energy rates, daily hydrogen need was sized at 882 kg for typical days and 1,206 kg for stress duty; a 20% buffer for heat, clustering, and timing drift raised these to 1,058 kg and 1,447 kg. SAE J2601 limits, a two-wave queue model, and evidence on pre-cooling bottlenecks guided dispenser count, storage, and chiller sizing. Availability targets used predictive health monitoring to reach at least 97% during operating windows. Layout checks followed recognised siting rules. Three supply routes were tested: onsite PEM electrolysis, buy-in compressed or liquid hydrogen, and a hybrid with onsite baseload plus delivered peaks. Onsite gave strong control over purity and timing but exposed cost to power price and stack ageing. Buy-in lowered capital but imported delivery and price risk and still required robust station conditioning. The hybrid right-sized onsite production to about 60–70% of a hot-day load and used contracted deliveries to cover peaks and outages. The hybrid met wait targets (mean ≤10 minutes; P95 ≤20 minutes) more reliably at the study depot and sat mid-range on cost, while emissions results depended on the supply pathway and verified certificates. The study therefore recommended a hybrid baseline with firm clean-power contracts, supplier redundancy, multi-bank storage, strong pre-cooling, inline impurity monitoring, and simple queue controls throughout.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Asowata, Efehi Davidson"],"institution":"University of Wales Trinity Saint David","degree_name":"msc","degree_level":"masters","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2025,"date_issued":"2025-11","date_published":"2025-11","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:53:08Z","subjects":["TL Cerbydau modur. Awyrenneg. Astronawteg"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.grantnumber","label":"Dc Identifier Grantnumber","values":["UWTSD"],"render_values":[{"text":"UWTSD","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://doi.org/10.82227/repository.uwtsd.ac.uk.00004043","outbound_label":"DOI","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.doi"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.sponsor","label":"Sponsor","values":["University of Wales Trinity Saint David"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Asowata, Efehi Davidson"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2025-11-03"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2025-11"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.commercial","label":"Dc Publisher Commercial","values":["University of Wales Trinity Saint David"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.department","label":"Dc Publisher Department","values":["Traethodau Meistr","Wales Institute for Science and Art: Engineering"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["University of Wales Trinity Saint David"]},{"key":"dc:relation.isreferencedby","label":"Dc Relation Isreferencedby","values":["https://repository.uwtsd.ac.uk/id/eprint/4043/"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Gosodiad"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["masters"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationname","label":"Dc Type Qualificationname","values":["msc"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["TL Cerbydau modur. Awyrenneg. Astronawteg"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["10.82227/repository.uwtsd.ac.uk.00004043"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.grantnumber","label":"Dc Identifier Grantnumber","values":["UWTSD"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://repository.uwtsd.ac.uk/id/eprint/4043/1/Asowata_ED_MSc_Thesis.pdf"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This study assessed whether a UK depot could convert a 20-truck, back to base fleet from diesel to hydrogen while meeting strict service, safety, reliability, cost, and emissions thresholds. The duty was fixed at 6,000 miles per day across two return peaks. Using published energy rates, daily hydrogen need was sized at 882 kg for typical days and 1,206 kg for stress duty; a 20% buffer for heat, clustering, and timing drift raised these to 1,058 kg and 1,447 kg. SAE J2601 limits, a two-wave queue model, and evidence on pre-cooling bottlenecks guided dispenser count, storage, and chiller sizing. Availability targets used predictive health monitoring to reach at least 97% during operating windows. Layout checks followed recognised siting rules. Three supply routes were tested: onsite PEM electrolysis, buy-in compressed or liquid hydrogen, and a hybrid with onsite baseload plus delivered peaks. Onsite gave strong control over purity and timing but exposed cost to power price and stack ageing. Buy-in lowered capital but imported delivery and price risk and still required robust station conditioning. The hybrid right-sized onsite production to about 60–70% of a hot-day load and used contracted deliveries to cover peaks and outages. The hybrid met wait targets (mean ≤10 minutes; P95 ≤20 minutes) more reliably at the study depot and sat mid-range on cost, while emissions results depended on the supply pathway and verified certificates. The study therefore recommended a hybrid baseline with firm clean-power contracts, supplier redundancy, multi-bank storage, strong pre-cooling, inline impurity monitoring, and simple queue controls throughout."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["text"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Feasibility of Adopting A Hydrogen Powered Fleet of Vehicles"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.sponsor":["University of Wales Trinity Saint David"],"dc:creator":["Asowata, Efehi Davidson"],"dc:date":["2025-11-03"],"dc:date.issued":["2025-11"],"dc:description.abstract":["This study assessed whether a UK depot could convert a 20-truck, back to base fleet from diesel to hydrogen while meeting strict service, safety, reliability, cost, and emissions thresholds. The duty was fixed at 6,000 miles per day across two return peaks. Using published energy rates, daily hydrogen need was sized at 882 kg for typical days and 1,206 kg for stress duty; a 20% buffer for heat, clustering, and timing drift raised these to 1,058 kg and 1,447 kg. SAE J2601 limits, a two-wave queue model, and evidence on pre-cooling bottlenecks guided dispenser count, storage, and chiller sizing. Availability targets used predictive health monitoring to reach at least 97% during operating windows. Layout checks followed recognised siting rules. Three supply routes were tested: onsite PEM electrolysis, buy-in compressed or liquid hydrogen, and a hybrid with onsite baseload plus delivered peaks. Onsite gave strong control over purity and timing but exposed cost to power price and stack ageing. Buy-in lowered capital but imported delivery and price risk and still required robust station conditioning. The hybrid right-sized onsite production to about 60–70% of a hot-day load and used contracted deliveries to cover peaks and outages. The hybrid met wait targets (mean ≤10 minutes; P95 ≤20 minutes) more reliably at the study depot and sat mid-range on cost, while emissions results depended on the supply pathway and verified certificates. The study therefore recommended a hybrid baseline with firm clean-power contracts, supplier redundancy, multi-bank storage, strong pre-cooling, inline impurity monitoring, and simple queue controls throughout."],"dc:format":["text"],"dc:identifier.doi":["10.82227/repository.uwtsd.ac.uk.00004043"],"dc:identifier.grantnumber":["UWTSD"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://repository.uwtsd.ac.uk/id/eprint/4043/1/Asowata_ED_MSc_Thesis.pdf"],"dc:publisher.commercial":["University of Wales Trinity Saint David"],"dc:publisher.department":["Traethodau Meistr","Wales Institute for Science and Art: Engineering"],"dc:publisher.institution":["University of Wales Trinity Saint David"],"dc:relation.isreferencedby":["https://repository.uwtsd.ac.uk/id/eprint/4043/"],"dc:subject":["TL Cerbydau modur. Awyrenneg. Astronawteg"],"dc:title":["The Feasibility of Adopting A Hydrogen Powered Fleet of Vehicles"],"dc:type":["Gosodiad"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["masters"],"dc:type.qualificationname":["msc"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:53:08Z"}