Back to results

The University of Western Ontario

Does Empirical Moral Psychology Rest on a Mistake? Understanding Theories About the Nature of Moral Judgment as Moral Propositions

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

The main goal of this dissertation is to develop and defend the thesis that theories about the nature of moral judgment must be understood as carrying moral commitments. This has profound consequences for the methodology of metaethics. Specifically, it implies that theories about the nature of moral judgment cannot be understood as empirical hypotheses. There have historically been many attempts to develop a philosophically satisfying theory that characterizes the nature and content of moral judgments. Many philosophers have thought that such theories are best understood as morally neutral hypotheses about human psychology. Recently, a number of philosophers have attempted to approach this question by treating theories about the nature of moral judgment as empirical hypotheses that can be confirmed or disconfirmed by psychological and neuroscientific evidence. I argue that this methodological presupposition is mistaken. In the first and second chapter, I articulate and defend a test for identifying moral propositions and use it to demonstrate that a number of prominent metaethicists have mistakenly thought that theories about the nature of moral judgment are morally neutral. The third chapter begins with an argument that moral propositions cannot be identical to or definable in terms of empirically-confirmable hypotheses. I then show that this conclusion undermines several empirically-informed theories of moral judgment put forward by Shaun Nichols, Jesse Prinz, and Richard Joyce.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Ph D
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Philosophy
Grantor dc:publisher
The University of Western Ontario
Year dc:date.issued
2012

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Clipsham, Patrick
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Skelton, Anthony

Subjects

dc:subject × 4

Rights

Language dc:language.iso
en_ca

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:uwo.scholaris.ca:20.500.14721/30853

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Western University
Base URL
uwo.scholaris.ca/server/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-27
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Clipsham, Patrick. Does Empirical Moral Psychology Rest on a Mistake? Understanding Theories About the Nature of Moral Judgment as Moral Propositions. The University of Western Ontario, 2012. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14721/30853