Biomedicalizing Risk: Technologies of HIV Prevention and the Moral Imperatives of Biological Citizenship

This thesis examines the history and social implications of the rapid self-test for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in the United States. Via a discursive analysis of literature, product packaging, and marketing and public health rhetoric surrounding the test (brand name: OraQuick in-home HIV test), I identify several points of contention that have arisen with the varied, sometimes disparate interests of public health, federal regulators, and private corporations. I propose that while home HIV tests may improve health outcomes for some and appear to expand consumer rights, they are in fact the vanguard of a new form of self-testing that carries a moral urgency to protect one’s own body and to manage societal risk. This thesis concludes with a critical analysis of the prophylactic use of antiretrovirals for HIV, arguing that this practice represents a new relation of the body to risk, while potentially obscuring or normalizing structural conditions that contribute to vulnerability to infection.

Name thesis:degree_name

Medical Humanities (Masters)

Level thesis:degree_level

Masters

Discipline thesis:degree_discipline

Social Medicine

Grantor

The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston

Author dc:creator

• Banda, Jonathan Paul

Advisor dc:contributor.advisor

• Hester, Rebecca

Committee members dc:contributor.committeemember

• Macdonald, Arlene
• Nichols, Joan

• HIV, biopolitics, public health, biosecurity

Handle dc:identifier.uri

http://hdl.handle.net/2152.3/645

OAI identifier oai:identifier

oai:utmb-ir.tdl.org:2152.3/645