{"id":{"repo_id":"uwtsd","oai_identifier":"oai:repository.uwtsd.ac.uk:3072"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uwtsd/oai:repository.uwtsd.ac.uk:3072","repository":{"repo_id":"uwtsd","name":"University of Wales Trinity Saint David","base_url":"https://repository.uwtsd.ac.uk/cgi/oai2"},"display":{"title":"Anti-Judaism in John’s Gospel: Catholic perspectives after Vatican II Council (1962-65 CE)","abstract":"Five research questions form the framework of this thesis: Is the Fourth Gospel anti-Jewish? Who are ‘the Jews’ in John’s Gospel? Does John’s Gospel reflect conflict between the Johannine community and ‘the Jews’? Is there a supersessionist Christology in John? And can certain hermeneutical reading strategies contribute to an understanding of anti-Judaism in John? In chapter 2 historical contexts underpinning anti-Judaism are discussed. Catholic biblical scholarship before Vatican II Council is outlined, followed by a discussion of Vatican II Council, and a discussion of key Council documents: Nostra Aetate/In Our Time and Dei Verbum/Word of God, which influenced attitudes to the Jews and biblical scholarship respectively. On anti-Judaism, positive or negative answers depend on interpretation of particular contexts and the approach of commentators to the text. The declaration at John 8:44 that the devil is the father of the Jews can be read as part of standard rhetorical language of the time and not as modern hate speech. Examples of negative Jewish characterization from the mid-nineteenth to mid-twentieth century are therefore given in chapter 3. Leading Catholic scholars, Brown, Moloney and Schnackenburg commented negatively on the Jews in their early works but Brown changed his stance in later years. The identity of ‘the Jews’ is explored and, again, context is important. Catholic commentators, particularly Brown, distinguish between the various referents of the term. Chapter 4 then considers the existence of a Johannine community and its contribution to anti-Judaism. Supersessionism and its vestigial presence today, and the contribution of hermeneutics to an understanding of John’s Gospel are discussed. Conclusions are presented in chapter 5 of the dissertation. Catholic exegetes are now part of mainstream biblical scholarship and there is no particular Catholic angle to their contributions to anti-Judaism in John’s Gospel.","abstract_html":"Five research questions form the framework of this thesis: Is the Fourth Gospel anti-Jewish? Who are ‘the Jews’ in John’s Gospel? Does John’s Gospel reflect conflict between the Johannine community and ‘the Jews’? Is there a supersessionist Christology in John? And can certain hermeneutical reading strategies contribute to an understanding of anti-Judaism in John? In chapter 2 historical contexts underpinning anti-Judaism are discussed. Catholic biblical scholarship before Vatican II Council is outlined, followed by a discussion of Vatican II Council, and a discussion of key Council documents: Nostra Aetate/In Our Time and Dei Verbum/Word of God, which influenced attitudes to the Jews and biblical scholarship respectively. On anti-Judaism, positive or negative answers depend on interpretation of particular contexts and the approach of commentators to the text. The declaration at John 8:44 that the devil is the father of the Jews can be read as part of standard rhetorical language of the time and not as modern hate speech. Examples of negative Jewish characterization from the mid-nineteenth to mid-twentieth century are therefore given in chapter 3. Leading Catholic scholars, Brown, Moloney and Schnackenburg commented negatively on the Jews in their early works but Brown changed his stance in later years. The identity of ‘the Jews’ is explored and, again, context is important. Catholic commentators, particularly Brown, distinguish between the various referents of the term. Chapter 4 then considers the existence of a Johannine community and its contribution to anti-Judaism. Supersessionism and its vestigial presence today, and the contribution of hermeneutics to an understanding of John’s Gospel are discussed. Conclusions are presented in chapter 5 of the dissertation. Catholic exegetes are now part of mainstream biblical scholarship and there is no particular Catholic angle to their contributions to anti-Judaism in John’s Gospel.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Norton, Tom"],"institution":"University of Wales Trinity Saint David","degree_name":"mres","degree_level":"masters","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2024,"date_issued":"2024-07","date_published":"2024-07","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:53:02Z","subjects":["BS Y Beibl"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.grantnumber","label":"Dc Identifier Grantnumber","values":["UWTSD"],"render_values":[{"text":"UWTSD","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://doi.org/10.82227/repository.uwtsd.ac.uk.00003072","outbound_label":"DOI","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.doi"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.sponsor","label":"Sponsor","values":["University of Wales Trinity Saint David"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Norton, Tom"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2024-07-01"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2024-07"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.commercial","label":"Dc Publisher Commercial","values":["University of Wales Trinity Saint David"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.department","label":"Dc Publisher Department","values":["Traethodau Meistr","Institute of Education and Humanities"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["University of Wales Trinity Saint David"]},{"key":"dc:relation.isreferencedby","label":"Dc Relation Isreferencedby","values":["https://repository.uwtsd.ac.uk/id/eprint/3072/"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Gosodiad"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["masters"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationname","label":"Dc Type Qualificationname","values":["mres"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["BS Y Beibl"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["10.82227/repository.uwtsd.ac.uk.00003072"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.grantnumber","label":"Dc Identifier Grantnumber","values":["UWTSD"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://repository.uwtsd.ac.uk/id/eprint/3072/1/3072%20Norton%2C%20T.%20%282024%29%20Anti-Judaism%20in%20John%E2%80%99s%20Gospel.pdf"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Five research questions form the framework of this thesis: Is the Fourth Gospel anti-Jewish? Who are ‘the Jews’ in John’s Gospel? Does John’s Gospel reflect conflict between the Johannine community and ‘the Jews’? Is there a supersessionist Christology in John? And can certain hermeneutical reading strategies contribute to an understanding of anti-Judaism in John? In chapter 2 historical contexts underpinning anti-Judaism are discussed. Catholic biblical scholarship before Vatican II Council is outlined, followed by a discussion of Vatican II Council, and a discussion of key Council documents: Nostra Aetate/In Our Time and Dei Verbum/Word of God, which influenced attitudes to the Jews and biblical scholarship respectively. On anti-Judaism, positive or negative answers depend on interpretation of particular contexts and the approach of commentators to the text. The declaration at John 8:44 that the devil is the father of the Jews can be read as part of standard rhetorical language of the time and not as modern hate speech. Examples of negative Jewish characterization from the mid-nineteenth to mid-twentieth century are therefore given in chapter 3. Leading Catholic scholars, Brown, Moloney and Schnackenburg commented negatively on the Jews in their early works but Brown changed his stance in later years. The identity of ‘the Jews’ is explored and, again, context is important. Catholic commentators, particularly Brown, distinguish between the various referents of the term. Chapter 4 then considers the existence of a Johannine community and its contribution to anti-Judaism. Supersessionism and its vestigial presence today, and the contribution of hermeneutics to an understanding of John’s Gospel are discussed. Conclusions are presented in chapter 5 of the dissertation. Catholic exegetes are now part of mainstream biblical scholarship and there is no particular Catholic angle to their contributions to anti-Judaism in John’s Gospel."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["text"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Anti-Judaism in John’s Gospel: Catholic perspectives after Vatican II Council (1962-65 CE)"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.sponsor":["University of Wales Trinity Saint David"],"dc:creator":["Norton, Tom"],"dc:date":["2024-07-01"],"dc:date.issued":["2024-07"],"dc:description.abstract":["Five research questions form the framework of this thesis: Is the Fourth Gospel anti-Jewish? Who are ‘the Jews’ in John’s Gospel? Does John’s Gospel reflect conflict between the Johannine community and ‘the Jews’? Is there a supersessionist Christology in John? And can certain hermeneutical reading strategies contribute to an understanding of anti-Judaism in John? In chapter 2 historical contexts underpinning anti-Judaism are discussed. Catholic biblical scholarship before Vatican II Council is outlined, followed by a discussion of Vatican II Council, and a discussion of key Council documents: Nostra Aetate/In Our Time and Dei Verbum/Word of God, which influenced attitudes to the Jews and biblical scholarship respectively. On anti-Judaism, positive or negative answers depend on interpretation of particular contexts and the approach of commentators to the text. The declaration at John 8:44 that the devil is the father of the Jews can be read as part of standard rhetorical language of the time and not as modern hate speech. Examples of negative Jewish characterization from the mid-nineteenth to mid-twentieth century are therefore given in chapter 3. Leading Catholic scholars, Brown, Moloney and Schnackenburg commented negatively on the Jews in their early works but Brown changed his stance in later years. The identity of ‘the Jews’ is explored and, again, context is important. Catholic commentators, particularly Brown, distinguish between the various referents of the term. Chapter 4 then considers the existence of a Johannine community and its contribution to anti-Judaism. Supersessionism and its vestigial presence today, and the contribution of hermeneutics to an understanding of John’s Gospel are discussed. Conclusions are presented in chapter 5 of the dissertation. Catholic exegetes are now part of mainstream biblical scholarship and there is no particular Catholic angle to their contributions to anti-Judaism in John’s Gospel."],"dc:format":["text"],"dc:identifier.doi":["10.82227/repository.uwtsd.ac.uk.00003072"],"dc:identifier.grantnumber":["UWTSD"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://repository.uwtsd.ac.uk/id/eprint/3072/1/3072%20Norton%2C%20T.%20%282024%29%20Anti-Judaism%20in%20John%E2%80%99s%20Gospel.pdf"],"dc:publisher.commercial":["University of Wales Trinity Saint David"],"dc:publisher.department":["Traethodau Meistr","Institute of Education and Humanities"],"dc:publisher.institution":["University of Wales Trinity Saint David"],"dc:relation.isreferencedby":["https://repository.uwtsd.ac.uk/id/eprint/3072/"],"dc:subject":["BS Y Beibl"],"dc:title":["Anti-Judaism in John’s Gospel: Catholic perspectives after Vatican II Council (1962-65 CE)"],"dc:type":["Gosodiad"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["masters"],"dc:type.qualificationname":["mres"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:53:02Z"}