{"id":{"repo_id":"uthsc","oai_identifier":"oai:digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu:utgsbs_dissertations-2396"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uthsc/oai:digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu:utgsbs_dissertations-2396","repository":{"repo_id":"uthsc","name":"University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston","base_url":"https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Patient Understanding of Fetal Sex Versus Gender in the Context of Routine Cell-Free DNA Screening","abstract":"<p>Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is the current standard of care to screen for fetal aneuploidy using cell-free DNA (cfDNA). NIPT screens for sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) and in doing so, can predict fetal chromosomal sex. Despite sex and gender being distinct concepts, many patients refer to NIPT as “the gender test” and elect testing in order to find out predicted fetal sex and assume gender. Our study aimed to evaluate and describe patient understanding of sex and gender in the context of receiving routine prenatal genetics education (PGE) on NIPT. A survey was developed with the goal of assessing patient understanding of sex vs. gender and factors that may influence their understanding; this survey was offered at participating University of Texas Physicians (UTP) clinical sites in the Greater Houston area in 2023. It was found that despite a majority (92.0%) of participants receiving PGE that was known to use “sex” exclusively in its written terminology, over half (51.0%) reported that their PGE used “gender.” Participants were more likely to report that their PGE used “gender” if they also reported using “gender” to reference their own pregnancy (p < 0.001). While a majority (76.0%) of participants correctly answered less than 50% of questions aimed to assess understanding of gender, those who were younger (p = 0.001) and those with a higher level of education (p < 0.001) answered more questions correctly. Younger and more educated participants were also more likely to report that they correctly use “sex” to reference their pregnancy as opposed to “gender” (p = 0.018 and p < 0.001, respectively). Ultimately, this study identified that there is a gap in patient understanding of sex vs. gender that could potentially be mediated by improved prenatal genetics education.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is the current standard of care to screen for fetal aneuploidy using cell-free DNA (cfDNA). NIPT screens for sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) and in doing so, can predict fetal chromosomal sex. Despite sex and gender being distinct concepts, many patients refer to NIPT as “the gender test” and elect testing in order to find out predicted fetal sex and assume gender. Our study aimed to evaluate and describe patient understanding of sex and gender in the context of receiving routine prenatal genetics education (PGE) on NIPT. A survey was developed with the goal of assessing patient understanding of sex vs. gender and factors that may influence their understanding; this survey was offered at participating University of Texas Physicians (UTP) clinical sites in the Greater Houston area in 2023. It was found that despite a majority (92.0%) of participants receiving PGE that was known to use “sex” exclusively in its written terminology, over half (51.0%) reported that their PGE used “gender.” Participants were more likely to report that their PGE used “gender” if they also reported using “gender” to reference their own pregnancy (p &lt; 0.001). While a majority (76.0%) of participants correctly answered less than 50% of questions aimed to assess understanding of gender, those who were younger (p = 0.001) and those with a higher level of education (p &lt; 0.001) answered more questions correctly. Younger and more educated participants were also more likely to report that they correctly use “sex” to reference their pregnancy as opposed to “gender” (p = 0.018 and p &lt; 0.001, respectively). Ultimately, this study identified that there is a gap in patient understanding of sex vs. gender that could potentially be mediated by improved prenatal genetics education.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Kolodziejski, Mindy","<p>0009-0005-1078-2936</p>"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Masters of Science (MS)","degree_level":"Thesis (MS)","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Shannon Mulligan, MS, CGC, MB(ASCP)","Natalie Stoner, MS, LGC","Kathryn Leal, MS, CGC"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2024,"date_issued":"2024-05-01T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2024-05-01T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:48:59Z","subjects":["non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT)","genetic counseling","Houston","Texas","gender reveals","gender","Gender, Race, Sexuality, and Ethnicity in Communication","Genetics and Genomics","Maternal and Child Health","Medicine and Health Sciences","Public Health Education and Promotion","Women's Health"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/utgsbs_dissertations/1339","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Shannon Mulligan, MS, CGC, MB(ASCP)","Natalie Stoner, MS, LGC","Kathryn Leal, MS, CGC"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Kolodziejski, Mindy","<p>0009-0005-1078-2936</p>"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2025-04-09T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis (MS)"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Masters of Science (MS)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT)","genetic counseling","Houston","Texas","gender reveals","gender","Gender, Race, Sexuality, and Ethnicity in Communication","Genetics and Genomics","Maternal and Child Health","Medicine and Health Sciences","Public Health Education and Promotion","Women's Health"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/utgsbs_dissertations/1339"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is the current standard of care to screen for fetal aneuploidy using cell-free DNA (cfDNA). NIPT screens for sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) and in doing so, can predict fetal chromosomal sex. Despite sex and gender being distinct concepts, many patients refer to NIPT as “the gender test” and elect testing in order to find out predicted fetal sex and assume gender. Our study aimed to evaluate and describe patient understanding of sex and gender in the context of receiving routine prenatal genetics education (PGE) on NIPT. A survey was developed with the goal of assessing patient understanding of sex vs. gender and factors that may influence their understanding; this survey was offered at participating University of Texas Physicians (UTP) clinical sites in the Greater Houston area in 2023. It was found that despite a majority (92.0%) of participants receiving PGE that was known to use “sex” exclusively in its written terminology, over half (51.0%) reported that their PGE used “gender.” Participants were more likely to report that their PGE used “gender” if they also reported using “gender” to reference their own pregnancy (p < 0.001). While a majority (76.0%) of participants correctly answered less than 50% of questions aimed to assess understanding of gender, those who were younger (p = 0.001) and those with a higher level of education (p < 0.001) answered more questions correctly. Younger and more educated participants were also more likely to report that they correctly use “sex” to reference their pregnancy as opposed to “gender” (p = 0.018 and p < 0.001, respectively). Ultimately, this study identified that there is a gap in patient understanding of sex vs. gender that could potentially be mediated by improved prenatal genetics education.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Patient Understanding of Fetal Sex Versus Gender in the Context of Routine Cell-Free DNA Screening"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Shannon Mulligan, MS, CGC, MB(ASCP)","Natalie Stoner, MS, LGC","Kathryn Leal, MS, CGC"],"dc:creator":["Kolodziejski, Mindy","<p>0009-0005-1078-2936</p>"],"dc:date.available":["2025-04-09T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is the current standard of care to screen for fetal aneuploidy using cell-free DNA (cfDNA). NIPT screens for sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) and in doing so, can predict fetal chromosomal sex. Despite sex and gender being distinct concepts, many patients refer to NIPT as “the gender test” and elect testing in order to find out predicted fetal sex and assume gender. Our study aimed to evaluate and describe patient understanding of sex and gender in the context of receiving routine prenatal genetics education (PGE) on NIPT. A survey was developed with the goal of assessing patient understanding of sex vs. gender and factors that may influence their understanding; this survey was offered at participating University of Texas Physicians (UTP) clinical sites in the Greater Houston area in 2023. It was found that despite a majority (92.0%) of participants receiving PGE that was known to use “sex” exclusively in its written terminology, over half (51.0%) reported that their PGE used “gender.” Participants were more likely to report that their PGE used “gender” if they also reported using “gender” to reference their own pregnancy (p < 0.001). While a majority (76.0%) of participants correctly answered less than 50% of questions aimed to assess understanding of gender, those who were younger (p = 0.001) and those with a higher level of education (p < 0.001) answered more questions correctly. Younger and more educated participants were also more likely to report that they correctly use “sex” to reference their pregnancy as opposed to “gender” (p = 0.018 and p < 0.001, respectively). Ultimately, this study identified that there is a gap in patient understanding of sex vs. gender that could potentially be mediated by improved prenatal genetics education.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/utgsbs_dissertations/1339"],"dc:subject":["non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT)","genetic counseling","Houston","Texas","gender reveals","gender","Gender, Race, Sexuality, and Ethnicity in Communication","Genetics and Genomics","Maternal and Child Health","Medicine and Health Sciences","Public Health Education and Promotion","Women's Health"],"dc:title":["Patient Understanding of Fetal Sex Versus Gender in the Context of Routine Cell-Free DNA Screening"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis (MS)"],"thesis:degree_name":["Masters of Science (MS)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:48:59Z"}