{"id":{"repo_id":"uvic","oai_identifier":"oai:dspace.library.uvic.ca:1828/2829"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uvic/oai:dspace.library.uvic.ca:1828/2829","repository":{"repo_id":"uvic","name":"University of Victoria (Canada)","base_url":"https://dspace.library.uvic.ca/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"A practiced-informed critique of technological posthumanism and its ideologies","abstract":"With the recent emergence of copious and diverse scholarship that considers the discursive valence of the term \"human\", posthumanism has emerged as a timely and powerful interdisciplinary discourse. This study is a critical analysis of three dominant strains of the technologically oriented segment of this discourse; namely \"scientific\" (Ollivier Dyens), \"humanist\" (N. Katherine Hayles), and \"organismic\" (Mark B. N. Hansen) constructions of technological posthumanism. In each case, the study desublimates (and often deconstructs) the particular ideological claims that underwrite a given perspective, emphasizing the specific elements that such presumptions enable or foreclose. To this end, particular emphasis is given throughout the essay to the critical capacity of performativity, a perspective that is enacted through analyses of selected new media artworks.","abstract_html":"With the recent emergence of copious and diverse scholarship that considers the discursive valence of the term "human", posthumanism has emerged as a timely and powerful interdisciplinary discourse. This study is a critical analysis of three dominant strains of the technologically oriented segment of this discourse; namely "scientific" (Ollivier Dyens), "humanist" (N. Katherine Hayles), and "organismic" (Mark B. N. Hansen) constructions of technological posthumanism. In each case, the study desublimates (and often deconstructs) the particular ideological claims that underwrite a given perspective, emphasizing the specific elements that such presumptions enable or foreclose. To this end, particular emphasis is given throughout the essay to the critical capacity of performativity, a perspective that is enacted through analyses of selected new media artworks.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Cecchetto, David"],"institution":null,"degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Ross, Stephen","Gibson, Steve"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2010,"date_issued":"2010-06-02T16:11:43Z","date_published":"2010-06-02T16:11:43Z","updated_at":"2026-08-21T16:50:31Z","subjects":["posthumanism","technology and culture","art and technology","deconstruction","aesthetics","media art"],"languages":["en","English"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/1828/2829","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"source_record":{"url":"https://dspace.library.uvic.ca/server/oai/request?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=dim&identifier=oai%3Adspace.library.uvic.ca%3A1828%2F2829","prefix":"dim"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.supervisor","label":"Supervisor","values":["Ross, Stephen","Gibson, Steve"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Cecchetto, David"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2010-06-02T16:11:43Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2010-06-02T16:11:43Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2010-06-02T16:11:43Z"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["posthumanism","technology and culture","art and technology","deconstruction","aesthetics","media art"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]},{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/1828/2829"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["With the recent emergence of copious and diverse scholarship that considers the discursive valence of the term \"human\", posthumanism has emerged as a timely and powerful interdisciplinary discourse. This study is a critical analysis of three dominant strains of the technologically oriented segment of this discourse; namely \"scientific\" (Ollivier Dyens), \"humanist\" (N. Katherine Hayles), and \"organismic\" (Mark B. N. Hansen) constructions of technological posthumanism. In each case, the study desublimates (and often deconstructs) the particular ideological claims that underwrite a given perspective, emphasizing the specific elements that such presumptions enable or foreclose. To this end, particular emphasis is given throughout the essay to the critical capacity of performativity, a perspective that is enacted through analyses of selected new media artworks."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["A practiced-informed critique of technological posthumanism and its ideologies"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.supervisor":["Ross, Stephen","Gibson, Steve"],"dc:creator":["Cecchetto, David"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2010-06-02T16:11:43Z"],"dc:date.available":["2010-06-02T16:11:43Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2010-06-02T16:11:43Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["With the recent emergence of copious and diverse scholarship that considers the discursive valence of the term \"human\", posthumanism has emerged as a timely and powerful interdisciplinary discourse. This study is a critical analysis of three dominant strains of the technologically oriented segment of this discourse; namely \"scientific\" (Ollivier Dyens), \"humanist\" (N. Katherine Hayles), and \"organismic\" (Mark B. N. Hansen) constructions of technological posthumanism. In each case, the study desublimates (and often deconstructs) the particular ideological claims that underwrite a given perspective, emphasizing the specific elements that such presumptions enable or foreclose. To this end, particular emphasis is given throughout the essay to the critical capacity of performativity, a perspective that is enacted through analyses of selected new media artworks."],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/1828/2829"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:subject":["posthumanism","technology and culture","art and technology","deconstruction","aesthetics","media art"],"dc:title":["A practiced-informed critique of technological posthumanism and its ideologies"],"dc:type":["Thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-08-21T16:50:31Z"}